Comedian Jimmy Dore initially got caught up in the propaganda and believed the COVID jab would be a good strategy. He took the shot and suffered severe side effects from it. Dore quickly put two and two together and realized he’d been duped. The shot was nowhere near as safe (or effective) as they claimed
After that realization, Dore started seeing through other propaganda narratives as well
Dore realized the medical establishment lied not only about ivermectin, but also about hydroxychloroquine and early treatments. They lied about herd immunity and natural immunity. They lied about masks. They lied when they said the COVID jab prevents transmission and could end the pandemic. They lied about the safety of the shots, and about the seriousness of the virus itself too
During the Omicron wave, Dore got COVID three times, and it was “the mildest cold” he’d ever had in his life. Unfortunately, he made a second mistake. He took Paxlovid, and got COVID again. That Paxlovid makes you prone to reinfection is now also an established fact
Dore warns that the entire government is corrupt. Corruption has been integrated into every part of the government, and every system used to run it
In this interview, one of my favorite comedians, Jimmy Dore, and I discuss the propaganda machine surrounding all things COVID. I’ve posted many of his videos on this site, as I enjoy his direct and incisive commentary. Like me, Dore grew up in Chicago, Illinois. He packed up his belongings and drove to Los Angeles, California, in 1995, and never looked back.
“Everything worked out in Los Angeles for me when I got to town,” he says. “It was a real refuge being around all the other comedians and actors and artists. I got lucky, I got an agent right away and I was able to get on television right away. So everything worked out.”
Exiting the Matrix
I’m impressed with Dore’s critical thinking skills because, like most people, he got caught up in the propaganda and believed the COVID jab would be a good strategy. He took the shot, suffered side effects from it, and had to find a holistic physician who was able to guide him back to health.
Unlike most people, however, Dore was able to put two and two together after that, and realized he’d been duped. The shot was nowhere near as safe (or effective) as they claimed. After that realization, he started seeing through other propaganda narratives as well.
“I was completely propagandized,” he says. “I have a bone condition that I have to treat every day, so I was afraid. They made it sound like if you got COVID, it’s going to go find the most vulnerable part of your body, it’s going to infect it and kill you. So, I was convinced that if I got it, it was going to go right to my bones and kill me.
I was scared to death. So, I knew I was going to take the vaccine — and I was afraid to look into it. This is true, right? Because I knew I was going to take it anyway, and because both of my doctors had told me to take it, because they didn’t know any better. None of us knew at the time that they were suppressing accurate information. I didn’t know that. Neither did my doctors.
At that time, we didn’t know there were other doctors out there with another narrative. I didn’t know about the Great Barrington Declaration. I didn’t know there were leading scientists and doctors who had a different idea. I didn’t know what a criminal Dr. Fauci was. I didn’t know that he did the same thing in the AIDS crisis.
So, I took the vaccine, I got sick, and never got better. It was just horrible side effects. I had 180/120 blood pressure. I could have had a stroke at any moment. I had nerve pain, nerve damage. I was diagnosed with occipital neuralgia, which if you know what that is, it’s the most wicked stiff neck you’ve ever had in your life.
I had joint pain, exhaustion, shortness of breath. I had it for months. Luckily, [I found doctors] who were on the forefront of treating people who were vaccine injured … and they had a theory. My doctor was Dr. [Ram] Yogendra. He was working with [Dr.] Bruce Patterson and their idea was that people who got vaccine injured would be presenting as if they had long COVID.
They did a special blood test. He showed me my biological markers and said, ‘You are presenting as if you had long COVID, but you’ve never had COVID. So, you got this from the vax’ … They gave me fluvoxamine, azithromycin and ivermectin. And when he gave me ivermectin, I was like, ‘Hey, what’s this? I thought this was that horse paste.’
That’s when it was explained to me that we were being lied to on a scale that our minds can’t comprehend. That ivermectin not only is not dangerous, it’s not only for animals, it’s a human medicine. In fact, it won the Nobel Prize for human medicine, and it’s on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines, has been prescribed billions of times and has saved billions of lives, and is less toxic than Tylenol.
I was like, ‘Are you kidding me?’ And he said, ‘Jimmy, before COVID, they were looking at ivermectin to treat cancer. It was considered a wonder drug. And the reason why they’re lying about it now is because if ivermectin treats COVID, they can’t get their emergency use authorization for these vaccines’ …
So that was like, ‘Oh my god, they’re lying about it. This is just a big money grab. And as soon as I figured that out, and no matter what I looked into, they were lying about it.”
All Lies
As Dore eventually realized, the medical establishment lied not only about ivermectin, but also about hydroxychloroquine and early treatments. They lied about herd immunity and natural immunity. They lied about masks. They lied when they said the COVID jab prevents transmission and could end the pandemic. They lied about the safety of the shots, and about the seriousness of the virus itself too.
“The virus was never a serious virus,” Dore says. “Bill Gates, after he cashed in his stock, money that he invested in Pfizer, then he started telling people the truth. He said, ‘Yeah, well, the virus, it isn’t that deadly. It has a low fatality rate.’ This is a direct quote …
It affects the elderly and those with comorbidities, kind of like the flu, but a little different. The average age of death from COVID is over the age of life expectancy, but we’re vaccinating high schoolers … children and babies. This is a criminal act on an unbelievable scale. And they’re still doing it because they own the media and because they’ve gotten away with it and because they have immunity from lawsuits.
Why do you need immunity from a lawsuit? Why do you need that if it’s safe and effective if you’ve done all the trials? Because it’s not, and you haven’t done all the trials. That’s why.
The people who are pushing this are the biggest criminals in the world, and they’ve already proven that they are willing to kill massive amounts of people for profit … It’s the most psychopathic evil system I’ve ever seen. And everybody is OK with it. So, that was my journey.”
As noted by Dore, a vaccine that doesn’t block transmission of a virus (and therefore doesn’t prevent you from getting sick) isn’t a vaccine. It’s a therapeutic. We now know for a fact that the COVID shots don’t block transmission. They never even tested to see if it would prevent transmission, which is something I and other scientists pointed out from the very beginning. We also have an abundance of evidence showing the shots do more harm than good.
“More people were injured by the ‘vaccine’ than got saved by it,” Dore says. “Right now, nobody should take it. Omicron is a cold. It has done exactly what Dr. Robert Malone explained on my show in early 2021, that the virus is going to mutate to become way more infectious and less deadly. And that’s exactly what happened.”
During the Omicron wave, Dore got COVID three times, “and it was nothing,” he says. “It was the mildest cold I ever had in my life.” Unfortunately, he made a second mistake the first time he got COVID. He took Paxlovid and got it again. That Paxlovid makes you prone to reinfection is now also an established fact.
Corruption Will End the US Empire
“What’s happening is we’re run by psychopathic criminals and … people don’t realize that our government is not ‘regular’ corrupt,” Dore says. Most people think of government corruption in terms of Joe Biden giving his son Hunter a cushy job on an energy board in Ukraine, or Donald Trump setting his son up with a business deal in Saudi Arabia.
But the corruption we’re now starting to see is far worse and more widespread than that. It’s been integrated into every part of the government, and every system used to run it.
“The whole thing is corrupt,” Dore says. “The whole COVID policy was corrupt. The whole vaccine rollout 100% corrupt. Everything that happens in Congress happens because of grease from the oil of corruption. And if there isn’t corruption in there to grease the wheels, the mechanisms of government don’t run.
That’s why we can send $100 billion to Ukraine because that’s $100 billion in corruption, while we don’t send $100 billion to the United States to end homelessness. $100 billion dollars could end homelessness three times in the United States, and they won’t send it to our own country because there’s nobody there to make a profit off it … Our legislators make a big profit off war.
So, we have an endless death economy, and that’s all we can do. We will not invest in our own country. This is called an end of an empire. This is how all empires end, and we’re ending right now …
We have 1,000 military bases around the world. You know how many Russia has? Three. You know how many China has? I don’t know, two. It’s like nothing. We have 1,000 military bases. We’re the terrorists. We’ve had 400 military bases surrounding China since the Korean War.
We’re doing a war right now on Russia’s border. Can you imagine if Russia was financing a war against us in Mexico to the tune of $100 billion dollars? Could you imagine if Russia was sending their missiles and their tanks? What do you think we would do? And that’s exactly what’s happening right now.”
We Live in an Illusion of Democracy
As noted by Dore, Russia, China, India, Italy and Venezuela are now joining forces to create new economic power centers to combat the United States’ hegemony. “And they’re doing it by saber-rattling with two nuclear powers,” Dore says.
“This was the stuff that they said Trump was going to do. Trump actually wasn’t, he was actually a peacenik compared to these guys. Trump didn’t start another war. That’s why they’re arresting him. That’s why they impeached him twice. They had to do an FBI op on January 6.
The whole thing is, they know that people are done with the oligarchy. They’re done with this two-party duopoly, which is a uniparty because they all work for the same people. The Democrats and the Republicans get paid by the same guys: Wall Street, Big Pharma, health insurance, Silicon Valley and the military-industrial complex.
They all work for the same people, which is why we can have an ecological disaster that’s poisoning people in East Palestine, and nobody cares about it in the government, but they will fly to Kiev and promise another $10 billion to a foreign country because corruption is greasing the wheels of that happening …
We live under a fascist government. Anybody who thinks they’re voting for Democrats and patting themselves on the back like they’re fighting against fascism or white supremacy, I want to disabuse you of that stupid idea. You are not. You are voting for another brand of fascism …
This idea that you’re going to end fascism by voting for a Democrat — we already live under a fascist government! Your democracy has already been stolen from you. The perfect marriage of corporations and government, that’s what fascism is. That’s why they mandated vaccines. That’s why they gave $100 billion to Ukraine, and they won’t fix homelessness in America.”
Predictions for the Future
Like me, Dore believes things will get far worse before they get better. In terms of overthrowing the corrupt uniparty, he believes we need a brand-new party that hasn’t yet been swallowed by corruption, and his suggestion for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is contemplating running for President in 2024, is to ditch the Democratic party and form a new one.
“I wish Bobby Kennedy would run as a third party, and I wish he would organize people to get in the streets,” Dore says. “The guy, he’s a real hope. When you talk to him, you can just sense he’s the real deal … I know he is going to run as a Democrat, and wouldn’t it be great if he proved me wrong?…
But superdelegates … would find other ways to rig it. Look what they did to Bernie Sanders this last time. They invented a new app for the Iowa primary, and somehow that new app couldn’t count votes. Isn’t that amazing? They couldn’t figure out how many people voted. And who invented that app? A bunch of Democratic Party operatives and donors.
So, they’re going to invent a way. If it isn’t the superdelegates, which it will be, they will invent new ways to do it, plus the onslaught of the media. Plus, they’ll just say, ‘Oh, he didn’t win. He didn’t get the votes.’ And then if you say, ‘You guys are stealing the election,’ they’ll call you a conspiracy theorist, just like they did to anybody who challenges their elections.
When the Democrats challenge an election, it’s because they’re good people standing up for democracy like they did against the 2016 election. They say the 2016 election was stolen by Russia. So that’s OK to say, but you can’t say any other election was stolen or you’re a kook.
So, our elections weren’t secure enough in 2016 that a conman like Donald Trump could win, but they’re so secure in 2020 that you could never have a question about it.
These people are pathological liars, criminals. We’re ruled by criminals. And I hope Bobby Kennedy gets people in the streets because that’s the only way to get this done. Just like Martin Luther King did, just like Gandhi did. That’s the only way to overthrow [the oligarchy].”
More Information
You can find more of Dore’s insightful and funny commentary by subscribing to his YouTube channel. You can get livestream notifications by signing up for them on JimmyDore.com. You can also follow him on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
TODAY’S FREE ARTICLES
WHO Launches Digital Health Partnership With Europe
June 5, 2023, the World Health Organization and the European Commission announced the launch of a digital health initiative in which the WHO will establish a global COVID-19 vaccination certification system based on the European Union’s (EU) already existing Digital COVID Certificate
This vaccine passport system will be expanded into a Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) run by the WHO that will include “a wide range of digital products to deliver better health for all.” The vaccine passport will also, in time, cover all recommended vaccinations
WHO members have approved a $6.83 billion budget for the next two years, which will require a 20% hike in mandatory member fees
The budget increase is needed because the WHO is being set up as the sole decisionmaker over public health globally through the proposed pandemic treaty and International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments, each of which reinforces the WHO’s authority and power through different avenues while erasing national sovereignty and human rights
Baked into the pandemic treaty we also have One Health, which perfectly dovetails with The Great Reset narrative. When you add the treaty, the IHR amendments and One Health together, it becomes clear that the WHO is being set up as the de facto power center of the deep state, and this One World Government will rule everything
June 5, 2023, the World Health Organization and the European Commission announced the launch of a “landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security.”1,2
As explained in the press release,3 as of this month, the WHO will establish a global COVID-19 vaccination certification system based on the European Union’s (EU) already existing Digital COVID Certificate (EU DCC) to “help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from ongoing and future health threats.”
Eventually, this vaccine passport system will be expanded into a Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) run by the WHO that will include “a wide range of digital products to deliver better health for all.” The vaccine passport will also, in time, cover all recommended vaccinations, not just COVID-19.4 The press release continues:5
“This partnership will work to technically develop the WHO system with a staged approach to cover additional use cases, which may include, for example, the digitization of the International Certificate of Vaccination or Prophylaxis. Expanding such digital solutions will be essential to deliver better health for citizens across the globe.
This cooperation is based on the shared values and principles of transparency and openness, inclusiveness, accountability, data protection and privacy, security, scalability at a global level, and equity. The European Commission and WHO will work together to encourage maximum global uptake and participation.”
Why Implement COVID Passport When Shots Don’t Work?
As reported by The Daily Sceptic, the announcement raises many questions:6
“Vaccine passports are controversial, even in the United Nations … June 30th 2021 … the UNESCO World Commission for the Ethics of Science and Technology and the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee released a joint statement warning that ‘any COVID-19 certificate … should account for scientific uncertainty regarding the degree of protection that specific vaccines, past infections and negative COVID-19 test results provide’ …
In light of these concerns, the UN agencies proposed that ‘a research program should be developed to assess their impact on society and public health, and the risks they might bring.’
The new press release from the WHO and EU makes no mention of the progress of this research program, or whether it has been established at all. Is it not necessary to ascertain the effectiveness and cost-benefit profile of an intervention before rolling it out globally and making it permanent?
Given how leaky COVID vaccines are, and how short-lived any protection offered by them might be — some studies even show the vaccinated suffering higher infection rates than the unvaccinated — it’s hard to imagine that vaccine passports delivered any real limitation of disease transmission.
But the WHO and EU don’t appear to regard this as a relevant question to ask. Is that because they blindly assume they are beneficial, or because they have other reasons for wanting to roll out this restrictive technology globally?”
The implementation of a vaccine passport system — which the WHO claimed it did not support when concerns were initially raised about it in 20217 — is a clear sign that the WHO fully expects to take the reins on global health, and that public health is not the primary incentive behind this power grab.
WHO Takeover Moves Full Speed Ahead
Already, WHO members have approved a $6.83 billion budget for the next two years (2024 through 2025), which will require a 20% hike in mandatory member fees.8,9 “Strategic priorities” that will receive large chunks of this funding include:10
Expanding universal health coverage to at least 1 billion people who do not currently have it
Ensuring 1 billion more people are “better protected from health emergencies”
Ensuring 1 billion more people can enjoy “better health and well-being”
Developing more effective and efficient WHO support to member countries
Eradicating polio (most likely through expanded vaccination programs)
That budget increase is also needed because the WHO is being set up as the sole decisionmaker over public health globally through the proposed pandemic treaty and International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments, each of which reinforces the WHO’s authority and power through different avenues while erasing national sovereignty and human rights.
If the WHO gets its way, it will no longer be a body that makes recommendations that countries can choose to follow. Rather, its “advice” will be akin to declarations of international law. Member states will be required to follow the WHO’s “recommendations” or face costly consequences.
Once the pandemic treaty and the IHR amendments are implemented, the WHO will have the authority to impose everything from climate lockdowns and border closures to mandatory vaccinations of all kinds. We’ve also warned that the WHO would implement a mandatory vaccine passport system for population control purposes, and with the announcement above, we can consider that a done deal.
The WHO will even have the authority to dictate what is truth and what is misinformation that must be censored. The WHO will essentially outlaw democracy worldwide because democracy cannot exist unless there is freedom of speech in public discourse.
Member states will have no choice but to censor what the WHO wants censored, because each country is also required to set up an enforcement agency to ensure the WHO’s edicts are followed nationwide, and that includes censorship activities.
For a further review of the WHO’s new Global Digital Health Certification Network, see John Campbell’s video review above.
It’s now beyond imperative that people understand where we’re headed, and that the COVID measures weren’t just responses to a given pandemic, but rather were the foundation for a totalitarian one world government where human rights and freedoms will no longer exist.
Indeed, the pandemic treaty redefines human rights as “health equity” and nothing else. The IHR amendments also eliminate individual rights and freedoms specifically. IHR Article 3 is being amended as follows (strikethroughs in the text indicate that the text is to be deleted, and the additions or revisions are underlined in bold):
“The implementation of these Regulations shall be with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons based on the principles of equity, inclusivity, coherence and in accordance with their common but differentiated responsibilities of the States Parties, taking into consideration their social and economic development.”
In other words, bodily autonomy and personal choice are being replaced by one-size-fits-all medicine that has no regard for human dignity, human rights or fundamental freedoms. The right to opinions that differ from the WHO’s is also being removed on the national level.
IHR Article 2 is also being amended in such a way that the WHO will have the authority to take action on ANYTHING that has the “potential to impact public health,” and this includes everything from climate and pollution to agricultural land use and the food industry, as specified under the One Health agenda,11,12 which is baked into the pandemic treaty.
To understand what’s at stake, please review the article-by-article compilation of the proposed IHR amendments,13found here, and then compare that to the proposed treaty. A “Zero Draft” dated February 1, 2023, can be found here.14
As explained by the WHO back in 2021, the treaty is the “framework that recognizes the central role of the IHR.”15 So, these two instruments are designed and intended to work as a unit, with the treaty giving recognition to the IHR, and the IHR amendments stripping nations of their sovereignty.
But that’s not all. Baked into the pandemic treaty we also have One Health, which perfectly dovetails with The Great Reset narrative. When you add these three things together — the treaty, the IHR amendments and One Health — it becomes clear that the WHO is being set up as the de facto power center of the deep state, and this One World Government will rule everything.
Treaty Expands WHO’s Power Beyond Pandemics
As illustrated in the graphic16 below, the One Health agenda is based on the premise that a broad range of aspects of life and the environment have the potential to impact human health.
In addition to the life segments listed on this graph, the scope of One Health, according to a One Health Commission document,17 also includes communications, economics, civil society, global trade, commerce and security, public policy and regulation, research, noncommunicable diseases and much more.
Under the new treaty, the WHO will have unilateral power to make decisions about all of these areas, and its dictates will supersede and overrule any and all local, state and federal laws. In short, if the pandemic treaty is enacted, the WHO will not merely have the authority to dictate how countries prepare for and respond to pandemic threats: It will have the authority to dictate every aspect of our lives.
The WHO, in turn, is beholden to and does what its funders want, and the largest funder is Bill Gates (when you add together all his various donation sources). Gates, of course, is invested in all primary Great Reset necessities, including fake food, drugs, vaccines, surveillance and climate modification technologies.
One Health Is the Subversion of Holistic Health
As noted by David Bell, a senior scholar at Brownstone Institute, a public health physician and former medical officer and scientist at the WHO, the One Health agenda is really the subversion of the age-old holistic concept of health:18
“Ill health is a lever for fear, and death even more so, especially to those who believe that we are simply organic constructs that end in dust and decay. A cult feeding off these fears, holding that the entire biosphere is threatening us with diseases and death, would therefore have real potential for mass control.
Convince followers that humans are the poison that made this world so destructive, and you will also have a means to stoke hate against non-believers whilst adding guilt to the tools for compliance.
A cult based on fear of the world and the people who poisoned it, dressed up in philanthropy and virtue, has risen amongst us. Co-opting One Health terminology, it is now funded by the spoils of COVID, and empowered by technology that can take this medieval witch-hunting sect global.
The environment, everywhere, should be managed and protected for human benefit — physical, mental, and social. The One Health concept, centered in such common sense, was once no more than this. It is a rational way to express an age-old principle … Sanitation and improved nutrition will save more lives than the next round of profiteering brought to us by Pfizer.
However … One Health has been hijacked by self-proclaimed philanthropists … One Health is being corrupted in two ways, but for the same ends and by much the same people. Understanding one tells us about the people we are dealing with, the other reveals their motives.”
The One Health Ideology Is Anti-Human
As explained by Bell, One Health is an ideology that places human life and welfare on par with all other life, including plants and animals. This means that your life, and the lives of your children, are no more important than the lives of polar bears, trees, waterways and soil.
If your actions cause ecological harm, and the polar bear doesn’t, then you are the one who must be eliminated from the equation. That’s really the crux of this ideology. It’s not pro-environment but, rather, anti-human at its core.
“Within this ‘equitable’ worldview, humans become a pollutant,” Bell writes.19“Ever-growing human populations have driven other species to extinction through environmental change, from the megafauna of ancient Australasia to the plummeting insect populations of modern Europe.
Humans become a plague upon the earth, and their restriction, impoverishment and death may therefore be justified for a greater good.
It is difficult for people to grasp that this is a guiding ideology of public figures, as it runs counter to most human moral systems or Natural Law … We must understand the ideology driving this movement, as they intend for us to follow their dictates, and they intend to indoctrinate our children.”
Expose the Barren Ideology of One Health
One Health is also designed to control the masses through fear. We’re constantly bombarded with predictions of doom and told we must be protected for our own good.
“Expanding this approach from a single virus to any aspect of the biosphere impacting human well-being, such as climate, provides an opportunity to use this totalitarian tool of population control to reshape society to the model that the purveyors of fear desire,” Bell notes, adding:
“Through amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and a new ‘pandemic treaty,’ the WHO is coupling this broad definition of One Health with a definition of ‘emergency’ that simply requires recognition of a threat rather than actual harm.
When applied to the WHO’s broad definition of health, ‘physical, mental and social well-being,’ almost all aspects of normal life could be included in its scope. Addressed through a proscriptive public health paradigm that encompasses global mandates, restrictions and censorship, and those running this agenda have an opportunity for unprecedented power …
[In] 2019, the WHO stated in its recommendations for pandemic influenza that border closures, quarantine, and prolonged business closures should never be undertaken in response to a pandemic. These measures would drive inequality and disproportionately harm low-income people, destroying both economies and social capital.
In 2020, refocusing priorities on a new constituency, the WHO promoted these same inequitable policies. The evidence did not change, but the constituency did. Wealthy people and corporations had become significant directive funders of WHO programs. Those who benefit from improved nutrition and sanitation cannot fund the WHO’s growing staff, but those profiting from the largesse of the COVID response can …
Evil is not defeated by hiding from it. It is fought by exposing the ideology that drives it, the greed, the lies, and the deceit … In the end, mad ideologues collapse under the weight of their own deceit and the shallowness of their dogmas.
The earth-mother religion of a corrupted One Health and the feudalist ambitions of its priests will be no different. We should not fear public health or a holistic view of the world. They are ours and can be a force for good. Rather, we should expose the hollowness of the people who would subvert them, driven by their own greed and barren ideologies.”
We’re Running Out of Time
Plandemic 3: The Great Awakening (Full, Unedited Movie) Please click on link:
Importantly, as noted by comedian Jimmy Dore in the featured video above, the pandemic treaty is not something that member nations must opt into. It’s an opt-out proposition. If a nation fails to opt out before the deadline, they automatically accept the treaty.
Based on the current timeline, the World Health Assembly (WHA) will vote on the pandemic treaty in May 2024, and it will take force 30 days later. That gives us just under a year and a half to get the U.S. to either opt out, or better yet, exit the WHO altogether.
The IHR amendments will also be voted on in May 2024. The 10-month deadline for member states to reject the amendments will expire in March 2025, and the amendments will come into force for any nation that did not reject them in May 2025. For any member that rejects the amendments, the 2005 IHR will apply.
Strangely enough, some of the IHR amendments have been adopted already. As reported by author and researcher James Roguski,20 they were adopted during the 75th World Health Assembly, May 27, 2022, even though nothing was signed. This is yet another testament to the rampant lawlessness and subversive tactics we’re dealing with.
Disturbingly, many Americans aren’t even aware that the U.S. government is about to relinquish our national sovereignty and everyone’s personal bodily autonomy to the WHO21 because mainstream media aren’t talking about it.
So, please, share this and any other articles you find on this subject with everyone you know, and continue to educate yourself. By far, these are the greatest threats to freedom the world has ever seen, and the risks apply evenly to everyone, no matter where you live.
Fact Checkers Take Advantage of Confusion
Keep in mind that while the IHR amendments and treaty address different areas of the WHO’s new power structure, they will work together to massively empower the WHO once both come into force. Also be aware that since the global takeover is happening on several fronts at the same time, it’s easy to get confused on the details, and this confusion can easily become fodder for fact checkers. As reported by The Defender:22
“The AP recently ‘fact-checked’ claims that the pandemic treaty endangers national sovereignty. According to the AP, it ‘does not overrule any nation’s ability to pass individual pandemic-related policies’ and ‘does not overrule any nations’ individual health or domestic policies.’ There would be ‘effectively no legal consequences for signatories who fail to adhere to it or violate its terms.’
The AP ‘fact-check’ doesn’t mention the proposed IHR amendments. [Author and researcher James] Roguski cited this as an example of the frequent conflation of the pandemic treaty and the IHR amendments. He said language eroding national sovereignty is not found in the pandemic treaty — but is found in the IHR amendments.
‘Everyone’s paying attention to the treaty,’ Roguski said. ‘They’re completely and totally cross-pollinating the details that are in the amendments, attributing them to the treaty, and getting ‘fact-checked’ to high heaven.”
Call on Congress to Withdraw US From the WHO
While the U.S. House and Senate have introduced identical bills to thwart the WHO’s power grab through the proposed pandemic treaty, that still might not protect us, because the treaty is specifically written to circumvent the Senate-approval process.23
A far more effective strategy would be for Congress to withhold its annual contributions to the WHO, and then withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether. I believe it may be worth supporting all these strategies. So, please, contact your representatives and urge them to:
Support the No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act24,25,26,27,28
Withhold funding for the WHO
Support U.S. withdrawal from the WHO
We also need to protect our nation against the IHR amendments. To that end, the World Council for Health has launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. Here’s how you can get involved:29
Speak — Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos
Act — Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices and cases and similar campaigns
Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health
September 12, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy.” This executive order makes biotechnology a national priority across agencies and branches of government. Similar legislation has been introduced in the U.K.
In late March 2023, Biden expanded on this premise in a “Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing” report. According to this plan, the food industry is now to be led by biotech, and the “improvements” we can look forward to are more lab-grown meats and bioengineered plant foods
Rather than investing taxpayer dollars in regenerative agriculture, which is what could really solve our problems, government is instead backing a whole new industry of fake foods, from lab-grown meats to large-scale insect production
Two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have now received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S.
Meanwhile, a Food Hazards Identification report by the British Food standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland, published in March 2023, warns there are “considerable gaps in knowledge” when it comes to cell-based meat production, and many potential hazards
September 12, 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy.”1
This executive order makes biotechnology a national priority across agencies and branches of government. As noted in this order, biotechnology will also be used to “improve” food security, sustainability, and agricultural innovation in the U.S.:
“The Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the heads of appropriate agencies as determined by the Secretary, shall submit a report assessing how to use biotechnology and biomanufacturing for food and agriculture innovation, including by improving sustainability and land conservation; increasing food quality and nutrition; increasing and protecting agricultural yields; protecting against plant and animal pests and diseases; and cultivating alternative food sources.”
Support of Bioengineered Fake Food Is Now White House Policy
In late March 2023, Biden expanded on this premise in a “Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing” report.2 According to this plan, the food industry is now to be led by biotech, and the “improvements” we can look forward to are more lab-grown meats and bioengineered plant foods.
In the featured video above, I discuss this rapidly advancing trend, and the true geopolitical incentives behind it, because the U.S. is not alone in moving in this direction. A similar plan is detailed in the U.K.’s Genetic Technology and Precision Breeding Act of 2023.3 Specific goals highlighted in Biden’s “Bold Goals” report include:4
•Increasing agricultural productivity by 28% in the next decade
•Reducing food waste by 50% by 2030
•Reducing methane emissions from agriculture by 30% by 2030 by:
1.Capturing biogases from manure management systems
2.Reducing methane emissions from ruminant livestock
3.Reducing methane emissions from food waste in landfills
As reported by Food Dive:5
“While advocates and some companies have been working to reduce methane emissions from food, cut down on food waste, increase capacity for producing alternative proteins and use bioengineering to make healthier and hardier crops and animals, goals like these have never before come from the White House …
The federal government is providing more evidence that it intends to do more than just talk about big goals. A day before the report came out, FDA gave its second tacit approval to a company using biotechnology to grow meat from cells in bioreactors.
While neither … is creating meat for consumers yet, this action shows that the federal government is moving toward making cultivated meat a reality.”
The idea that pathogens will jump species and kill humans is a useful scare tactic, and it’s now being pushed like never before under One Health — a global agenda that will allow unelected bureaucrats at the World Health Organization to centralize power and make decisions relating to diet, agriculture and livestock farming, environmental pollution, movement of populations, health care and much more, for the entire world
A report from Harvard Law School and New York University predicts the next pandemic is likely to emerge from the U.S. meat supply — or the fur trade, or a petting zoo, or from pets. It reviews all the different areas of life and commerce that involve animal and human contact and the subsequent hypothetical zoonotic transmission chains. One Health documents are repeatedly referenced in this report
Incontrovertible evidence has emerged showing that the scientists who wrote “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” intentionally misled the public. In “Proximal Origin,” the authors insisted natural evolution was the most likely scenario, but in private, they thought a lab leak was the most likely origin
Correspondence shows the conspiracy to misdirect the public was driven by obedience to higher-ups within the U.S. and UK governments, including, potentially, the intelligence community
Based on the evidence now in the public domain showing that the authors of “Proximal Origin” did not believe their published conclusions, Biosafety Now! has launched a petition calling on Nature Medicine to retract the paper
The same people who went out of their way to convince us that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through natural evolution in the wild were privately saying they were convinced it came from a lab.
Now, were SARS-CoV-2 to be publicly acknowledged to be a genetically engineered lab-escape, the obvious conclusion would be that we need to shut down much of the gain-of-function research that led to its creation. Needless to say, that would be a significant setback for the biosecurity agenda, which needs pandemics to justify the centralization of power and decision-making.
Zoonotic Transmission Is Not the Threat It’s Made Out To Be
The fact of the matter is, zoonotic transmission is extremely rare, and most if not all global pandemics with lethal outcomes can be traced back to lab experiments. As just one example, USA Today1 recently reiterated the debunked claim that the 2013 Ebola outbreak in West Africa was caused by infected bush meat. (Another widely circulated hypothesis is that it emerged from infected bats.)
However, as detailed in “Turns Out, Ebola Likely Leaked From a Lab as Well,” there’s compelling evidence linking that outbreak to a U.S.-run research laboratory in Kenema, Sierra Leone. And, curiously, many of the same individuals, companies and organizations involved in the Ebola epidemic have also been linked to the alleged creation of SARS-CoV-2.
The idea that pathogens will jump species and kill humans is a useful scare tactic, however, and it’s now being pushed like never before under One Health — a global agenda that will allow unelected bureaucrats at the World Health Organization to centralize power and make decisions relating to diet, agriculture and livestock farming, environmental pollution, movement of populations, health care and much more, for the entire world.
Report Predicts Next Pandemic May Come From Meat
To that end, a report2 from the Brooks McCormick Jr. Animal Law & Policy Program at Harvard Law School and the Center for Environmental & Animal Protection at New York University now predicts that the next pandemic is likely to emerge from the U.S. meat supply — or the fur trade, or a petting zoo, or from pets.
It basically reviews all the different areas of life and commerce that involve animal and human contact, however brief or rare, and the subsequent hypothetical zoonotic transmission chains. Not surprisingly, One Health documents are repeatedly referenced in this report.
Overall, the One Health agenda calls for minimizing or eliminating certain animal-human contact, sterilizing areas where animals are kept or butchered, and/or increasing the use of antibiotics and vaccines in animals across the board. It also calls for massively increased biosurveillance and testing.
In contrast, the report in question primarily focuses on legislative and regulatory actions to curtail zoonotic disease, including the potential banning of certain animal practices that “present great risk but relatively little value, economic or otherwise.”
Will the warnings in this report be used to justify the transition to fake meat? It certainly wouldn’t surprise me. The fake meat industry wants you to believe that their cell-based lab-concoctions are the answer to today’s environmental woes, and that includes the threat of zoonotic disease transmission, as lab-grown meat is grown in highly hygienic and sterile (supposedly) conditions.3
Basically, the One Health narrative is that the natural environment poses countless risks to human health and must therefore be controlled. Meanwhile, it’s mankind’s efforts to control and replace nature in the first place that is causing most of the problems.
While the One Health narrative is that pandemics are caused by animals, there’s little doubt that the next pandemic will come from a lab, just like most previous pandemics, including COVID-19. Over the past several months, more and more evidence has emerged showing that the scientists who wrote “Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2”4 intentionally misled the public.
“Proximal Origin,” which became the most-cited paper (a Letter to the Editor mischaracterized everywhere as a serious scientific review), claimed SARS-CoV-2 emerged through natural evolution and spread via a wet market in Wuhan, China, and that there was no evidence to suggest genetic engineering or a lab origin.
Private communications, however, reveal they suspected the virus had leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and had been genetically engineered to infect humans.
Mounting evidence also suggests this act of misdirection (to put it diplomatically) was done at the behest of Dr. Anthony Fauci (then-director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIAID), Dr. Francis Collins (then-director of the National Institutes of Health, NIH) and Sir. Jeremy Farrar (then-head of the Wellcome Trust).
Correspondence shows the conspiracy to misdirect the public was driven by obedience to higher-ups within the U.S. and UK governments, including, potentially, the intelligence community.
As noted in a July 20, 2023, Public Substack article by independent journalists Alex Gutentag, Leighton Woodhouse and Michael Shellenberger:5
“The documents … show [Kristian] Andersen and his co-authors, Andrew Rambaut, Edward C. Holmes, and Robert F. Garry, conspiring — by which we mean they made secret plans to engage in deceptive and unethical behavior and — to spread disinformation.
Their conspiracy included coordinating with their ‘higher-ups’ in the U.S. and UK governments to deceive journalists … We … today … release the full cache of Slack messages and emails covering the discussions between Andersen et al. as they wrote their influential ‘Proximal Origin’ paper, which Anthony Fauci and others in the U.S. government used to dismiss the lab leak hypothesis.”
While Fauci’s role in the creation of this paper has garnered the most attention, a more central culprit in this coverup may actually be Farrar — and he’s now the chief scientist for the WHO, a fact that hardly inspires confidence in the WHO’s future adherence to scientific truth and fact. The email exchange below between Andersen and Farrar (with other authors cc’d) suggests Farrar was a key decision-maker.
Proof of a Conspiracy
A 140-page PDF containing the “Proximal Origin” author’s Slack messages and a 163-page PDF of emails can be downloaded from the Public article,6 in which Gutentag, Woodhouse and Shellenberger go on to highlight some of the takeaways from this correspondence.
For starters, in “Proximal Origin,” the authors insisted natural evolution was the most likely scenario, but in private, they thought a lab leak was the most likely origin.
In “Proximal Origin” they claimed “the evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus” and that “we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.” Behind the scenes, however, Andersen wrote:
“I think the main thing still in my mind is that the lab escape version of this is so friggin’ likely to have happened because they were already doing this type of work and the molecular data is fully consistent with that scenario.”
Andersen also stated that “The main issue is that accidental escape is in fact highly likely — it’s not some fringe theory.” Farrar and the other authors expressed similar views:7
February 2, 2020, Dr. Robert Garry wrote, “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario … I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature … Of course, in the lab it would be easy …”
February 2, 2020, Dr. Michael Farzan wrote he was “bothered by the furin site” and had “a hard time explain[ing] that as an event outside the lab … I am 70:30 or 60:40 [lab].”
February 2, 2020, Dr. Andrew Rambaut wrote, “From a (natural) evolutionary point of view the only thing here that strikes me as unusual is the furin cleavage site.”
February 4, 2020, Dr. Edward Holmes indicated that he was “60-40 lab,” and Farrar wrote, “I am 50-50 [lab].”
Holmes also commented: “No way selection could occur in the market. Too low a density of mammals: just small groups of 3-4 in cases,” and Garry wrote:8
“Transmitting a bat virus-like RatG13 in HeLa cells and then asking your graduate student to insert a furin site … would get you there. It’s not crackpot to suggest this could have happened given the Gain of Function research we know is happening …
I’m thinking mostly about the PRRA to generate the furin site. Relatively easy to drop 12 bases in. The proline is the hang-up — why add that? Makes me think the cell culture passage scenario is possible/probably assuming this has in fact been observed before by Farzan and Fouchier.”
The following graphic, created by @RAEMKA1 and reposted by KanekoaTheGreat on Twitter summarizes the scientific consensus among the “Proximal Origin” authors:
Indeed, Andersen called Fauci February 1, 2020, specifically because he was concerned that the virus showed signs of being engineered. Immediately after that phone call, Fauci contacted Farrar and raised the possibility of taking the concern to the FBI in the U.S. and MI5 in the UK.
Instead, Farrar organized a conference call that led to the creation of “Proximal Origin.”9 From the emails, we know that the genetic engineering aspect of SARS-CoV-2 was discussed. However, concerns about harm to science apparently weighed heavier. After the call, Ron Fouchier wrote:10
“An accusation that nCoV-2019 might have been engineered and released into the environment by humans (accidental or intentional) would need to be supported by strong data, beyond reasonable doubt.
It is good that this possibility was discussed in detail with a team of experts. However, further debate about such accusations would unnecessarily distract top researchers from their active duties and do unnecessary harm to science in general and science in China in particular.”
In a February 9, 2020, email, Christian Drosten also confirmed that the group had been “convened to challenge a certain theory,” and if possible, “drop” or eliminate that theory (i.e., the lab leak theory) from the public and scientific conversation. As recently as the day before, February 8, Andersen had made a case for keeping the possibility of a lab leak open, stating:11
“Our main work over the last couple of weeks has been focused on trying to disprove any type of lab theory, but we are at a crossroad where the scientific evidence isn’t conclusive enough to say that we have high confidence in any of the three main theories considered.”
Authors Never Believed in the Pangolin Theory
In “Proximal Origin,” the authors went on to blame pangolins as an intermediate host between bats and humans, but in private, they remained unconvinced. The conclusion in “Proximal Origin” reads:12
“The presence in pangolins of an RBD [receptor binding domain] very similar to that of SARS-CoV-2 means that we can infer this was also probably in the virus that jumped to humans.”
However, shortly before the “Proximal Origin” pre-print was published, Andersen wrote: “For all I know, people could have infected the pangolin, not the other way,” and the day after the pre-print, he commented: “Clearly none of these pangolin sequences was the source though.”
Authors Thought Lab Leak Was Likely Months After Publication
The authors also clearly thought a lab leak was possible months after publishing the “Proximal Origin” paper. In mid-April 2020, a month after the paper was officially published and two months after the preprint was posted, Andersen wrote to his coauthors:
“I’m still not fully convinced that no culture was involved … are we absolutely certain that no culture could have been involved? What concerns me here are some of the comments by Shi in the SciAm article (‘I had to check the lab’ etc) and the fact that the furin site is being messed with in vitro …
Finally, the paper that was shared with us showing a very similar phenomenon (exactly 12 bp insertion) in other CoV’s has me concerned … We also can’t fully rule out engineering (for basic research).”
In fact, the authors — like so many other independent scientists, researchers and journalists — suspected Shi Zhengli’s work at the WIV could have produced SARS-CoV-2. As reported by Public:13
“Andersen discussed some of her papers in early February and noted his concerns about gain-of-function experiments on MERS and SARS viruses. In mid-April he noted that Shi’s work was ‘the main reason I have been so concerned about the ‘culture’ scenario.’
Cell culturing is a method through which viruses can be passed multiple times through cells in order to render them more infectious and is exactly the kind of ‘laboratory-based scenario’ the authors ruled out in their paper.”
Conspiracy Driven by Obedience to Higher-Ups
Finally, the correspondence shows that the conspiracy to misdirect, if not outright deceive, the public was driven by obedience to higher-ups within the U.S. and UK governments, including Farrar, Fauci and Collins, but also, potentially, other unnamed individuals within various government agencies and/or the intelligence community.
While Andersen has publicly denied that Fauci had any involvement in the publication, in an email to the journal Nature, Andersen specified that the paper had been “prompted” by Fauci, Collins and Farrar.14 If you want to take a deeper dive into how the “Proximal Origin” paper was created, check out U.S. Right to Know’s timeline.15
Scientists Call for Retraction of ‘Proximal Origin’
Based on all the evidence now in the public domain showing that the authors of “Proximal Origin” did not believe their published conclusions, Biosafety Now! has launched a petition16 calling on Nature Medicine to retract the paper. As noted by Biosafety Now!:
“Email messages and direct messages via the messaging program Slack among authors of the paper obtained under FOIA or by the U.S. Congress and publicly released in full in July 2023 … show, incontrovertibly, that the authors did not believe the conclusions of the paper at the time the paper was written, at the time the paper was submitted for publication, and at the time the paper was published.
They thus show that the paper was, and is, the product of scientific fraud and scientific misconduct. It is imperative that this clearly fraudulent and clearly damaging paper be removed from the scientific literature.”
Among the many problems with this plan is the fact that taxpayers will now be paying for government’s funding of private corporations involved in the fake food industry. The end result is predictable. What we’ll have is a repeat of what happened with farm subsidies.
Rather than subsidizing the most nutritious foods, government farm subsidies go almost exclusively to large monoculture farms growing genetically engineered corn, soy and other basic ingredients used in processed foods. As a result, the processed food industry has grown on our dime while public health has deteriorated.
The same thing will happen here. Instead of investing in regenerative agriculture, which is what could really solve our problems, government is backing a whole new industry of fake foods, from lab-grown meats to large-scale insect production.
At present, two cell-based lab-grown meat companies have received the green light to produce and sell fake chicken in the U.S. The first, Upside Foods (previously Memphis Meats), received FDA approval for its cell-based lab-grown chicken in November 2022.6 According to the FDA’s November 14, 2022, memo:7
“We have no questions at this time about UPSIDE’s conclusion that foods comprised of or containing cultured chicken cell material resulting from the production process … are as safe as comparable foods produced by other methods.”
Dr. Uma Valeti, CEO and founder of Upside Foods, called the approval “a watershed moment in the history of food” and a “major step toward a new era in meat production.” The company has a 53,000-square-foot facility in the San Francisco Bay Area capable of producing 400,000 pounds of fake meat per year.
In March 2023, Eat Just — which has been selling its lab-grown chicken in Singapore since 2020 — also received FDA approval. The company is currently building a commercial-scale facility in the U.S. that will house 10 250,000-liter bioreactors.8 Vítor Espírito Santo, senior director of Eat Just’s cellular agriculture division, told Food Dive:9
“The Singapore approval was a big, big deal. But it’s undeniable that the U.S., the FDA approval, is something that we were looking forward [to] for many years, and I think it’s a big game changer for the industry.
We have two countries now. Hopefully now this keeps happening in more and more jurisdictions, and cultivated meat can become a reality worldwide.”
Safety Data Is Sorely Lacking
While the U.S. government is moving full speed ahead with approvals for lab-grown meats, a Food Hazards Identification report10 by the British Food standards Agency (FSA) and Food Standards Scotland, published in March 2023, warns there are “considerable gaps in knowledge” when it comes to cell-based meat production. As reported by Food Safety News March 24, 2023:11
“The purpose of the report was to identify hazards in the cultivated meat production process to help inform the FSA risk assessment process for authorization. It was also important that products do not pose any microbiological or chemical concerns. The research was based on a review of scientific literature in 2020.
There was little or no data on the final analytical composition of products, key toxicology data, nutrition profiles, product stability, allergy risk, and any recorded adverse effects when consumed by animals or humans …
The FSA report found there are several stages of development for producing cultured meat and at each one, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives, and supplements are used. The contamination risk of each input needs to be assessed, as any undesirable components that remain in the final product need to be at an acceptable exposure level or be food-grade and safe.”
Potential problem areas identified by the FSA include:12,13
Contaminated reagents, air or water baths
Poorly cleaned or maintained equipment
Failing to follow cleaning protocols when culturing cells
Failing to follow good laboratory practices (GLP) and/or good manufacturing practices (GMP)
Use of antibiotics, fungicides and/or chemicals that are toxic to humans in the production
Consumption of viruses used in the manufacturing process
Cross-contamination of one cell line into another due to concomitant use of multiple cell lines
Other cross-contamination risks, such as “poor maintenance of equipment, poor cleaning regimes, incorrect storage of cells, working with multiple cell lines in one area, using the wrong cells and incorrect labeling”
New diseases and/or allergic reactions to new proteins due to using cell lines of animals not common in the local diet
Nutritional deficiencies, “as the nutrition profile could be different from what it is replacing”
As noted in the report:14
“There are many stages of development for producing cultured meat … from taking a cell line from a small vial or biopsy and increasing the culture volume stepwise in stages (proliferation), until a commercial sized bioreactor can be seeded, to differentiating the cells to final desired cell type.
Then [they are] maturing them, usually on a scaffold, to increase the protein content, and then detaching/grinding the cells with/from their scaffold to produce a final product that can be used to make meat like cells. At each stage, different chemicals, biologics, media formulations, additives and supplements are used to ensure a successful culture.”
Contamination can occur at any of these steps. Each additive also poses potential risks, both known and unknown, as various byproducts are created in the process. In the video above, I review some of the many potential dangers associated with fake meats.
Considering the multistep processing cultivated meats undergo, it’s simply not possible for it to be as safe as conventional meat, where the primary contamination risks are limited to slaughter, processing, packaging, distribution and storage. With fake meats, hazardous contamination can occur at any point during manufacturing, in addition to these conventional “weak points.”
Fake Meat Is Ultraprocessed Greenwashed Junk Food
Synthetic meat is the epitome of ultraprocessed food,15 and it seems naïve to think it won’t have health effects similar to other ultraprocessed junk foods. Obesity,16 Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and depression are but a few examples of conditions known to be promoted and exacerbated by a processed food diet.17,18,19,20,21
Ultraprocessed foods already account for up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions. So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions?
Synthetic foods will likely be an even bigger driver or chronic ill health and early death. Ultraprocessed foods are also completely counterproductive to environmentally “green” and sustainable goals.
For example, ultraprocessed foods already account for 17% to 39% of total diet-related energy use, 36% to 45% of total diet-related biodiversity loss and up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.22 So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions? As noted in a September 2022 Journal of Cleaner Production paper:23
“Ultraprocessed foods are fundamentally unsustainable products; they have been associated with poor health and social outcomes and require finite environmental resources for their production … are responsible for significant diet-related energy, [and] greenhouse gas emissions.”
And, for all the lip service paid to “equity,” increasing consumption of processed foods will actually worsen economic inequalities, as it redirects money away from small farmers and independent homesteaders to transnational corporations that rely on underpaid workers.
Ultimately, the answer to food safety and food security lies not in a biotech-centered food system that is controlled from the top down, but rather in a decentralized system that connects communities with farmers who grow real food in sustainable ways and distribute that food locally.
Strategies that can get us there were covered in the Children’s Health Defense’s March 4, 2023, Attack on Food symposium (video above). Food Sovereignty was primarily covered in Session 3, which begins at three hours and 45 minutes.
For example, Dr. John Day and Beverly Johannson shared tips on how to grow your own food and preserve the food you grow. Other helpful strategies include buying food from local farmers and farmers markets, and creating independent food hubs that cut out the middlemen.
The final session of the symposium dealt with larger societal solutions to fight back against the war on food. U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie highlighted core vulnerabilities in the U.S. food supply, which fell apart during the pandemic when farmers had to euthanize animals because they couldn’t get them processed.
Four meatpackers control 85% of the meat that’s processed in the U.S. One of them is owned by China, one by Brazil and the other two are multinational corporations. Food prices are going up while farmers are going broke. In 2017, Massie introduced the Processing Revival and Intrastate Meat Exemption (PRIME) Act,24 but the bill hasn’t moved since its introduction in the House.
The PRIME Act would allow farmers to sell meat processed at smaller slaughtering facilities and allow states to set their own meat processing standards, because small slaughterhouses do not have an inspector on staff — a requirement that only large facilities can easily fulfill — they’re banned from selling their meat. The PRIME Act would lift this regulation without sacrificing safety, as random USDA inspections could still occur.
“If a farmer wants to sell pork, beef or lamb to a consumer, as long as that consumer and that farmer and that processor are all in the same state, they’re not crossing state lines, they keep the federal government out of that transaction,” he said.
Massey has also introduced legislation to protect access to raw milk (HR 4835, the Interstate Milk Freedom Act of 202125).26 The bill was introduced at the end of July 2021, as an amendment to the 2018 Farm bill. Contact your representatives and urge them to support these bills.
Flax Is Not a Health Food — Stop Consuming It and Use It to Paint Instead
Flax, historically used in paints and industrial applications, is often marketed as a health food despite its potential negative effects on metabolism and long-term health
The principal use of flax oil in the past has been for industrial purposes, such as paint, due to its high polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) content, which makes it prone to oxidation
Consuming flaxseed oil, synonymous with linseed oil, can be harmful because PUFAs are unstable and oxidize easily
Flaxseeds also contain lignans, a type of phytoestrogen, which can mimic estrogen and contribute to hormonal imbalances, increasing the risk of conditions like breast cancer
Excess PUFA consumption lowers thyroid and metabolism, as thyroid hormone (the master metabolic regulator) is blocked at the production, transport, and cellular action steps by PUFA
When evaluating something as a ‘health food’ — we have to put our ‘metabolism lenses’ on. Does this improve metabolism and thus long-term health? Or, are there potentially some minute short-term benefits that come with long-term consequences and a down-regulation of metabolism? (Which will negatively impact health.)
There is really good marketing out there trying to convince us that ingredients historically used as paint are now a superfood. (Because it is extremely profitable!) One example is flaxseed and flaxseed oil — you should not be consuming these! And to better understand why, let’s briefly review why it works really well for paint!
The principal use of the oil in flax in the past has been in paints, coating and other industrial uses — the fibers were used to make fishing nets, ropes, and sailcloths and the linseed oil obtained from the flax plant has been one of the most important binders for oil paint for more than 500 years.
Flax is rich in an omega-3 polyunsaturated fat (PUFA) alpha-linoleic, C18:3. PUFAs contain 2 or more double bonds (shown in green, below), and each double bond in the fat makes it more unstable and prone to oxidation.
The structures of a saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fat. Note the differences in points of unsaturation (C=C double bonds) on some of the fatty acids. From Nutrition: Science and Everyday Application, v. 1.0.
The longer the chains of these PUFA get (such as ALA), the more unsaturated and unstable they become.
How Flaxseed Went From Paint to ‘Health Food’
Flaxseed oil or flax oil is technically synonymous with the term ‘linseed oil,’ as both refer to the oil obtained from the dried, ripened seeds of the flax plant. The oil is obtained by pressing, sometimes involving a lot of chemicals for more industrial uses. Some refer to the ‘edible’ oil as flaxseed oil, and the industrial use as linseed oil. But the fatty acid composition of flaxseed oil or linseed oil (used interchangeably) are both PUFA rich.
Linseed oil works well as a paint due to its high level of PUFAs — all of those double bonds make them extremely prone to oxidation. In fact, linseed oil is classified as a “drying oil,” meaning it transitions from a liquid to a solid film through oxidative reactions.
“When this flax oil is exposed to air, the double bonds of ALA react with oxygen and result in relatively soft, durable film. This property is known as ‘drying’ quality of linseed oil.”1
However, newer petroleum products started to enter the market in place of linseed oil since they could be made cheaper, and this led to the reduced reliance on flax.2 So, the flax industry needed to find another market for it — enter the health food market and lots of marketing!
“50 years ago, paints and varnishes were made of soy oil, safflower oil, and linseed (flax seed) oil. Then chemists learned how to make paint from petroleum, which was much cheaper. As a result, the huge seed oil industry found its crop increasingly hard to sell.
Around the same time, farmers were experimenting with poisons to make their pigs get fatter with less food, and they discovered that corn and soy beans served the purpose, in a legal way.
The crops that had been grown for the paint industry came to be used for animal food. Then these foods that made animals get fat cheaply came to be promoted as foods for humans, but they had to direct attention away from the fact that they are very fattening. The ‘cholesterol’ focus was just one of the marketing tools used by the oil industry.
Unfortunately it [the false claims about cholesterol & saturated fat] is the one that has lasted the longest, even after the unsaturated oils were proven to cause heart disease as well as cancer.” ~ Dr. Ray Peat
Flax Is High in Estrogenic Compounds Too
Have you ever noticed that flax oils can only be purchased in dark containers, and must be stored in the fridge? (They oxidize in the presence of heat and oxygen). Can you imagine what happens when you consume this and put it in your warm, oxygen-rich body? (The inside of our body should be 98.6 deg F.) And yes, flax contains some fiber but still has a lot of PUFAs.
•Per 100 grams:
◦The oil extracted out of flax contains 100 grams of fat with 14.3 grams of linoleic acid and 53.4 grams of ALA.
◦Whole flax contains less fat (42.4 grams) since there is fiber, but still 5.9 grams linoleic acid and 22.8 grams ALA.
You can get these fibers in from other foods without all this PUFA. But there are other negative health consequences outside of the high susceptibility to oxidation. Flaxseeds contain a type of phytoestrogen called lignans. Phytoestrogens act like estrogen in the body (and we do not need more estrogen in modern times). “[L]ignans that are structurally similar to known estrogenic compounds.”3
Another example of a well-known phytoestrogen is isoflavones in soy. Well, flax is 20 times stronger than soy when it comes to the estrogenic impact!
Dr. Hobbins is a former surgeon who pioneered breast cancer detection through mammography and thermography. Dr. Hobbins and Wendy Sellers have hundreds of thermogram images showing striking visual evidence that estrogenic foods (including flax) promote vascularization and angiogenesis in the breast tissue, increasing the risk of breast cancer.4
Misinformed health care workers and manipulated studies are promoting these phytoestrogenic foods as cancer-preventing — when instead they could be making matters worse!
Add on top of this that the accumulation of PUFAs in tissues promotes the action of estrogen by activating aromatase AND people with lower metabolic rates are pooping less and less (pooping isn’t just to get rid of food waste, it is also a way to get rid of used hormones and other toxins in the body! So not pooping every day will cause some estrogen re-absorption).
In this estrogenic and PUFA rich world — no wonder hormonal imbalances are rampant, and testosterone is plummeting in men! Many people believe that they are LOW in estrogen due to bloodwork. Unfortunately, serum estrogen levels are NOT representative of estrogen that has been stored in tissues. Estrogen can be low in plasma, but high in tissues.5
And when stored estrogen is assessed, most people are estrogen dominant due to high PUFA diets and exposure to environmental estrogens from pesticides and plastics. And for women, add on many years of birth control loading up on exogenous estrogen! So you likely do not need more estrogenic foods (like flax).
A simple way to gauge estrogen storage in fat and tissues is a simple prolactin blood test, as prolactin blood tests can be used as a proxy for stored estrogen since estrogen promotes the production of prolactin. Ideally prolactin is less than 10 ng/mL.
Excess PUFA Lowers Thyroid Function
Another reason to not eat flax — excess PUFA consumption lowers thyroid and metabolism — as thyroid hormone (the master metabolic regulator) is blocked at the production,6 transport,7 and cellular action8 steps by PUFA.
“Fatty acids inhibited the binding of T3 to both receptor proteins (TR-alpha and TR-beta) … The effectiveness of inhibition depends on the chain length and degree of saturation of the fatty acids.”9
Further, PUFAs block proper carb metabolism more so than saturated fats10 by inhibiting the function of the PDH enzyme11,12 and cytochrome C oxidase13 — two vital components in glucose metabolism. And the negative effect on glucose metabolism increases with chain length and degree of unsaturation of the fatty acids.14 In fact, flax consumption has been shown to make you more insulin resistant and hinder carb utilization.15,16
Flax Inhibits Cholesterol Production
Another undesirable trait of flax is that it lowers endogenous production of cholesterol — which may sound good initially. But cholesterol is the building block of steroid hormones, and lowering cholesterol through estrogenic foods like flax will lower testosterone in males and progesterone in females. Plus, anything that suppresses your cholesterol synthesis increases the risk of cancer (like statins).
The best way to lower elevated cholesterol levels is to improve thyroid (which will still allow the body to make adequate androgens). Hormones are a downstream effect and should not try to be manipulated through estrogenic-rich foods. Fix metabolism and thyroid health, and hormonal balance will come easier! Instead of flax, try:
Reducing PUFA consumption and instead prioritize saturated fats
Lowering plastic exposure
Consuming carbohydrates to boost thyroid and metabolism (adequate thyroid is essential for both the production of progesterone and the detoxification of estrogen by the liver)
Supplementing with bio identical progesterone, as needed (adequate progesterone levels help keep estrogen in check)
Ensuring adequate Vitamin B6 consumption (serves as a prolactin inhibitor)
Transform Your Health — One Step at a Time
Ashley and her sister Sarah have put together a truly groundbreaking step-by-step course called “Rooted in Resilience.” They have compiled what clearly is the best application of Dr. Ray Peat’s work on Bioenergetic Medicine that I have ever seen.
It is so good that I am using the core of their program to teach the many Health Coaches that I am in the process of training for the new Mercola Health Clinics I am opening this fall. It took these women working nearly full-time on this project for a year to create it.
This has to be one of the absolute best values for health education I have ever seen. If you want to understand why you struggle with health problems and then have a clear program on how to reverse those challenges, then this is the course for you.
It is precisely the type of program I wish I would have had access to when I got out of medical school. I fumbled around for decades before I reached the conclusion they discuss in the course and share with you so you can restore your cellular energy production and recover your health.
Select and eat the right foods to heal your metabolism and improve glucose utilization
Balance your hormones to help reduce anxiety, weight gain and sleep disturbances
Use reverse dieting to increase your calories without gaining weight and tanking your metabolism, all while improving your energy levels
Heal your gut for proper immune function, mood and weight management
Tweak your diet and lifestyle habits to improve your mindset and mental health
Crush your fitness goals with ease and get your life back on track
Master the most essential habits for health with bonus guides, including over 100 meal plans to take the stress out of meal time planning and shopping, and so much more!
Learn more about Rooted in Resilience here.
About the Author
Ashley Armstrong is the cofounder of Angel Acres Egg Co., which specializes in low-PUFA (polyunsaturated fat) eggs that are shipped to all 50 states (join waitlist here), and Nourish Cooperative, which ships low-PUFA pork, beef, cheese, A2 dairy and traditional sourdough to all 50 states. Waitlists will reopen shortly.
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
Considering global biosecurity is one of the primary tactics chosen to usher in a totalitarian One World Government, it’s clear that more pandemics are in our future, and a weaponized bird flu seems likely
Historically, natural avian influenza (H5N1) never posed a threat to mankind, but scientists have created a hybrid with human pandemic potential
If we do end up with a lethal human bird flu, there’s every reason to suspect it was manmade. There’s also every reason to suspect a bird flu vaccine will be either ineffective, hazardous or both
H5N1 (bird flu) is now affecting mammals at a rate not previously seen, including skunks, bears, seals, foxes, minks and even dolphins. The infection is also spreading between mammals. This is a new development that has scientists worried. If the virus is mutating (or being mutated) to spread among mammals, the jump to humans may not be far behind
Already, the U.S. and other countries are stockpiling H5N1 vaccine “just in case.” While some traditional vaccines are in the lineup, mRNA shots tweaked to target H5N1 are also being planned, and they probably won’t need to undergo additional testing over and beyond what was done for the COVID jabs
Bird flu has always been a fraud, which is why I wrote my New York Times best-selling book “The Great Bird Flu Hoax,” nearly 15 years ago. President George Bush spent over $7 billion dollars and warned that more than 2 million Americans could die.1 The reality is that no one in the U.S. died from bird flu.
Fast forward 15 years, and now global biosecurity is one of the primary tactics chosen to usher in a totalitarian One World Government, so more pandemics are undoubtedly in our future. In the spring of 2022, Bill Gates warned that another pandemic will emerge, and that this yet-to-come pandemic “will get attention this time.”2
Based on the news chatter emerging right now, a weaponized bird flu seems likely. In a March 30, 2022, CenterPoint interview, former director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Redfield, more than hinted at this possibility, saying:3
“I believe the great pandemic is still in the future, and that’s going to be a bird flu pandemic for man. It’s going to have significant mortality in the 10-50% range. It’s gonna be trouble.”
Avian Flu Posed No Threat Until Scientists Weaponized It
Historically, natural avian influenza (H5N1) never posed a threat to mankind, but then scientists started tinkering with it, creating a hybrid with human pandemic potential.4 Some of that research has been undertaken in Pentagon-funded biolabs in Ukraine.5,6,7
Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) have also funded gain-of-function research on H5N1.8 One scientist whose work on H5N1 has been funded by both Fauci and Gates is Dr. Yoshihiro Kawaoka.9
In one experiment, Kawaoka mixed bird flu virus with the Spanish flu virus, resulting in a highly lethal respiratory virus with human transmission capability. Kawaoka has also played around with mixtures of H5N1 and the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) virus, creating an airborne hybrid10,11,12 capable of evading the human immune system, effectively rendering humans defenseless against it,13 and this extremely risky research was done at a biosafety level 2 lab!14
The bird flu has been manipulated and tinkered with in a variety of different ways, making it both airborne (which it was not initially) and capable of cross-species infection.
Fauci also funded the work of virologist Ron Fouchier, a Dutch researcher whose team created an airborne version of the bird flu using a combination of genetic engineering and serial infection of ferrets.15 So, the bird flu has been manipulated and tinkered with in a variety of different ways, making it both airborne (which it was not initially) and capable of cross-species infection.
In 2012, the work of Kawaoka and Fouchier sparked widespread concern about gain-of-function research, as it was readily recognized that it could accidentally cause a human pandemic.16,17
As a result, the U.S. government issued a temporary ban on gain-of-function research on certain viruses in 2014, which remained in place until December 2017.18 We now know this ban was circumvented by Fauci, who continued to fund gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in China during those years.
It now looks as though weaponized bird flu might eventually be released to achieve the geopolitical aims of the technocratic cabal that is trying to give the World Health Organization a monopoly on pandemic decision-making.
Bird flu is widespread among poultry and wild birds19 in the U.S.,20 but the natural virus is not very transmissible or lethal to humans. So, if we do end up with a lethal human bird flu, there’s every reason to suspect it was manmade. There’s also every reason to suspect a bird flu vaccine will be either ineffective, hazardous or both.
Bird Flu Has Spread to Mammals
According to a February 9, 2023, ABC News report,21 H5N1 (bird flu) is also affecting mammals at a rate not previously seen, including skunks, bears, seals, foxes, minks and even dolphins. University of Massachusetts Boston virologist Nichola Hill told ABC News:
“The size, range and number of species affected by this outbreak is unprecedented … That’s not really how bird flu should behave.”
While sporadic infections among mammals have been reported for 20 years, the virus now appears to be spreading between mammals, as opposed to being limited to individual mammals being infected from eating an infected bird.
This is a brand-new development that has scientists worried. If the virus is mutating (or being mutated) to spread among mammals, the jump to humans may not be far behind.
In 2022, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Influenza Division tracked more than 50 human avian influenza cases in seven countries and, while extremely rare, the CDC does anticipate more infections to occur. As noted in its March 17, 2023, H5N1 update:22
“To date, HPAI [highly-pathogenic avian influenza] A(H5N1) viruses currently circulating in birds and poultry, with spillover to mammals, and those that have caused human infections do not have the ability to easily bind to receptors that predominate in the human upper respiratory tract. Therefore, the current risk to the public from HPAI A(H5N1) viruses remains low.
However, because of the potential for influenza viruses to rapidly evolve and the wide global prevalence of HPAI A(H5N1) viruses in wild birds and poultry outbreaks, continued sporadic human infections are anticipated.
Continued comprehensive surveillance of these viruses in wild birds, poultry, mammals, and people worldwide, and frequent reassessments are critical to determine the public health risk, along with ongoing preparedness efforts.”
Canadian experts also fear the bird flu’s current momentum has the potential to become a human pandemic. As reported by Global News March 25, 2023:23
“The current outbreak circulating North and South America is known as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. It has killed record numbers of birds and infected mammals.
Although human cases remain rare, Shayan Sharif, a professor and associate dean with the Ontario Veterinary College … warned the virus is ‘gathering momentum’ and becoming more of a human threat.
‘Various pieces of the puzzle are coming together for this virus to become transmissible among humans, he told Global News. ‘This particular virus has the potential to become a pandemic virus, and if it does, then we have to be absolutely ready because the fatality rate of this virus could be far greater than what we saw for COVID-19.'”
Current Bird Flu Countermeasures Are the Wrong Approach
Just as we’ve seen with the COVID pandemic, health authorities insist there’s only one solution to bird flu epidemics, and that is vaccination. Meanwhile, that strategy is making the situation worse.
By culling all chickens whenever a single case is detected basically guarantees that natural immunity will never develop. A far saner strategy would be to eliminate the chickens that die from the infection but keep those who survive it alive.
An interesting article by regenerative farmer Joel Salatin, in which he discusses the bird flu cycle, was published by Brownstone Institute in mid-March 2023:24
“If thinking people learned only one thing from the COVID pandemic, it was that official government narratives are politically slanted and often untrue. In this latest HPAI outbreak, perhaps the most egregious departure from truth is the notion that the birds have died as a result of the disease and that euthanasia for survivors is the best and only option …
To be sure, HPAI is and can be deadly, but it never kills everything. The policy of mass extermination without regard to immunity, without even researching why some birds flourish while all around are dying, is insane. The most fundamental principles of animal husbandry and breeding demand that farmers select for healthy immune systems. We farmers have been doing that for millennia …
But in its wisdom, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA—Usduh) has no interest in selecting, protecting, and then propagating the healthy survivors. The policy is clear and simple: kill everything that ever contacted the diseased birds. The second part of the policy is also simple: find a vaccine to stop HPAI …
The scorched earth policy is the only option even though it doesn’t seem to be working. In fact, the cycles are coming faster and seem to be affecting more birds. Someone ought to question the efficacy.”
Bird Flu Solutions That Make Sense
As noted by Salatin, it’s well-recognized among farmers that cramped quarters and having too many chicken farms too close together, geographically, is the problem. “The USDA and the industry desperately want to blame wild birds, backyard flocks, and dirty shoes rather than looking in the mirror and realizing this is nature’s way of screaming ‘Enough!'” Salatin writes.
The answer is relatively simple. Save birds that survive the infection and breed them. That way, future generations will have natural immunity. “If a flock gets HPAI, let it run its course. It’ll kill the ones it’ll kill but in a few days the survivors will be obvious. Keep those and put them in a breeding program,” Salatin writes.
Secondly, chicken farmers can also ward off epidemics by focusing on optimal herd sizes. For example, wild turkeys stay in flocks of no more than a couple of hundred. Wild pigs rarely exceed groups of 100. For chickens, optimal herd size is about 1,000, according to Salatin. He goes on to explain:
“An elderly poultry industry scientist visited our farm once and told me that if houses would break up chickens into 1,000-bird groups it would virtually eliminate diseases.
He said it was okay to have 10,000 birds in a house as long as they were in 1,000-bird units. That way their social structure can function in a natural interaction. Animals have a hierarchy of bullies and timids. That social structure breaks down above optimal size …
While I don’t want to sound flippant or above HPAI susceptibility, incident rates definitely indicate less vulnerability in well-managed pastured flocks.
Creating an immune-building protocol surely merits research as much as overriding the immune system with vaccines and trying to stay ahead of disease mutations and adaptations with human cleverness. How about humbly seeking nature for solutions rather than relying on hubris?
The parallels between HPAI expert orthodoxy and COVID orthodoxy are too numerous to mention … The HPAI worry feeds food worry, which makes people clamor for government security. People will accept just about anything if they’re afraid … Think it through and then embrace a more natural remedy: well-managed decentralized pastured poultry with appropriate flock sizes.”
Pay Attention to Upcoming Narratives
As we move forward, keep an eye on the narratives we’re being fed. Again, if bird flu becomes a human epidemic or pandemic, there are plenty of reasons to suspect it’s a weaponized virus, and the “solution” offered will be the same as that for COVID-19: “Get vaccinated.”
Considering the widespread harm caused by the COVID-19 mRNA shots, can we really trust that fast-tracked bird flu shots will be any safer or more effective? Already, the U.S. and other countries are stockpiling H5N1 vaccine25 “just in case,” which is telling.
While some traditional vaccines are in the lineup, mRNA shots tweaked to target H5N1 are also being planned, and they probably won’t need to undergo additional testing over and beyond what was already done for the COVID jabs.
This even though recent attempts to make an mRNA-based influenza jab have met with failure. As reported by Reuters:26
“Some of the world’s leading makers of flu vaccines say they could make hundreds of millions of bird flu shots for humans within months if a new strain of avian influenza ever jumps across the species divide …
In a pandemic, vaccine manufacturers would shift production of seasonal flu vaccines and instead make shots tailored to the new outbreak when needed …
Many of the potential pandemic shots are pre-approved by regulators, based on data from human trials showing the vaccines are safe and prompt an immune response, a process already used with seasonal flu vaccines.
This means they might not require further human trials, even if they have to be tweaked to better match whichever strain does jump to humans. Data on how well the vaccines actually protect against infection would be gathered in real-time …
Experts have long advocated for new approaches in developing vaccines, both for seasonal and pandemic flu. COVID proved the potential of mRNA technology to adapt more quickly to changing viruses because the vaccines use genetic information from the pathogen, rather than having to grow the virus itself.
Moderna’s mRNA vaccine research actually began with pandemic flu, and was modified for COVID, said Raffael Nachbagauer, executive director of infectious diseases at Moderna.
The company plans to launch a small human trial of an mRNA pandemic flu vaccine tailored to the new avian influenza subtype in the first half of 2023, he said, adding Moderna could respond ‘very quickly’ in an outbreak scenario. The results will be closely watched, as the data on Moderna’s seasonal flu candidate was mixed.”
To think that an mRNA-based jab against a weaponized bird flu will be any safer than the shots for COVID-19 would be naïve in the extreme, if you ask me, yet you can be sure we’ll be told otherwise, if bird flu does end up spreading among the human population.
Be Prepared
One of the best things I did in my youth was join the Boy Scouts. Their motto “Be Prepared” has been enormously useful my entire life. Well, it applies to bird flu as well. While we don’t know for sure, as no studies have been done, it is highly likely that many of the same protocols used in early outpatient treatment of COVID will also work for bird flu, since they are both viral respiratory pathogens.
As a first basic prevention step, optimize your vitamin D (the ideal range is between 60 ng/ml and 80 ng/ml). Be sure to measure it to confirm, as there is no way to know what your vitamin D level is without doing a blood test.
Summer is nearly here, so ditch your oral vitamin supplement and strip off your clothes and get out in the sun around solar noon, which is 1 p.m. for most people in the U.S. To learn more, download my “Vitamin D in the Prevention of COVID-19” report, available on stopCOVIDcold.com.
In case you do get sick, I would strongly advise you to purchase a nebulizer so that you can nebulize hydrogen peroxide at first signs of symptoms. Just go to my Bitchute channel and look for my peroxide videos. They have full instructions on how to do this.
At present, the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) seems to have one of the best COVID treatment protocols. It’s called I-CARE and can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.27 They also have a treatment protocol for RSV and influenza. Print them out and make sure you have the basic supplements in your medicine cabinet.
Considering global biosecurity is one of the primary tactics chosen to usher in a totalitarian One World Government, it’s clear that more pandemics are in our future, and a weaponized bird flu seems likely
Historically, natural avian influenza (H5N1) never posed a threat to mankind, but scientists have created a hybrid with human pandemic potential
If we do end up with a lethal human bird flu, there’s every reason to suspect it was manmade. There’s also every reason to suspect a bird flu vaccine will be either ineffective, hazardous or both
H5N1 (bird flu) is now affecting mammals at a rate not previously seen, including skunks, bears, seals, foxes, minks and even dolphins. The infection is also spreading between mammals. This is a new development that has scientists worried. If the virus is mutating (or being mutated) to spread among mammals, the jump to humans may not be far behind
Already, the U.S. and other countries are stockpiling H5N1 vaccine “just in case.” While some traditional vaccines are in the lineup, mRNA shots tweaked to target H5N1 are also being planned, and they probably won’t need to undergo additional testing over and beyond what was done for the COVID jabs
Bird flu has always been a fraud, which is why I wrote my New York Times best-selling book “The Great Bird Flu Hoax,” nearly 15 years ago. President George Bush spent over $7 billion dollars and warned that more than 2 million Americans could die.1 The reality is that no one in the U.S. died from bird flu.
Fast forward 15 years, and now global biosecurity is one of the primary tactics chosen to usher in a totalitarian One World Government, so more pandemics are undoubtedly in our future. In the spring of 2022, Bill Gates warned that another pandemic will emerge, and that this yet-to-come pandemic “will get attention this time.”2
Based on the news chatter emerging right now, a weaponized bird flu seems likely. In a March 30, 2022, CenterPoint interview, former director for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Robert Redfield, more than hinted at this possibility, saying:3
“I believe the great pandemic is still in the future, and that’s going to be a bird flu pandemic for man. It’s going to have significant mortality in the 10-50% range. It’s gonna be trouble.
However, because of the potential for influenza viruses to rapidly evolve and the wide global prevalence of HPAI A(H5N1) viruses in wild birds and poultry outbreaks, continued sporadic human infections are anticipated.
Continued comprehensive surveillance of these viruses in wild birds, poultry, mammals, and people worldwide, and frequent reassessments are critical to determine the public health risk, along with ongoing preparedness efforts.”
“The current outbreak circulating North and South America is known as H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b. It has killed record numbers of birds and infected mammals.
Although human cases remain rare, Shayan Sharif, a professor and associate dean with the Ontario Veterinary College … warned the virus is ‘gathering momentum’ and becoming more of a human threat.
‘Various pieces of the puzzle are coming together for this virus to become transmissible among humans, he told Global News. ‘This particular virus has the potential to become a pandemic virus, and if it does, then we have to be absolutely ready because the fatality rate of this virus could be far greater than what we saw for COVID-19.'”
“If thinking people learned only one thing from the COVID pandemic, it was that official government narratives are politically slanted and often untrue. In this latest HPAI outbreak, perhaps the most egregious departure from truth is the notion that the birds have died as a result of the disease and that euthanasia for survivors is the best and only option …
To be sure, HPAI is and can be deadly, but it never kills everything. The policy of mass extermination without regard to immunity, without even researching why some birds flourish while all around are dying, is insane. The most fundamental principles of animal husbandry and breeding demand that farmers select for healthy immune systems. We farmers have been doing that for millennia …
But in its wisdom, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA—Usduh) has no interest in selecting, protecting, and then propagating the healthy survivors. The policy is clear and simple: kill everything that ever contacted the diseased birds. The second part of the policy is also simple: find a vaccine to stop HPAI …
The scorched earth policy is the only option even though it doesn’t seem to be working. In fact, the cycles are coming faster and seem to be affecting more birds. Someone ought to question the efficacy.”
“An elderly poultry industry scientist visited our farm once and told me that if houses would break up chickens into 1,000-bird groups it would virtually eliminate diseases.
He said it was okay to have 10,000 birds in a house as long as they were in 1,000-bird units. That way their social structure can function in a natural interaction. Animals have a hierarchy of bullies and timids. That social structure breaks down above optimal size …
While I don’t want to sound flippant or above HPAI susceptibility, incident rates definitely indicate less vulnerability in well-managed pastured flocks.
Creating an immune-building protocol surely merits research as much as overriding the immune system with vaccines and trying to stay ahead of disease mutations and adaptations with human cleverness. How about humbly seeking nature for solutions rather than relying on hubris?
The parallels between HPAI expert orthodoxy and COVID orthodoxy are too numerous to mention … The HPAI worry feeds food worry, which makes people clamor for government security. People will accept just about anything if they’re afraid … Think it through and then embrace a more natural remedy: well-managed decentralized pastured poultry with appropriate flock sizes.”
“Some of the world’s leading makers of flu vaccines say they could make hundreds of millions of bird flu shots for humans within months if a new strain of avian influenza ever jumps across the species divide …
In a pandemic, vaccine manufacturers would shift production of seasonal flu vaccines and instead make shots tailored to the new outbreak when needed …
Many of the potential pandemic shots are pre-approved by regulators, based on data from human trials showing the vaccines are safe and prompt an immune response, a process already used with seasonal flu vaccines.
This means they might not require further human trials, even if they have to be tweaked to better match whichever strain does jump to humans. Data on how well the vaccines actually protect against infection would be gathered in real-time …
Experts have long advocated for new approaches in developing vaccines, both for seasonal and pandemic flu. COVID proved the potential of mRNA technology to adapt more quickly to changing viruses because the vaccines use genetic information from the pathogen, rather than having to grow the virus itself.
Moderna’s mRNA vaccine research actually began with pandemic flu, and was modified for COVID, said Raffael Nachbagauer, executive director of infectious diseases at Moderna.
The company plans to launch a small human trial of an mRNA pandemic flu vaccine tailored to the new avian influenza subtype in the first half of 2023, he said, adding Moderna could respond ‘very quickly’ in an outbreak scenario. The results will be closely watched, as the data on Moderna’s seasonal flu candidate was mixed.”
Care
Optimize Vit D 80 ng/ml). Be sure to measure it to confirm, as there is no way to know what your vitamin D level is without doing a blood test.
Summer is nearly here, so ditch your oral vitamin supplement and strip off your clothes and get out in the sun around solar noon, which is 1 p.m. for most people in the U.S. To learn more, download my “Vitamin D in the Prevention of COVID-19” report, available on stopCOVIDcold.com.
In case you do get sick, I would strongly advise you to purchase a nebulizer so that you can nebulize hydrogen peroxide at first signs of symptoms. Just go to my Bitchute channel and look for my peroxide videos. They have full instructions on how to do this.
The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) seems to have one of the best COVID treatment protocols. It’s called I-CARE and can be downloaded from covid19criticalcare.com.27 They also have a treatment protocol for RSV and influenza. Print them out and make sure you have the basic supplements in your medicine cabinet.
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
In Part 2 of her report, investigative journalist Corey Lynn describes key organizations pulling the strings behind the scenes, allowing them to “operate as ghosts without transparency or accountability”
Unrestricted privileges and layers of immunity are enjoyed by powerful organizations worldwide, which use them to exert control over the globe
A little-known entity headquartered in Washington, D.C. — the Organization of American States (OAS) — controls the western hemisphere
OAS is involved in elections throughout the globe, carrying out “electoral observation missions”: it oversaw a recent election in Brazil that many residents consider stolen, and the U.S. requested OAS election services in 2016 for the first time in history
The U.S. funds more than 50% of OAS’ budget; however, each of OAS’ “specialized agencies and entities” has its own budget and funding, with deep globalist connections
As the global cabal continues to wage its war against the sovereignty of humanity, we’re continuing to expose the unrestricted privileges and layers of immunity enjoyed by powerful organizations worldwide.
In November 2022, we featured Part 1 of investigative journalist Corey Lynn’s Laundering With Immunity report, which revealed 76 international organizations and banks that enjoy and leverage these immunities, privileges and tax exemptions to maintain power and control.
“These aren’t just ordinary organizations,” Lynn explains. “They happen to be the prime organizations that run the new world order globalists’ agendas against humanity, and they have hundreds of NGOs working with and through them.”1
Part 2 of the report,2 discussed in detail in the video above,3 goes even deeper into key organizations pulling the strings behind the scenes, allowing them to “operate as ghosts without transparency or accountability.” “Hold onto your seats,” Lynn says.4
Layers of Immunity Allow for World Domination
To understand the threat that comes along with granting organizations the power to operate outside of laws and constitutions, it helps to understand how deep the layers of immunity go. The International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), passed by the U.S. Congress in 1945, granted dozens of organizations with privileges that equate to that of diplomats.
Each organization’s headquarters receives additional protections from the government of the country in which it’s located, via “headquarters agreements.” Further, the protected organizations can extend their immunities to individuals, organizations or banks working with them, including family members of staff. According to Lynn:5
“To put it in layman terms, a wealthy bunch of corrupt families got together centuries ago and plotted how they wanted to control the world. The challenge was in how they would get around constitutions, state laws and international laws so they could operate outside the system that the rest of humanity had to function within.
This would afford them the ability to move like ghosts, transfer wealth, and camouflage all of their schemes with false storylines as they secured more and more control with each decade, while alleging how ‘transparent’ they are.
Getting the banking systems into place, such as the Bank for International Settlements, the Federal Reserve, the World Bank Group, and central banks was the key step in building the ghost-like infrastructure. Making sure BlackRock and Vanguard had top shareholder positions in every major corporation in order to bend and squeeze them into submission, was also a necessary evil.”
The Little-Known Entity in Control of the Western Hemisphere
After establishing the banking systems such as the Federal Reserve, the globalists needed a way to act on international laws and treaties, manipulating them as needed to maintain control. This is where the United Nations, which enjoys 22 IOIA immunities and privileges, comes in, along with a much lesser-known entity — the Organization of American States (OAS).6
OAS is headquartered in Washington, D.C., just outside of the White House, yet it’s rarely mentioned by U.S. media. First started in 1890 as the International Union of American Republics, OAS has gone through several name changes over the decades and now operates in 35 member states in the Western Hemisphere, in an area that’s home to more than 1 billion people.
It manages the Western Hemisphere and also hosts the World Health Organization’s regional office via the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), which was originally founded in 1902 to control the spread of epidemics between countries.
“PAHO is the oldest and largest regional health organization, and has long coordinated with the OAS through projects, funding, goals, and even shared a building at one point. Today, PAHO is a ‘specialized organization’ of the OAS,” Lynn says.7 OAS, meanwhile, works alongside the UN, but is not under its control. Lynn continues:8
“The WHO is to the UN as PAHO is to the OAS. Two very powerful organizations that are in lock-step, consisting of member states that account for the entire global population, and the OAS with headquarters just steps away from the White House and the UN Foundation even closer, with immunities and privileges that afford them the ability to keep forging ahead with the New World Order agenda.
… Their budget may be far smaller than the UN, but their reach isn’t. OAS has also granted permanent observer status to over 72 states, as well as to the European Union, who all enjoy immunities and privileges.”
Further, all of OAS’ agencies and entities are granted their immunities and privileges, via their headquarters agreement with the U.S. and other agreements. Here’s just a sampling of these OAS entities:9
Inter-American Council for Integral Development
Inter-American Juridical Committee
Inter-American Children’s Institute
Inter-American Commission on Women
Inter-American Indian Institute
Inter-American Agency for Cooperation Development
Justice Studies Center of The Americas
Inter-American Committee Against Terrorism
Inter-American Committee on Natural Disaster Reduction
OAS Enjoys ‘Unprecedented Level of Protection,’ Power
The immunities and privileges granted to OAS allows it to avoid both transparency and accountability. Under IOAI, for instance, OAS gets the following benefits:10
Property and assets immune from suit and judicial process
Immunity from search and seizure of property and assets
Archives are inviolable
Exempt from all forms of taxes
Admission of officers, employees and their family members without checks from customs
Officers and employees exempt from all legal actions relating to work activities
No alien registration or fingerprinting of employees and immediate family members
OAS is also involved in elections throughout the globe, carrying out “electoral observation missions.” “And by ‘observation,'” Lynn notes, “that means financing a team to travel to the country, monitor, analyze, verify compliance, be a channel between conflict, make recommendations, and provide reports that carry weight by ‘extensive and recognized technical expertise.'”11
OAS oversaw a recent election in Brazil that many residents consider stolen, and the U.S. requested OAS election services in 2016 for the first time in history. OAS observers were deployed to 13 U.S. states.12 Agreements also exist beyond government entities into the Big Tech sector and beyond. Lynn explains:13
“The OAS doesn’t just work with governments; they have a registry with over 465 civil society groups that work in different areas for the member states. The registry provides the exchange of information to assist in creating governmental policies, which includes dialogue between governments, international organizations and the civil society groups.
The International Planned Parenthood Federation is part of the 465 civil society groups, along with Lawyers Without Borders, Amnesty International, National Wildlife Federation, Center for Reproductive Rights, Center for International Environmental Law, Open Society Institute, and Rotary, just to name a few.
George Soros was a keynote speaker for the OAS Lecture Series of The Americas in 2006. Additionally, they have an OAS Consortium of Universities they work with to provide training programs and offer scholarship opportunities.”
Who Funds the OAS?
OAS has a budget of about $142 million. The U.S. funds more than 50% of it. However, each of OAS’ “specialized agencies and entities” has its own budget and funding, with deep globalist connections. For instance, Lynn notes:14
“Take PAHO for example, whose operating budget was increased in 2022-2023 to over $881 million. Under the agreement between PAHO and the WHO, that increases the amount the WHO must contribute to PAHO, bringing it to over $291 million. The Rockefeller Foundation, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and numerous other globalists all fund PAHO.”
Digging deeper, OAS has five areas of funding, one of which is “trust funds.” The nonprofit Trust for the Americas, which has conducted projects in 24 countries, is just one of those trusts. It’s received funding from USAID, Microsoft, Mastercard, Citi, Walmart and U.S. embassies, for starters. Other corporate giants also contribute to OAS funds. Among them:15
Amazon Web Services
Cisco Systems
Citibank
Ford Foundation
Google
Hilton Foundation
Meta Platforms
Microsoft
The United Nations
A ‘Powerhouse of Ruin’ Is Coming
Unless the immunities granted to OAS, the UN, the Federal Reserve and others are rescinded, and multiple governments pull out of these organizations, Lynn says, “no battle can be won.”
Meanwhile, Agenda 2030, aimed at reducing middle-class’ consumption of basic goods and energy, which includes limiting, with an eye toward eliminating, property rights and private ownership for future generations, is barreling toward us. She explains:16
“Together, the BIS [Bank for International Settlements], Central Banks, UN, OAS, and the other international organizations and banks enjoying immunities and privileges, are a powerhouse that has the ability to move undetected, behind closed doors, with no transparency or accountability, and move their agendas forward with little to no legal ramifications.
While people go about their days putting their children to bed, sending them off to school, getting themselves to work, and cooking a family dinner, these masterminds are plotting out everyone’s future in a gradual manner that most don’t recognize as the global takeover that it is.
And yet, the clock ticks down as they attempt to accomplish their ultimate goal in less than seven years — a digital world with a digital workforce, a genderless society with no individualism or self-identity, a transhumanist decay where humans meld with robots, in an environment where these powers hold the keys to control everything one needs to survive on, all with the exception of one thing — one’s soul.”
Three Steps to Fight Back — and Win
All is not yet lost, however, and Lynn offers three solid strategies to attack this globalist threat:17
Share this information far and wide, via journalists, social media, podcasts and your community. “The louder we are and the more we push, the harder it becomes for them to push back, and they are forced to change directions and switch up their game, and they get sloppy,” she says.
Tell your legislator that the immunities and privileges granted to OAS and other organizations need to be revoked, and “demand that their country pull out of the UN and OAS.” Lynn adds, “They need to nullify the Federal Reserve and get out of the central banks and build state banks and a sovereign state that doesn’t rely on the federal government.”
Stop funding this enslavement system. This means not doing business with associated banks, stocks, apps and devices, and not shopping at big box stores or using convenience systems that act as forms of entrapment. Also, Lynn adds, “Stop complying with so-called rules, mandates, and regulations that are meant to break you. These people think they own you — prove them wrong.”
Index: please click on the link for the index please?
Canceling Words To Control The Future
Canceling words isn’t about protecting sensitive or abused minorities. It’s about laying the foundation for a homogeneous, subservient, and dumbed-down society – by design.
“You are your word,” my father once told me after he caught me lying. We had just finished dinner. He gave me a brush and pointed at the dishes. He never mentioned my faux pas again.
“I am my word.”
Coherent is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Subscribe
I pondered what he meant while staring at the soap bubbles – even decades after I finished the dishes.
I must explain something about my father. He inhaled words. He had books everywhere, including some 3,000 in his forest cabin. He built extra shelves that hung from the ceiling after he ran out of wall space. He read broadly, from fact to fiction, history to poetry, with a fondness for diversity. He sorted the books with a freakish obsession – as if he was trying to unscramble the fabric of human knowledge or purpose.
One shelf would have books dealing with communism on the left, socialism in the middle, and capitalism on the right. The shades of the author’s ideology determined if a book would end up an inch here or there. Another shelf would represent the grey scale between tyranny and democracy. Then there was the slide from ancient energy medicine to modern medicine—and, of course, from peace to war.
And so on. Rows after rows of history, cultures, and narratives, graded meticulously from left to right, from East to West, frozen in time, black on white.
By the time my father passed in 2013, it had become evident that his obsession with literary time capsules had a deeper purpose – whether he knew it or not.
Google had taken over the search algorithms, and people accessed mostly digital content. The search results and the definitions of words were suddenly malleable. And this was just the beginning.
Today, narratives are altered in real-time to influence collective belief systems, and certain words have become “toxic.” You could be toast for mentioning a color, gender, race, faculty, or disability in the wrong context because it might upset the sensibilities of someone – even if that someone is composed of an acronym.
Protecting minorities – whether gender or race-related – has become part of the prevailing narrative of an increasingly “woke” community. And as in many other media-propagated topics, the truth is precisely the opposite of the prevailing, media-dominated version – carefully constructed to bring us closer to our predetermined destiny.
Entrance/Leave of a 15 minute city and its hidden function.
The Future Wrapped Inside A Language Riddle
Only a few years ago, I would have had difficulty entertaining the idea that society’s significant events in the past century(ies) and the present – wars and major cultural shifts, for example – are engineered. Is there an invisible instance who holds the grand joystick and writes and enforces long-term plans for our planet? Sometimes we can get a glimpse of what comes next from public channels, an example being the pandemic plan from 2010
2 , although, for some reason, few people take this seriously.
After April 2020, I began taking the plans more seriously. The planet decided to lock down in lockstep overnight – taking billions of people for a fantasy ride with almost no resistance – an astonishing planetary-wide synchronization of self-harm that chaos theory alone couldn’t explain. There had to be not just years but decades of preparation.
Today I believe that for longer than anyone cares to fathom, we’ve been munching junk foods and entertainment inside Plato’s Cave, where the appearance of “free society” and “democracy” is a form of shadow puppetry designed to maximize our dopamine levels.
None of our supposed leaders and public figureheads – from political to corporate sectors – have an ultimate say regarding critical events.
They have limited jurisdiction to give the appearance of authority, but ultimately they are attached to a leash, just like Max, your neighbor’s German Shepherd.
Once we accept that we never left the cave but were, in fact, just led deeper into its caverns with social algorithms, adult entertainment, processed foods, dumb-down chemicals, and a modern lifestyle that leads you from one distraction to another, the reason why language plays such a central role in the current theatre begins to make sense.
Compared to the medical policies hoisted on us for the past three years, the recent language tweaks may seem like a subtle attack. Still, language is the most fundamental and permanent driver of our belief systems.
Take a dig at some recently canceled words and the official rationale for their cancelation (courtesy of AI).
1. “Master” and “slave,” canceled due to their association with slavery.
2. “Illegal alien or “illegal immigrant,” canceled due to their perceived dehumanizing nature.
3. “Whitelist” and “blacklist” were canceled due to their associations with race.
4. “Crazy,” “insane,” canceled for stigmatizing mental illness.
5. “Retarded,” was canceled due to its use as a derogatory term for people with intellectual disabilities.
6. “Illegal” or “llegals,” canceled due to their perceived dehumanizing nature.
7. “Eskimo,” canceled due to its derogatory connotations and inaccurate use as a catch-all term for Indigenous peoples in the Arctic.
8. “Thug,” canceled due to its association with racial stereotypes and violence.
9. “Illegal” or “alien” canceled due to the dehumanizing nature of the terms.
10. “Mankind” canceled due to its perceived gender exclusivity
11. “Gender reveal party,” canceled due to its reinforcement of the gender binary and potential harm to transgender and non-binary individuals.
12. “All lives matter,” canceled due to its perceived dismissal of the Black Lives Matter movement and the ongoing struggle for racial justice.
13. “Karen,” canceled due to its use as a sexist and ageist slur against women.
14. “Illegal vote,” canceled due to its perpetuation of baseless claims of widespread voter fraud.
15. “Owner” canceled due to its association with slavery.
16. “Exotic,” canceled due to its fetishization and othering of non-white cultures.
17. “Man up” or “be a man,” canceled due to their perpetuation of harmful gender stereotypes.
18. “Illegal dumping,” canceled due to its association with dehumanizing and criminalizing those who engage in the practice.
19. “Ghetto,” canceled due to its association with poverty and black culture.
20. “Lame,” canceled due to its ableist connotations.
21. “Hysterical,” canceled due to its history of being used to dismiss female emotions and experiences.
22. “Retarded,” canceled due to its stigmatization of people with intellectual disabilities.
23. “Urban,” canceled due to its use as a euphemism for “black” or “non-white.”
24. “Illegal contact” or “illegal use of hands,” canceled due to their association with the criminalization of marginalized communities
25. “Preferred pronouns” and “deadname,” canceled due to their association with transphobia and misgendering.
26. “Illegal dumping,” canceled due to its association with racism and the targeting of low-income and minority communities.
27. “Black-on-black crime,” canceled due to its perpetuation of harmful racial stereotypes and misrepresentations of crime statistics.
28. “Cultural appropriation,” canceled due to its association with the exploitation and commodification of marginalized cultures.
29. “Illegal abortion,” was canceled due to its stigmatization and criminalization of women’s healthcare choices.
And so on.
What’s the common theme here? Is it about a genuine movement against discrimination, ableism, and social prejudices? Is there a giant office complex somewhere stacked with benevolent Oompa Loompas who diligently clean our language to make it less offensive for minorities out of their kindheartedness?
Or, is the real-time castration of language a carefully orchestrated endeavor to lay the communication standards for a fully centralized, controlled, globalized, and perfectly homogenized social order?
The targeted words represent clues to the puzzle.
Take the word “white,” which connotes a privileged race responsible for centuries of colonialism, wars, the extermination of indigenous people, and the annoying “I’m at the top of the food chain” attitude that has brought so much misery to other races and species. They deserve some heat, right? So much is clear, except for one thing. The cancellation of “white’ is not about historical justice or fairness but about the fact that due to their caucasian traits, whites would have the most challenging time accepting a shift to a totalitarian, homogeneous society.
The same goes for the word “male” – another unfairly privileged organism. Combine “male” with “white,” and you have a potential extremist terrorist candidate, especially if he is heterosexual, physically fit, and capable of independent thought. At the least, you will have toxic masculinity, which undermines and threatens gender equality and women’s rights.
Ergo, the demotion of “manhood” and “mankind” and all man-this-or-that. Ergo, the all-invasive promotion of transgender rights
, pronoun richness, and non-binary realities, where men can give birth to babies and women can grow penises. Equal justice for all – even if it means hell for genders.
What about the words around “migration” and “illegals”? As a European, I used to believe we owe the refugees a helping hand. Ten years later, I saw what happened to the streets that used to be the safest in the world and developed a suspicion that the migration floods might also be engineered.
Perhaps the War On Terror, the one-sided bombardment of perfectly innocent countries for decades in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, et cetera, had a deeper purpose than just the obvious (oil).
The destabilization of Europe as the second most important haven for Caucasians is a crucial step in the transition of the West to its destiny. What better way than mass migration?
The USA has a similar opening of the floodgates at the Mexican border. Both continents are also looking at engineered food and energy crises and the beginning of hyperinflation. On top of that, the USA is reeling from a series of “mysterious” chemical spills and industrial “accidents” that undermine the meat and poultry industry.
The EU is also reeling from a proxy war with Russia (also engineered) and the shutdown of independent farming due to “climate change”
Take a stab at some of the other canceled words yourself. Can you see how they could grind against a hypothetical future where people must behave like ants with digital IDs to get their next supper?
The attack on Asian populations is less severe, possibly because they are culturally more lenient towards collective societies. Hence, they are already ahead of the game in transitioning to the grey utopia.
the country that our Western leaders and the WEF idolize for their strict Corona measures, offers a preview of the nightmare, featuring total surveillance and a social credit system where expressing the “wrong” words can restrict your freedom of movement or ability to pay for services or products.
Read: China is the forerunner of a digitalized penitentiary – a behavioral experiment for totalitarian control systems in which language is a critical enabler.
We in the West are next.
Why Language Matters
Language is an evolving, living thing that has integrated the human emotional spectrum for conflict and resolution, competition and cooperation, and the clashing and melting of cultures over millennia before taking on the complexity and tonality of modern expression.
Any linguistician will tell you language breathes and feeds on diversity and variance. Historically, tyrannies attempted to control the tongue first and then the people.
The reason is simple—words form realities.
if you cancel a word, the associated reality will vanish next.
The same goes for tonalities. Imagine words on a vector where “weak” stands on the left, “capable” is in the middle, and “strong” is on the right. Fill the in-between spaces with synonyms, then slowly eliminate words from the opposite ends. Subject a group of people to the deletion of words gradually, over decades, like frogs in simmering water, and observe what happens to their attitudes and behavior.
I believe we are the guinea pigs in that experiment.
An experiment so slow and persistent that we fail to notice how we’re increasingly landing in the grey area of our language.
Between “dumb” and “smart.”
Between “ugly” and “beautiful.”
Between “slow” and “fast.”
Between “black” and “white.”
Between “male” and “female.”
Between “good” and “bad.”
Between “boy” and “girl.”
Between “love” and “hate.”
We move towards an in-between world, where language is bereft of diversity and tone, with flattened contrasts and shallow shades, with both beauty and the blemish clipped at the source.
“There are 144 sides to truth,” said Johan Boswinkel, a biophysicist who discovered the “language of light” (in the form of biophotons).
What if you omit the sides – the various perspectives of perceiving reality?
That could be what the modern cancel culture is about – the clipping of truth – for the sake of a “better” future.
A future where no one is left behind, and no one gets ahead, where everyone will feel treated equally with the same rights and social credits. Where individual, national, racial, sexual, gender and other forms of identity have become irrelevant.
According to the history books of this future, we’ve always been a fully inclusive species, docile and cooperative, never warring or rebel-rousing.
That’s the shift we’re undergoing in our central nervous system – involuntarily – as we journey to the grey utopia.
It’s a small price to pay in exchange for future, planetary-wide peace and control, a handful believes.
Even if that sounds way too fantastical, remember that words are beacons. They generate an energy field that influences our environment and ourselves.
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening.
The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available.
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers.
We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control.
One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
A new awareness of the consequences of slave robbery in Spain and Italy – and Britain – about which we currently know much less than about the slave activities of the same period in Africa. The large-scale depopulation of coastal areas from Malaga to Venice, the impoverishment caused by the abduction of many breadwinners, the millions that the already poor inhabitants of villages and cities paid to get their own people back – all this is only now beginning to be understood by contemporary historians.
Can Europeans, and European women in particular, become objects of trade? The idea seems laughable, since the term “slave trade” almost always refers to Africans. Yet not so long ago there was a time when Europe exported white slaves to Africa on a large scale.
These slaves were taken during raids of Crimean Tatar horsemen or North African privateers. A gang of robbers usually moved into an isolated village and took the inhabitants with them – or rather those who were commercially useful, especially young women and boys.
There was a time when Europeans were complicit in this trade and it yielded most of their foreign exchange. This was during the Dark Ages and the early Middle Ages, more specifically the 8th to the 12th centuries.
The Slave Market, painting (ca. 1884) by Jean-Léon Gérôme
5th CENTURY
The slave trade was a godsend for the elites of France, Germany and Italy. With the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century, they had to draw on their gold reserves to buy foreign luxury goods from the Middle East, mostly clothing, upholstery, carpets and other precious fabrics (Skirda, 2010, pp. 56-57).
8th CENTURY
By the 8th century, these reserves were almost completely exhausted. Gold gave way to silver, and even that medium of exchange was discovered. Western Europe had largely returned to an economy of autarky, the shrunken cities were no longer important trading centers. Most people produced everything they needed in their own village or mansion.
Would Western Europe eventually have returned to an international trading economy on its own? Perhaps, although a resurgence of trade would have become more difficult once the elites had become accustomed to autarky. As it turned out, they found the means to buy foreign luxury goods almost at the same time that their gold reserves were running out.
ISLAMIC EXPANSION INTO EUROPE
The 8th century brought the rapid expansion of a new civilization, Islam, to the Middle East, North Africa and Spain. The Arab elite was darker in skin than the Greco-Roman or Visigothic elites she replaced. She was also polygynous. A new market had emerged, a market for wives and concubines. European women were particularly sought after, not because they were exotic, but because their fair skin and fine facial features corresponded to concepts of beauty peculiar to Arab culture. Initially, this trade involved prisoners of war captured during the Islamic expansionary wars. Soon, however, a peaceful trade relationship developed.
It was officially banned by Christian emperors and popes, but in reality they closed their eyes and everything was tolerated in exchange for good golden dinars. Needless to say, this trade would have been impossible without the active cooperation of local elites. They were the main beneficiaries.
JEWS IN ISLAMIC SPAIN
Jews played an extremely important role in the development of medieval European society. In addition to the involvement of the population in the slave trade, the significant advances in agricultural techniques and the resulting agricultural surplus led to the emergence of cities and a larger urban population. This, in turn, paved the way for the opening of international trade routes and the creation of wealth on a scale not seen since the heyday of the Roman Empire. Jewish merchants occupy a critical segment of this international trade, facilitated by the distant networks of friends and family ties inherent in the wide geographical distribution of Jews in the Diaspora. The earliest Jewish trade routes stretched from the Atlantic coasts of France to the Pacific coasts of China. Jewish merchants mainly transported goods that were traded in small quantities and were in high demand, such as spices, perfumes, jewelry and silk.
Under Islam, Jews were allowed to practice their faith and live according to the laws and writings of their community. For most of the 10th and 11th centuries, a period known as the “Golden Age,” the Jewish community flourished in Islamic Spain. Jews reached unprecedented heights in philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, and linguistics. Under Muslim rulers, Jews held prominent government and military positions. But, and it should be noted, Jews were part of European society long before the Muslims conquered Spain. Long before the 10th century, Jews ruled the Khazar Khaganat which was annexed by Russia later in the 9th century. Khazars were Jews. Their correspondence with Spanish Jews in Hebrew is still preserved in archives. All correspondence was, of course, written in Hebrew.
The ancient Bible was written in Hebrew. In the first millennium, the Bible was translated from Hebrew to Latin and into Greek, which influenced the formation and development of the Latin language and later the development of all Slavic languages. Jews were the only people in Europe who were fully literate in medieval history and therefore they were responsible for the chronicles throughout Europe and the Middle East. They translated Bibles into European and Greek languages. Hebrew speakers held all the key positions in the Middle Ages. All Christian monks and other Christian clergy studied Hebrew in seminaries, many of them Jews who had converted to Christianity.
The Jewish financial success was mainly due to the enmity between Christianity and Islam. Since Islamic states in the Middle East and Christian kingdoms in Europe often prohibited each other’s merchants from entering their territory, the Jewish merchants and traders acted as neutral intermediaries and translators, keeping open the lines of communication and trade between the lands of the ancient Roman Empire and the Far East. The question is how did one communicate during the medieval trade?
Hebrew was a lingua franca
Hebrew was an international language in the Middle Ages. Here are two linguistic examples that show the impact of Hebrew during the Middle Ages:
Hebrew root of Russia. The word [Russian/Ros] is the Greek form of the Hebrew word [ראש] and means the head, the leader, the ruler. Kievan Rus practiced Judaism before Christianity was adopted. Russian as the name of the country appeared in chronicles only after Kiev was conquered by Ruriks in the 9th century. When Rurikis conquered Kiev in the 9th century, Novgorod was still practicing paganism. However, Kiev had been Jewish for centuries before Ruriks defeated the Khazarian Kaganat and conquered Kiev, the city practiced Judaism. Kiev was a Jewish city because the Khazars, owners of Kiev, were Jews.
Etymology of the word slave. It comes from the Hebrew word [צלב – tzlav] which means “the cross” and refers to the Christian cross and Christianity. In Arabic, the cross is pronounced [slab], as in Hebrew. From that root came two Latin words: slave and celebration. 1400 years ago, the terms “Christianity”, “Christians” as a definition of people who believed in Jesus were not yet widely distributed in Europe. So when African and Arab pirates captured European people in the coastal areas of Italy or Spain, they identified them by the presence of the cross on the chest [tzlav or slab]. But at the same time, for the word glorification in English, we have the Latin synonym celebration that has the same Semitic root [Heb:- tzlav] or [Arab: – bib] with slave meaning the cross as a symbol of Christianity. Later, that word was rendered in all slavic languages as the Glory – [Rus. – Slava].
Map of Cologne, Hartmann Skull, Liber Chronicarum, Cologne, A. Koberger, 1493.
SLAVE TRADERS JEWS AND VIKINGS
There were 3 groups of European slave traders:
Vikings. The northern route, via the Baltic Sea, was run by Viking traders. Although the Vikings are perhaps best known for amassing wealth through plunder and conquest, they were also skilled and successful merchants. The Vikings developed several trading centers in Scandinavia and beyond during the Viking Age, as well as a series of long-distance trade routes. The economy and slave trade network of the Vikings also effectively helped rebuild the European economy after the fall of the Roman Empire.
Radanites. Jewish medieval merchants were known as “Radanites.” Radanites were the ones who controlled the western overland route from the eastern territories to Muslim Spain via Germany and France. In Western Europe, most medieval Jews resided in Spain. The term “Radanites” is derived from the name of the Muslim-Christian border along the Rhône River (in Latin Rodanus) because of the intensive slave trade that took place there. Another origin of the term “Radanite” was a Persian word for those who “knew the way.” This statement was related to the leading role of Jewish merchants in trade after the fall of the Roman Empire.
Khazars. The various eastern routes, via the Dnieper, the Don and the Volga, were run by Viking or Khazar traders. Khazars were also Jewish. The capital of Khazaria, Itil, was an important Jewish trading center. Jewish merchants played an important role in international trade after the fall of the Roman Empire. For two centuries they made Hebrew the only language of world trade.
All three trading groups cooperated with each other, especially the Radanites and the Khazars (Turks who converted to Judaism).
From the 7th century to the mid-10th century, the Radanites controlled trade that included Western Europe, Africa, and China. It was a period when Hebrew was the only language of world trade. Slavery, the foundation of the Roman economy, was important in the Arab Empire in which the Jews became the most important merchants, trading with the infidels.
SLAVE TRADE IN EASTERN EUROPE
Poland. Commonwealth. Russia
In the 11th century, Jews in Poland, in the service of Boleslav the Great, minted his coins and wrote on them the name of the Polish monarch in Hebrew letters. In addition to such highly regarded artisans, business Jews engaged in profitable slave trade.
The Catholic Church
The Catholic Church fought against slavery and this struggle is documented in the tractate “Infelix Aurum” of the first patron saint of Poland, and since 997 AD the first bishop of Gdansk, Adalbert or Wojciech. In the fight against the slave trade, the family of St. Adalbert lost the Czech throne in Prague to their opponents supported by Jewish slave traders. One of the 18 sculptures on the bronze door from 1170 in front of Gniezno Cathedral depicted the scene of a Polish bishop’s redemption of chained Christian slaves from Jewish traders in the presence of the son of King Boleslaus the Great, the second formally crowned king of Poland, Mieszko II (990-1034).”
As described in the book “Sulejman the Great”, the constant Tatar raids and counterattacks by Cossacks and Polish magnates were always present in Polish-Ottoman relations in the XVI century. Reading the description, it is almost boring: the year the Tatars raided villages, they stocked up on cavalry and recaptured some of the prisoners; the same year, Tatars raided Oczakow, killing Tatars and recapturing slaves. The following year, another Tatar raid hit so-and-so areas… And so it went on for hundreds of years… The Tatar raids on Poland and Russia continued until the 18th when Catherine the Great annexed Crimea and ended slavery.
One of these kidnapped girls was Hürrem Sultan…
Photo: Hürrem Sultan in the popular Turkish TV series.
Hürrem Sultan, the wife of Suleiman the Great was a Russian girl, daughter of an Orthodox priest, kidnapped and sold into slavery from her small town in the Kingdom of Poland. She became the wife of the Ottoman Emperor. Her original name was Alexandra Lisovska. Raised as a Christian Orthodox, she was forced to convert to Islam to join the harem, the royal household in which hundreds of women were kept in the sultan’s service. She was kidnapped by Crimean Tatars. The typical activity of the Crimean Tatars until the 18th century was kidnapping people to sell them to slavery.
200 years later, another remarkable woman came to power, the Russian Empress Catherine the Great, who freed thousands of enslaved Russians from the Tatar yok by annexing the Crimean peninsula. She put an end to that humiliating slave trade for good.
Paintings by Johann Baptist von Lampi der Ältere. Catherine II. Despite her Lutheran origins, after her conversion to Orthodox Christianity, she became the most ardent defender of Russian wherever she stepped up.
SLAVE TRADE IN WESTERN EUROPE
In the 11th century, the most important slave market was in Arab Spain, then the most civilized country in Europe.
France and Italy
The white slaves were castrated in Verdun, Venice and Lyon and sold to Spain by slave traders. This slave trade also included girls and little boys who were well indoctrinated to later be used by Arab rulers as bodyguards, slave soldiers, and bureaucrats.
Only the adolescent boys and girls were spared, enslaved and immediately sold to the merchants who accompanied the armies. The Barbarian could get gold by trading slaves. These objects of slavish trade and commerce were incorporated into harems and used as military slaves or eunuchs. Adults and children were eliminated for obvious reasons. They did not meet the Muslim demand for young virgin girls and beardless boys and it was out of the question to collect and raise children. The traders had neither the time nor the willingness and more importantly, it would not have been profitable. Later, they would spare the lives of more prisoners, selecting them based on their productive labor abilities and using them to the limit for heavy physical tasks (Skirda, 2010, pp. 85-86).
The prisoners were transported by land via various routes: via Germany and France to Muslim Spain; via Venice and by ship to the Middle East; or across the Dnieper, the Don or the Volga to the Middle East via the Black Sea or the Caspian Sea. How many were traded? That’s hard to say, but Skirda (2010, p. 6) comes up with figures between tens of thousands and several hundred thousand for the period from the 8th to the 12th century.
It was more than any other trade that revived the old trade networks, not only between Europe and the Middle East, but also within Europe itself. The foreign exchange balance also shifted in Europe’s favor, giving the elites of France, Germany, and Italy the means to buy not only foreign goods, but also local products. As Skirda ironically notes:
“The Italians who were the ‘great initiators of Europe’ became the promoters of trading enterprises, creators of credit, repairers of currency. It is easier to understand why almost all historians and commentators have observed this phenomenon in silence. It is difficult for them to recognize that the economic renaissance of the West of the 10th and 11th centuries was brought about by human trafficking! “ (Skirda, 2010, p. 112)
Islamic Spain was the main market for slaves (eunuchs, girls and young boys). Slavery, the foundation of the Roman economy, was important in the Arab Empire. Some slaves were sold as far away as China, which also bought fur, beaver skins, silk and weapons. China exported cinnamon, spices, musk and camphor to Europe.
Western Europe exported more than a million slaves between 1530 and 1780 (Davis, 2004). Between 1500 and 1650, Eastern Europe exported 1.5 million slaves to Africa, the Middle East, and Asia (Fisher, 1972; Kolodziejczyk, 2006).
England
Slavery already existed in England in the 11th century – the Domesday book mentions how many slaves there were in each village. The Normans and Vikings had their ‘thralls’. In the 11th century, Bristol shipped English slaves to the Viking city of Dublin – the then Bishop of Worcester, Saint Wulfstan, preached against trade.
Scandinavia
Viking enslaved people were called “thralls” in Old Norwegian . As many as 10% of Scandinavia’s population were slaves, according to the Norwegian researchers. Most of the thralls were local Scandinavian people. They may have been kidnapped or captured during Viking raids and forced into slavery. Or they may also have simply fallen into debt and had to fulfill their obligations by entering into lifelong slavery. The throne was inherited by the bloodline of the mother: if the mother was a slave, the child was a slave, even though the father was a free man; If the mother was a free woman, the child was a free man, even though the father was a slave. Scandinavia abolished serfdom in the 14th century.
Some slaves were imported to Scandinavia from the Islamic world. In Viking raids, slaves and prisoners were usually of great importance, both for monetary and labor value. In addition to buying and selling, “thralls” could also be used to pay off debts, and were often used as human sacrifices in religious ceremonies. The price of a slave depended on his abilities, age, health, and appearance. Many pagan and Christian slaves were sold by the Vikings to the Caliphate because of the high demand.
The Vikings called themselves Russian and they were the founders of Kievan Rus’. The Arab traveler ibn Fadlan described these Vikings as follows:
I have seen the Russian when they came on their trade trips and set up camp at the Itil. I’ve never seen more perfect specimens, the size of date palms, blonde and ruddy; They wear neither tunics nor caftans, but the men wear a robe that covers one side of the body and releases a hand. Each man has an axe, a sword and a knife, and always keeps them with him. The swords are wide and grooved, of Frankish kind.
Ireland
In Northwest Europe in the Viking Age, Dublin was the center of the slave trade,
Iceland
Guðríður Símonardóttir was an Icelandic woman who was one of 242 people kidnapped in the Westman Islands in Iceland during a robbery by Barbary pirates. These raids became known as the Turkish kidnappings and Guðríður became known as Tyrkja-Gudda. After being kept as a slave and concubine for almost ten years, she was one of the few prisoners ransomed by the Danish king. She returned to Iceland and married the young reverend Hallgrímur Pétursson. The story of “Gudda The Turk”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gu%C3%B0r%
Estimated exchange rates at the beginning of the 11th century in Iceland were:
8 ounces of silver = 1 ounce of gold;
8 ounces of silver = 4 dairy cows;
8 ounces of silver = 24 sheep;
12 ounces of silver = 1 adult male slave.
The Barbary Corsairs raided Northern Europe for slaves on many occasions.
Painting Giulio Rosati, Inspection of New Arrivals, 1858-1917, Circassian Beauties. In French, “la traite des Blanches”. The English translation, “white slave trade”, the term is often used today as a synonym for international prostitution.
Photo: Group of white slaves in Germany. 1942. Slavery may never go away. Nazi Germany reinstalled white slavery from the Bay of Biscay to the Bering Sea in 1941.
DEMOCRACY and EUROPEAN UNION
Surprisingly, but in addition to the barbaric traditions of slavery and human sacrifice, medieval Europe had democracy, elections and a society without borders from London to Moscow, something we can only dream of. The European Union was also established. You can see that the Dark Ages were not so dark and for some countries it was Golden Middle Ages.
Open borders society. All Europeans were mobile and moved from one place to another without a visa. 1000 years ago, there were no borders between countries in Europe. Visas, border guards, passports did not exist in Europe and the concept of ethnicity or nationality did not exist. Europeans were divided only by religion, language and loyalty to the king, not by ethnic groups. People moved freely in Europe, from Dublin to Moscow. In the Middle Ages, Europeans had much more freedom of movement than modern Europeans. The Varangians (proto-Russians) are a good example of the mobility and travel of peoples from one end of the continent to the other, which means that Celts, Germans, Goths, English, Latinos, Huns and God knows who else roamed throughout Europe and moved freely and without visas throughout the territory, giving the idea that a certain area in Europe belonged to a certain ethnic group, becomes meaningless.
Democracy. Russia had a democracy during the Middle Ages. Veche was a Russian democratic parliamentary form of state government (legislature) in the Novgorod Republic from 862 to 1478. Rus has known democratic forms of government, also from the period before Kievan Rus. The Novgorod Parliament had legislative power, the Parliament could dismiss unwanted monarchs and appoint new ones, the Parliament managed the finances, declared war and made peace, claimed treaties with foreigners, led the court on political and official crimes, etc. In 862, Novgorod veche signed a contract with Rurik.
Elections. France had democratic elections in the 11th century. The election by a voting body facilitated the peaceful transfer of power, even though such decisions also took into account the privileges of birth and rank, as well as the demands of the church. Under canon law, medievalists were guaranteed certain human rights, including welfare rights, voting rights for certain classes, and religious freedom.
Hanse
The European Union existed in the Middle Ages for 400 years in the form of the Hanseatic League, and was controlled by the German city of Hansa. The Hanseatic League was a forerunner of the modern European Union. The idea of the EU is very old and was always managed by Germany. The Hanseatic League was a commercial and defensive confederation of merchant guilds and market towns in Northern Europe. It was a powerful economic and defensive alliance that left behind a great cultural and architectural heritage. The cities that participated in the alliance assembled their own armies, with each guild having to provide levies as needed. The Hanseatic cities came to each other’s aid and merchant ships often had to be used to transport soldiers and their weapons. The alliance, which emerged from some northern German cities in the late 1100s, included 170 cities and controlled maritime trade across the Baltic Sea along the coasts of northern Europe, from London to Moscow, for three centuries. Novgorod in particular was an important Russian trading partner of the Hansa in the Middle Ages.
Exploratory trade adventures, raids, tourism, and piracy occurred early throughout the Baltic Sea region; the sailors of Gotland ascended the rivers to Novgorod. Lübeck became a base for merchants from Saxony and Westphalia who traded eastwards and northwards. This area was a source of wood, wax, amber, resin and fur, along with rye and wheat brought to the port markets on barges from the hinterland.
Main trade routes of the Hanseatic League
Alliance between Visby and Novgorod
Long before the Hanseatic League was founded, the Scandinavian city of Visby functioned as the most important trading center in the Baltic Sea since the 10th century. In 1080 AD, merchants of Visby established a Scandinavian trading post Gutagard-Gotenhof in the Russian city of Novgorod. International trade in the Baltic Sea region before the Hanseatic League was led by the Scandinavians, who established important trading centers in Birka, Haithabu and Schleswig in the 9th century.
Later, merchants from the Holy Roman Empire also stayed in Novgorod. In 1220, the Germans established their own trading post “Kontor” Peterhof, not far from Novgorod. In 1229, German merchants were granted certain privileges that made their position in Russia safer.
Painting: Georg Giese from Danzig, 34-year-old German Hanseatic merchant at the Steelyard, painted in London by Hans Holbein.
THE FATE OF THE BARBARY STATES AND PIRACY
Barbary states, term used for the North African states of Tripolitania, Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco. From the 16th century, Tripolitania, Tunisia and Algeria were autonomous provinces of the Turkish Empire. Morocco continued its own independent development. The pirate Barbarossa and his brothers led the Turkish conquest to prevent the region from falling into the hands of Spain. A final attempt by the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V to expel the Turks failed in 1541. The piracy that the Muslims of North Africa subsequently practiced began as part of the wars against Spain. In the 17th and 18th centuries, when the Turkish grip on the area became weaker, the raids took on a less military and more commercial character. The loot, ransom and slaves that resulted from the attacks on Mediterranean cities and ships and from occasional trips to the Atlantic became the main source of income for the local Muslim rulers.
All the major European naval forces attempted to destroy the pirates, and the British and French fleets repeatedly bombed the pirate strongholds. But in general, the countries that traded in the Mediterranean found it more convenient to pay estimates than to take on the expensive task of eradicating piracy. By the end of the 18th century, the power of the pirate states diminished. The United States and the European powers took advantage of this decrease to carry out more attacks. American opposition resulted in the Tripolitan War. After the Napoleonic Wars, European opinion was clearly in favour of the destruction of pirates. In 1816, Lord Exmouth put an end to the naval power of the dey of Algiers with an Anglo-Dutch fleet. An ultimatum from the European Congress of Aix-la-Chapelle (1819) forced the bey of Tunis to give up piracy.
The fate of European slaves in Africa
Many slaves converted to Islam. That means they were only “freed from the oar, but not from the service of their patron.” Christian girls who were included in the pasha’s harem often became “Turks” to stay with their children, who were raised as Muslims.
Christian men sought easier work after converting to Islam, usually as overseers of other slaves, and some gained real power and sometimes their freedom. Between 1580 and 1680, there were typically about 15,000 of these “apostates” in Barbary, including about half of the captains, or re’is, and even some of the pashas. Most had probably never been slaves, but had come to Africa in search of opportunities, and along with their former lives had cast off Christianity.
The Legacy of Slavery
Slaves in the Barbary states could be black, brown or white, Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Jewish or Muslim. In the 1600s, one’s race or religion was not automatically destined for slavery. Pastors in churches from Sicily to Boston spoke of the similar fate of black slaves on American plantations and white slaves in privateer galleys; early abolitionists used slavery in Barbary as a way to address the universal degradation of slavery in all its forms.
This may require us to rethink our belief that race was fundamental to premodern ideas about slavery. It also requires a new awareness of the consequences of slave robbery in Spain and Italy – and Britain – about which we currently know much less than about the slave activities of the same period in Africa. The large-scale depopulation of coastal areas from Malaga to Venice, the impoverishment caused by the abduction of many breadwinners, the millions that the already poor inhabitants of villages and cities paid to get their own people back – all this is only now beginning to be understood by contemporary historians.
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
‘It has taken billions of years for each one of us to reach here. To reach this splendour.’
So Peter Owen Jones reminds us in the prologue to his Conversations with Nature (Clairview Books, October 2022), a series of eighteen metaphysical meditations, or prose poems, visceral personifications of the natural world.
The quote remains uppermost in the mind in one’s appreciation of this lyrical work, a powerful evocation of the evolutionary impulse and its interconnectedness, and how meaning and significance is readily revealed by communing with nature. It’s a small book, only about 80 pages with illustrations, but it has a big message.
An Anglican priest in East Sussex, England, Owen Jones is the author of several previous books and, in the past two decades, has been the presenter of a number of BBC TV programmes with spiritual and ecological themes.
He says: ‘We don’t save the natural world, it saves us. By seeking to save the natural world in all its glory, brutality and fertility, we can start to save ourselves. If we act with love towards the natural world, we can start to become the best of ourselves. Altruism, love and care trumps survivalism as well as delusions of mastery and command.’
Owen Jones’s radical vision is of a personal immersion in, or re-merging with, nature, a reconstitution of human participation in the universal where the materialist paradigm is subverted. He joins the ranks of nature mystics in a metaphysical tradition, with an intensity of vision akin to, say, Edward Thomas, Richard Jefferies or Henry Vaughan, taking literary examples from past centuries.
Nature speaks to us if we have ears to hear, Owen Jones assures us; if we don’t heed what it’s saying then we cut ourselves off from our true being: the fox, the mouse, the bear, the heron, the hawthorn, the jasmine flower, they all tell us so. It’s a call back to creation.
Code of life
From ‘The oak speaks of sanctuary’: ‘The giving of sanctuary is written into the code of life. Planet Earth is a sanctuary, a lifeworld in the midst of space.’
And from ‘The pond speaks of peace’: ‘I cannot know peace unless I am living in peace with every tree, with every bird, with every cloud, with the deer, with the snake and the nettle, with the very air itself.’
A Wordsworthian sentiment is detectable. In ‘The Painted Lady speaks of reverie’, Owen Jones writes: ‘While you fill your days with counting and carrying, the magpies are merrying, otters are spinning stones, the pomegranate is flowering, ripples are weaving lagoons and the mountain streams are gambolling down.’
Indeed, so, while we’re ‘getting and spending’, Conversations with Nature provides us with a poetical aide-mémoire that helps us remember our cosmic origins, on what we depend and what we’re part of; in forgetfulness we cannot truly know ourselves.
I use the word ‘mystic’ in the context of Owen Jones’s book more in terms of its deeper meaning involving self-surrender to attain unity with the absolute, rather than the general sense of someone who connects to the divine through nature, and draws inspiration from it, although this aspect is also present.
A long tradition of mystical thought in the West resonates with that strand of Christianity which deplores the secular or physical world — the world that’s ‘too much with us’ — and seeks to divert attention to other realms. In saying this, I’d contend that the mystical experience is not a glimpse into another, higher order of reality, but actually is that reality.
Spiritual teacher
Nature comes to be seen as a spiritual teacher, a notion found in cultures worldwide and expressed in most spiritual traditions — Gaia theory and post-materialist science having complemented the idea in recent decades.
Conversations with Nature,offering the promise of such teaching, regards nature as life’s ‘temple’, towards which we should act with loving kindness as a kind of spiritual exercise. The book includes a glossary conscientiously explaining various allusions, and benefits from ideographic drawings by Jerry Shearing.
Owen-Jones, now 65, has a variform background. Having grown up in the countryside, he dropped out of school at 16 and went to Australia where he worked as a farm hand. Returning to the UK, he continued farm work before running a mobile disco and then taking a job in advertising as a messenger boy, working his way up to become a creative director. In his late 20s, married and with two children, he gave up the commercial life to follow a calling to the Anglican ministry, being ordained in 1992.
On TV, in How to Live a Simple Life (2010), he tried to live a life without money in the footsteps of St Francis of Assisi, and in Around the World in 80 Faiths (2009) he visited adherents of various religions. His 2006 documentary The Lost Gospels discussed the Apocryphal Gospels omitted from the New Testament, and how their contents might have changed Christian theology if they had not been suppressed.
His previous books include Small Boat, Big Sea: One Year’s Journey as a Parish Priest (2000), Letters from an Extreme Pilgrim: Reflections on life, love and the soul (2010), and Pathlands: 21 Tranquil Walks Among the Villages of Britain (2015).
If they think overpopulation is a problem, why INSIST that everyone get vaccinated to save lives? Why not just let us die naturally? They are contradicting themselves.
It differs from because under these circumstances the memory is stored in our genes/dna and far reach consequences for you but also will as a result effect in your off-spring. It is deliberately used and cultivated By what you can call dark or evil forces’ and mostly the combination of fear/guilt. Humans become controllable.
TRAUMA as an infant/child SHATTERS the inner peace of theta brainwaves making it 100 times more intense, than it would be on an adult. Trauma prevents the fetus/child/adult from integrating the linear information of the cause and effect of their abuses that happen in 3D. Linear Information gets disjointed, because during trauma the infinite gray soul essence when it doesn’t leave by dissociating, focuses on small irrelevant details to distract them from being aware of abusive episodes. AND there are flashbacks of when the soul currently being abused was the one creating trauma and sharing their hateful thought patterns.
The child’s consciousness reads the dark thoughts and intent of their predator very proficiently. Frequently the thoughts are more upsetting than the predator’s actions. Their vehemence, hate and anger are acutely sensed. The small human biology has few options available to it. Child and predator are in the same energy field or resonance. Both slice up their memory into a few or a great many pieces and isolate the pieces so they can continue NOT feeling or KNOWING or acting compassionately.
IMPRISONED by your Biology Post author:Bonnie Baumgartner Post published:November 24, 2022
Pictures are added. The biology becomes the baby/child’s prison when the caretaker’s are Dark Ones incapable of self compassion. Imagine being the infinite dark gray soul essence stuck in or around its biology being tortured in one or more ways one can torment a baby. The baby’s soul recognizes its caretaker as a baby it had tormented in previous incarnations. Quantum law of attraction and entrainment matches like resonances.
What is the point! What is the win for either side?
THETA brainwavesare perfectly normal in children up to 13 years old, allowing them to objectively observe themself and those around them to make clear insightful observations about the truth. When you feel protected and SAFE theta brainwaves are normal for all ages and accessible during sleep. You can be an objective observer able to see the larger picture.
TRAUMA as an infant/child SHATTERS the inner peace of theta brainwaves making it 100 times more intense, than it would be on an adult. Trauma prevents the fetus/child/adult from integrating the linear information of the cause and effect of their abuses that happen in 3D. Linear Information gets disjointed, because during trauma the infinite gray soul essence when it doesn’t leave by dissociating, focuses on small irrelevant details to distract them from being aware of abusive episodes. AND there are flashbacks of when the soul currently being abused was the one creating trauma and sharing their hateful thought patterns.
The child’s consciousness reads the dark thoughts and intent of their predator very proficiently. Frequently the thoughts are more upsetting than the predator’s actions. Their vehemence, hate and anger are acutely sensed. The small human biology has few options available to it. Child and predator are in the same energy field or resonance. Both slice up their memory into a few or a great many pieces and isolate the pieces so they can continue NOT feeling or KNOWING or acting compassionately.
For those still choosing to embrace denial and dwell only in the victim part of their cycle entitled to vengeance, ALTERS or ALTERNATE PERSONALITIES are created. Moving back and forth into different states of consciousness, keeps one busy, distracted and not responsible for the self or owning what is true. Linear Information is disjointed or segmented to prevent awareness of causes and affects therefore avoiding culpability, shame, guilt or any need to change things. If one puts information in a cause and effect formate they would be awake aware and sense how it feels to be them. Your higher self would love to give you a slideshow of your history, just ask.
Medical community calls the above Dissociative identity disorder DID previously known as Multiple Personality Disorder MPD and Borderline Personality BPD when the alters are not clear cut, there is a pattern of unstable intense relationships, distorted self-image, extreme emotions and impulsiveness.and their is Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD.
The Illuminists have made a detailed science of how to make human consciousness split off when triggered to act like artificial intelligence, to perform without thought or choice. These alters, are so well TRAINED, fearful, confused and dissociated as they accomplish tasks obediently and efficiently having potentially two thousand possible alternate personalities or alters or splits in one system. The conscious choice to join the illuminati is for the perks they “baited you with,” and switched on you once you join the family.
FREE FLOATING ANXIETY or Generalized Anxiety Disorder, GAD is characterized by persistent worry or anxious feelings, that something bad is about to happen. It floats in and out, coming and going with NO real observable threat in present time. This is the person trying to suppress or deny a flashback of their memory of a mean spirited cycle they put into motion. A memory of trauma, terror or abuse they delivered to another, trying to break through into their conscious awareness.
Why has a connection failed to be made about males abusing female children in all the ways possible. And then expect that adult female to be a nurturing and compassionate baby maker and caretaker? Why wouldn’t you assume any abused and used child will NOT be a healthy example of compassion and know how to nurture a child? In fact all the evidence says abuse and indifference begets more of the same.
BUT the only way to take back YOUR power and control OVER the “bad stuff” in your life is to be conscious about and own the entire cycle. Confusion and chaos is a way to avoid or delay the truth. During trauma, terror or abuse, the brain in the biology gets short circuited by your emotional reaction and beliefs. The brain can’t process in a linear way the sequence or severity. The cause and effect is broken up into isolated pieces as a coping mechanism. The default reaction when one small UNCONNECTED piece, comes into your awareness you react with fear and confusion.
“Pretty stories” and lies you own make your aura appear like a dark storm cloud, and your senses are fear and anxiety. There is restlessness and endless searching with one aspect of you. Another part of you has built an energy WALL of fear and trusting NO ONE, to have access to you again. Others are unable to penetrate your wall of protection.
In other words, what people think are ‘aliens’ from another planet are beings from the the 8th sphere the fallen realm of the earth. There is nothing about them that is actually from another planet. This is pure deception. They don’t/didn’t use material technology to get here. The last difference is that higher beings from other worlds do not arrive in nuts and bolts ships. They do not use technology. They do not need it. They rely on inner spiritual power to communicate and traverse the material plane. They have transcended physicality and are not bound by it!
Quite simply, at this point in time, physical technology is only used by us earthly humans! And there is a great effort by certain darker forces to create a different idea about how the cosmos works and the beings within it.
The main tenet for dark forces is to convince humanity that technology is the pinnacle of human development. In this way, technology replaces inner (spiritual) development. To achieve this humanity must believe that advanced beings themselves use technology.
At this point people become confused about abductions and physical experiences with beings that claim to be alien. To understand this we must understand the creation of golems.
The beings that appear as ‘aliens’, in the most physical cases, are more often than not golems. They’re created forms to house dark entities. Of course there are rare exceptions of entities from the abyss directly manifesting, but that takes incredible energy. It is much easier to simply create a goelm for demonic entities to enter.
Astral encounters, which accounts for the vast majority of ‘contact’, are better classified as spiritual experiences with higher (angelic hierarchies) or lower beings (8th sphere). They’re not ‘aliens’ and those experiences do not qualify as a separate category. They have been part of the human experience since our beginnings.
Advanced technologies exist but are really a vestige of Atlantis, a different period of human development entirely. Our work now is to internalize our development, and, every thing that advanced technology claims to do, we can do through spiritual development. Technology was simply training wheels. Spiritual masters (and higher spiritual beings) do not show up in a ship, humans do. Physical earth based people and their golems do.
Understanding these key truths will help us navigate waves of false disclosure that will come in the future. More Esoteric Secrets of Disclosure:
The purpose of the author’s work is to bring to our attention the significance of linguistic codes in the pre-Sumerian language – codes found in all languages – which he reveals to us after his extensive research. But the style in which Anton Parks reveals his story of saurians or reptiles has rarely been seen or read: an essay that reads like a novel while teaching us of a system of interdimensional life that resembles ours, with personages who experience the same emotions as we do.- Nenki, Editor www.conspiration.cc
Anton Parks’ Le Secret des Etoiles Sombres might be a novel, constructed to illustrate via a gripping narrative the author’s insights into a human prehistoric background – rather a prehuman historic background – gained through his deep linguistic analysis of ancient Mesopotamian languages: Sumerian, Akkadian, Babylonian.
However, Parks himself does not believe his book to be a work of fiction. Rather, it is a transcription of experiences he had – through an imposed virtual reality projection, or a parapsychological mind meld, or some other process for which we cannot even propose a name – that intruded upon and overwhelmed his daily life for many years.
Before reading his book, one needs to know what it is. The best way to begin to understand is through Parks’ own description of how he acquired his information. For this we turn to a penetrating interview of Parks conducted by Alain Gossens of Karmapolis.be.
The wide-ranging interview also serves as a précis of the book as a whole, and as such was an aid in organizing and beginning to write this web page. Increasingly, the page has been incorporating information from private communications with Anton Parks, and from the book itself.
One other important first detail for English-speaking readers: no English-language translation of the book or the interview has been undertaken. We will not attempt a close translation on this page either, but the importance of Parks’ work seems so great that we are moved to provide English-speaking readers with a summary and discussion of the basic facts contained in them.
Parks’ experiences began at the age of 14, in 1981, with a series of “flashes” that would occur at any hour of the day, and completely beyond his control. These eventually evolved into “visions” that took place from once to three times each day.
The visions seemed somehow to be related to or triggered by the ambient light at the time of their occurrence. The light in the visions had the same “spectrum” as the surrounding light. They came as “jets of light” from above, penetrating the top of his head, at the level of the “seventh principal chakra.” They would instantly disconnect him from his surroundings and move him into complete scenes, including the aspect of sound.
He would find himself “inside” a certain being, and usually would find the same set of “personages” around him.
These living experiences would take from two to up to ten minutes. Yet if there were people around Parks at the time the visions occurred, they did not seem to notice that anything special had happened, which leads Parks to believe that he would have been gone for only a few seconds at most, in their time.
Parks struggled to comprehend the source of these visions, and their meaning. It was not until the end of the 90s and much research that he came to understand that they were related to the Sumerian civilization and to a language from which the Sumerian language emerged.
Parks also began to consider aspects of reincarnation theory in trying to comprehend what was happening to him.
The personage whose identity Parks assumed in his visions bore the name of “Sa’am,” and it was Sa’am’s “destiny” that Parks was retracing.
Sa’am belonged to a group of “reptilian” races known as the Gina’Abul, and these are the divinities who are written about on the Mesopotamian tablets.
Sa’am had a certain crystal that was called “Gírkù.” The information that Parks was receiving was in some way coming from the crystal, which led him to wonder if the experience was being played out in his mind by the crystal or if he really was this “Sa-am” who owned it.
After many years of living with these visions, Parks found that they were taking too much of his life, and he began a process of reducing and blocking them. This took many months, but the phenomenon eventually disappeared, in 1991 around the time of the first Persian Gulf War.
Coming to terms with the experience, Parks decided that it was not necessary to know for certain if he truly was the Sa’am personage, although in the depths of his being he is convinced that it is so. Perhaps this was what led him to begin a study of ancient Mesopotamian texts. He and his associates were soon shocked to find that the history they related was practically identical to what he had received – or lived through – in his visions.
Pursuing an interest in the Sumerian language, and aided by his “flashes,” Parks discovered the “linguistic code of the ‘gods'”.
Eventually what became most important was the need to write and publish the information he was gathering. He began this task in the period 2000-2001.
His work, when complete, will consist of three volumes, strict transcriptions of what he received over a period of ten long years.
Parks has examined the translations of Samuel Kramer, Jean Bottéro, Marie-Joseph Seux, Thorkild Jacobsen, René Labat, and André Caquot. While they differ from one another, their core information is the same, and Parks and his associates couldn’t help noticing a surprising similarity between his flashes and the basic story written down on the ancient clay tablets – certainly more than 5000 to 6000 years old!
It was all Parks could do to keep from plunging too deeply into these translations, so as to continue to preserve intact the history as he had received it, which contained numerous elements that were totally absent from the tablets.
He found striking similarities on concepts having to do with cloning, well detailed on the tablets, which have also been discussed by modern authors Zecharia Sitchin, R. Boulay, and David Icke.
Most important was information relating to the central personage known in Parks’ first volume as Sa-am, who took other names while on the Earth. But he cannot speak further of this for the time being, as it would reveal in advance certain important details from the second volume which has not been edited at the time of this interview.
The language in which Parks received his information was completely unlike French, yet he knew it as though it were his native tongue.
For some years he had believed the language to be Hebrew, but was disabused of this idea through the use of a Hebrew syllabary (a set of signs or symbols representing the sounds that make up the words. Since these constituent sounds have their own meanings, one can use this tool to decompose and understand the complex meanings of complete words).
It is this focus on the phonetic values of the syllables that distinguishes Parks’ linguistic methodology. These exhibit a common base among numerous ancient languages.
Parks learned that the codification of the language was associated with the existence of castes in the society he had experienced in his visions: that of the Gina’abul (Sumerian word for lizards). By the end of the 1990s Parks knew he was on the trail of Sumer; the Sumerian syllabary helped him to decompose certain biblical terms.
Decomposing a word required knowledge of the context that had led to the original assembling of its terms. For example, he explains, the Sumerian Gina’abul can be decomposed as GINA-AB-UL (“veritable ancestor(s) of the splendor”). When one understands the excessive vanity of the beings Parks experienced, one is not surprised by this appellation.
Take the name Adam, which we are supposed to believe comes from the Hebrew in relation to the terms adama (clod of earth?) or adôm (red). Parks is unaware that any author has considered the Sumerian Á-DAM, which means “beasts, animals, flocks” or “levy (?), establishment, installation or colonization,” all subsumed under “inflict!”
If Á-DAM were to designate persons, they would be “beasts, animals, levied, established, installed,” or even “colonized, inflicted.”
The idea of an enslaved being, totally submissive to “gods,” is reinforced in the equivalent of the term Á-DAM in Akkadian, which is Nammaššû, translated phonetically in Sumerian as nam-maš-šû, “the demi-portion to charge.”
What could be more precise?
Parks applies this method to determine and verify in detail virtually every translatable term in connection with the history he relates. In Le Secret, the number of words that he did not decompose with the aid of the Sumero-Akkadian syllabary could be counted on the fingers of one hand. He believes he is the first to use this decomposition method.
The syllables of Sumerian and Akkadian words allow Parks to decompose the principal words of other ancestral languages: Chinese, Hebrew, ancient Greek, Latin, Germanic and Amerindian languages, etc. That leads to a unified understanding of all languages, but discussion of this will have to await the later volumes in the series.
Parks does provide in the current volume the accents and numeric labeling of syllables that are part of his system. He also makes the key point that the Sumerian syllabary – Sumerian being the Emenita, the male language of the Gina’abul – was uniquely used by the Gina’abul males, while the females, who created the ensemble of the Gina’abul syllabary, adroitly juggled with the particles in the Sumerian and those taken from the Akkadian language. Together this formed a sort of integral version of the language called Emeša (the matrix language).
The females (priestesses) developed Emeša as part of their response to their capture and oppression by the male Gina’abul, the famous Ušumgal and Mušgir (see Races), who had discovered the secret of their feminine sexual power. A group of the males wished to imprison the females and make them submit to abominations so as to seize that power for themselves. The females, confined by the males, developed Hermetic rites and other secrets in order to protect themselves. So that they would be able to communicate among themselves with full confidence, they created the supplementary linguistic particles that form the Emešà language that no male is supposed to speak.
None of this is inscribed on the tablets. The pictograms and the cuneiform did evolve. Meanwhile, the Gina’abul held their code closely.
As to how the Akkadian language (and its syllabary) appeared totally formed from one day to the next, apparently subsequently to the Sumerian, this will be explained in Volume 3: “Rising Nibiru” (The Evil of Nibiru).
In his interview, Parks provides a glimpse of the numerous races at play in his works: those that make up the Kadištu collective and the Gina’abul races, a large part of whom are in conflict with the Kadištu. The female Gina’abul, however, are the Amašutum priestesses, who belong to the Kadištu. This is an example of the complex relationships and interactions that make up Parks’ story.
Kadištu
Akkadian: Qadistu, evoking high-ranking priestesses. Sumerian: NU-GIG, meaning “non-evil” but also “the image of evil” – sacred prostitutes. Related to the Latin caduceus. Emissaries of “the Original Source,” they live in “higher dimensions” called “Angal.” Role is to unify the species of the universe. Very powerful but do not interfere in the affairs of beings evolving in the “reduced frequencies.”
Abgal
Kadištu subgroup. Genetically affiliated with Gina’abul, but with genes of a far-off amphibian race. Sages of the Gagsisá (Sirius) system.
Amašutum
Female Gina’abul*. “Mother Lizards.” Priestesses. Kadištu subgroup, therefore also associated with the principle of “good and evil.” Life Designers. Ursa Major, Hyades, Pleiades, Orion.
Ama’argi
Female Gina’abul terrestrials.
Sukkal
Kadištu subgroup having the form of birds. “Cousin of the Gina’abul.” Important Life Designers. Urbar’ra (Lyra).
Urmah
Warriors / Life Designers. Logo: the lion. Felidae or feline. Feline-humanoid appearance; actually resembles a lion. Always seen with claws; unknown if natural or artificial. Orion. The official army of the Kadištu, who often referred to them concerning problems of rule. For that reason, the Urmah were found at several times in our solar system.
Prodigious androgyne race assembled by the Kadištu on Uraš (Earth). Highly respected because it combined the genetic patrimony of numerous Life Designer species.
Kingú
Akkadian Quingu. Sumerian: KIN-GU = “ruler over the Earth (or regions). Logo: the eagle. Princely root stock of the Gina’abul. At war with the Ušumgal. Three types: whites [Kingú-Babbar, grand royals; Te (Aquila)], reds [warriors-cleaners; Ušu (Draco)], greens [the people, also warriors]. Most Kingú possess a mark on the forehead, like a third eye.
Kingú-Babbar
Royal albino Kingú, originally from Ušu (Draco), where they created the Ušumgal. Relocated to Urbar’ra (Lyra) with the Ušumgal, whom they abandoned there at the time of the Great War. Resettled in the constellation Te (Aquila). Some are present in our solar system, originally from Te, and are central to events that will be described in Parks’ second book, Adam Genisis. They are in conflict with the Anunnaki and their descendants. Solitary, do not like to mix with others, because they feel superior to the rest of the Gina’abul. These are the largest of all the Kingú. Some possess wings and horns; others absolutely none. Those in our solar system have hardly any wings and no horns. Among all the Gina’abul, most closely resemble humans.
Red Kingú
Just beneath the Kingú-Babbar in the social order. Specialists in war; soldiers. Reddish skin. Have tail, horn, and wings.
Kingú People
Workers and warriors. These are the Kingú who take part in the battles on Dukù at the end of Book 1. Greenish skin (a little lighter than that of the Anunna).
Imdugud (Anzu)
Mix of Kingú-Babbar and Urmah. Depicted emblematically in Sumerian and Akkadian imagery as half eagle, half lion, respectively representing their genetic roots. White skin (like the Kingú-Babbar). Appear “Nordic” but with a slight “animal” look in their eyes, an aspect that is connected with their genes. They resemble humans, often with blue eyes, and are very tall. Emit barking or whistling sounds. Always seen with claws; unknown if natural or artificial. Solitary. Originated in Tiamate (our Solar System) well before 300,000 y.a., which is when the Anunna arrived.
Ušumgal
“Grand Dragons,” later Sumerian term for their gods and sovereigns; descended from Kingú-Babbar; creators of the Annuna and other races. The Ušumgal Council of Nalulkára were survivors of the Great War.
Šutum
Male Gina’abul*. “Lizard” in Sumerian. Created by Abzu-Abba to impregnate the Amašutum, but their reproductive abilities were in decline. They suffered from a disease of unknown cause. Originally, laborers, working for the entire race of Gina’abul. Margid’da (Ursa Major).
Nungal
Great Lords. Bible: watchers. Akkadian: Igigi. Male. Created (in great haste) by Sa’am and Mamitu-Nammu (see Personages) from Imdugud genes on which Abzu-Abba had been experimenting. Considered as Life Designers although no knowledge of cloning.
Anunna
Warriors. Created by An and Ninmah on Dukù, Mulmul (Pleiades), from a genetic patrimony discovered by Ninmah on Nalulkára. No doubt the cell line was enhanced Šutum. Wars among the Gina’abul brought them to the Earth. Anunnaki = “Anunna of the Earth.” Have manipulated humans for millennia.
Mušgir
“Furious reptile” – winged dragons. Assyrian: “Pazuzu”. Can easily move between the “first and third dimensions.” Originally created in Lyra by Ušumgal; An and Ninmah produced a second line on Dukù, Mulmul (Pleiades), using a cell line discovered by Ninmah on Nalulkára. Have tail, horns, and wings.
Mìmínu
Dogon: ant. Known to us as “grey” ETs. They are genetically-engineered descendents of the Mušgir — wingless, smooth-skinned, diminutive. Originally created by Ušumgal with reprogrammed Mušgir genes, as part of a program in which the Mušgir participated voluntarily. Later numerous other Miminu races were created from cells fabricated by the Kingú. They know how to take orders. Slaves of the male Gina’abul.
Modern Human
Genetic combination of Original Human, Gina’abul, ape.
*According to our strict human ideology about what may be considered human, the Gina’abul are not human beings. Therefore Parks does not refer to Gina’abul women and men, but rather females and males.
The Kadištu live in “higher dimensions” (Angal) and very few of them can enter our third dimension; this doesn’t facilitate direct contact and explains their circuitous fashion of approaching us.
The Kadištu observe us more than ever before, and communicate via the intermediary of people they contact directly or telepathically. But such communications must be taken with great care, because of the possibility of wrong interpretation of what was received. Furthermore, there are many contacts in the form of abductions conducted by the Greys, who are usually in the service of the Gina’abul.
The birthplace of the Gina’abul was in the constellation Draco, which they call Ušu, but numerous conflicts that punctuated their history resulted in the creation and separation of subraces and their spread throughout “our universe.”
Some remain in Ušu, but the Ušumgal and the majority of the Amašutum are in Nalulkára (in Ursa Major), the Kingú in Te (the Eagle), the Mušgir and the Mìmínu (Greys) in Urbar’ra (Lyra), and some Amašutum are found in Mulmul (the Pleiades) where the Anunna were also created.
And it is war that has caught up the Anunna on the Earth.
A great many Sumerian tablets relate the adventures of the Anunna on the blue planet – the Anunnaki – in a sort of extended ode to these Anunna warriors. The chronicles show in detail how they became established and controlled the humanity that they genetically transformed from livestock for their greater pleasure, because the Anunnaki are somewhat lazy. This is how they came to be considered like gods (or, to be more direct, “God“) in the eyes of humanity.
Unfortunately for these Anunnaki, who continue to secretly direct human affairs, humans are in full mutation and will soon jump dimensions… an historic moment long awaited in the history of humanity.
The Amašutum, female Gina’abul, are considered a Kadištu subgroup because of their affiliation and devotion to this semi-Divine race. As such, they are supreme Life Designers.
Note that I am translating Parks’ word planificateur as “Life Designer,” as opposed to the usually more correct “planner.” This is in reference to the current raging debate over Intelligent Design. The Life Designers or planners, whatever one wishes to call them, are superbly-skilled geneticists.
Thus, when deprived of the reproductive role of the Šutum (male Gina’abul), the Amašutum were easily able to preserve their line and multiply their numbers through genetics and their ability to clone to infinity. And where all the Šutum carried their unchanging original genetic material, the Amašutum possessed a great variety of facial appearances and characters, making each of them a unique and remarkable being.
The lifespan of the Amašutum was eternal, because, as opposed to the Šutum, their bodies would periodically undergo the Gibil’lásu (renewal of the skin), similar to the process seen in snakes and certain other reptiles.
There were rumors that certain among them could undergo death and resurrection.
They are issues of two warrior peoples — Kingú-Babbar and Urmah (see Genealogy). But they possess a certain form of wisdom via the Urmah.
Due to their mixed genetic background, they were intended to be employed as neutral agents or messengers capable of adjudicating problems between the Kadištu and the Gina’abul of Tiamate. That is why the Imdugud are totally apart and solitary.
Since their origin here, they were “covered” by their Kingú-Babbar creators, and that made them enemies of the Anunna, who have used them ever since winning the war in our system. But under the influence of the Kingú genitors, the Imdugud have long been obliged to deal with these opposing Gina’abul factions.
Parks does not know if the Imdugud maintain these relations with the Kingú and Anunna today.
“Mìmínu” is the term that I received [for “the Greys“] in the epoch [from which I derive my memories].
How surprised I was to find it later among the Dogons of Mali for whom this word means “ant” decomposed in Sumerian, it gives MÌ-MÍ-NU, “responsible for hostile (or negative) duties” [see Decoder].
This translation is even more interesting because Credo Mutwa names the “Grey” Mantindane or “the torturers” in Zulu [see Decoder].
It is my understanding that the “Greys” came originally from Lyra, the place where numerous Gina’abul colonies are found. [The “Greys“] work as a group and function like ants. They function as a race of workers in service to their reptilian creators.
Various Gina’abul lines have fabricated Mìmínu in the past. There are several kinds of them in different regions. Those that are associated with the solar system and that were therefore created by the Kingu (royal Gina’abul) are larger than the others and have hair.
There is abundant proof of the presence of “Greys” in the solar system, if only by the different cases of abductions reported every year around the globe.
In truth, I don’t know what has happened to the Mìmínu we see today. Their destiny seems to have changed somewhat as they appear to possess a sort of autonomy that they had not had for thousands of years. The story that I relate (thus, that I have received) ends more than 2000 years ago. My knowledge was gained in that epoch.
The Anunna were proposed as a race of warriors to defend the Amašutum against an unseen and amorphous enemy who in fact did not exist. (This dynamic, which we have seen in our time, clearly has ancient roots.) Sa’am, created as asexual (but later modified) was offered by An as the prototype for this race. An had argued that being asexual, they would be without distractions and better soldiers.
However, Tiamata required a sexual (male) race for her Amašutum sisters, since the Šutum were dying out. Sa’am volunteered to create the princely Nungal race for that purpose and to be their leader.
Neither race would have the power of Gibil’lásu (see above), which would have conferred eternal life. However, they were long-lived.
Today’s human is far removed from the Namlú’u, the original or primordial humanoid created by the Kadištu to watch over the animals of the planetary garden that was Uraš (Earth).
As precisely stated in Genesis (1.26), the human was the last specimen to have been integrated into the living reserve of the Life Designers.
The aim of this reserve was to assemble the genetic knowledge of the emissaries of the Source. The original human being was highly respected, because it combined within itself the genetic patrimony of numerous Life Designer species….
Allied races gifted the Namlú’u with several parts of their body structure. Designers of Life such as the Ameli brought the principal element of their marvelous semi-etheric body. All Designers of Life contributed a bit of themselves toward the realization of the Namlú’u.
The Namlú’u thus were magnificent beings, the issue of the collective heritage of the combined sciences of the Kadištu. They were for this reason the living guardians of the knowledge of our universe….
One of the most remarkable manipulations of the Gina’abul is to have alienated the human being in order to produce an animal to serve themselves. For that, the Gina’abul began with the original human that they then mixed with their own genes and those of apes.
The particular mixture that the Gina’abul must have had to cook up in order to obtain their Á-DAM resulted from a composition completely impossible to realize today by human scientists. It required the same type of manipulation that the Kadištu had used to assemble the original human. It is Enki, the son of An and Nammu, who was charged with this doleful dirty work under the constraints that will be described in the second book. I name this genetic combination “mixed blood” in the first book.
I will never give any more information on this subject for the reasons that I have evoked [in the section below, To Be a Clone]. Humanity possesses a prodigious destiny. The aim of humanity is not to reproduce the errors of the reptilians who intended to genetically diminish them, who posed as their creators!
The sad aspect of the Á-DAM-animal is moreover attested by many traditions — notably in the apocryphal texts which are documents from the same period as the biblical scriptures, but were not admitted by the Church. Why not? Because these texts seriously undermine the official version.
Apocryphal Book of Adam, extracts from Chapters 13 and 15, éditions Robert Laffont, 1980:
Who has plunged me into this infinite sadness of evil angels of fetid odor and abominable form? Who has thrown me into the midst of these evil genies? Must I grow in a milieu that I detest, among beings whose works I abhor? Must I take their form, that I live in their dwelling-place? Why has my primitive form changed? Ah! That they would allow me to return to the peaceful sojourn, there to which my heart yearns. That they would return me to the celestial assemblies and the conferences and the prayers filled with peaceful enfusions, that they may illumine me with the light from on high and that I be finally cast from this envelope of opprobrium. How long will I be bound to this body of clay?
Apocryphal The Apocalypse of Adam, gnostic Nag-Hammadi texts, N-H Codex 5, éditions Ganesha, 1989:
Since (the) God has fashioned me of earth, and Eve at the same time, I went with her toward a glory that she had perceived in the eon from which we issued. This one taught me by one word the knowledge of the eternal God. Then we came to resemble the great eternal angels: we were superior, in effect to the God who had fashioned us and to the powers that are with him, but that we know not now. Then, sore with wrath, God, master of the eons and the powers, split us… Since then, we have been instructed, like men, of mortal things. Then, we knew the God who had made us. Because we were not independent of his powers. And we served him in fear and slavery. And in consequence, our hearts were obscured…
Credo Mutwa…names the reptilians who direct this world “the Chitauli,” meaning “dictators” in Zulu. …this term can be translated into Sumerian…. [See Decoder for “Chitauli” and “Gina’abul / lizard(s)”.]
AFRICA a special Place.
by Rick Martinfrom The Spectrum WebsiteMay 2001RICK MARTIN: The weekend of April 28 you may have noticed that all the major prostituted print and broadcast media outlets announced yet another AIDS conference of “goodwill” had just ended in Africa. This latest public relations pageant (or pressure-relief valve) was orchestrated in Nigeria, a location of deep and protracted turmoil.
All the usual array of participants (from politicians to pharmaceutical companies to medical “experts”) promised, with special practiced earnestness for the cameras, to work hard to combat this illness. Meanwhile, The Truth of the matter is far different from the likes of this major propaganda event, broadcast far and wide “coincidentally” with our receiving and sharing of the following heart-wrenching communication.
The deep pain and chronic suffering that is a daily experience for many South Africans has never been more vividly described than in my recent phone conversation with Credo Mutwa. Some of you will recall that we presented a remarkable front-page feature interview with Credo Mutwa back in our October 1999 edition of The SPECTRUM. Things have gotten quite a bit worse in South Africa since we last spoke, particularly as it relates to those infected with and dying from AIDS.
On the morning of April 23, I received a telephone call from David Icke’s publicist for the United States, Royal Adams, relaying a request from Credo Mutwa to speak with me. I am grateful to both Royal Adams and David Icke for considering The SPECTRUM to be the appropriate conduit through which to share this great Zulu shaman’s most impassioned message. I called Credo Mutwa that same morning, and he was as genuine and cordial as I remembered him to be-but with a very serious edge of urgency in his voice.
Actually, words fall terribly short at times like these for their inability to convey the kind of intense emotional impact his voice so tangibly carried. It was as though Credo was speaking before the full assembly at the United Nations, delivering, in very measured wording, the most serious and important appeal imaginable. His plea is on behalf of humanity that the genocide (initiated covertly some years ago as part of the depopulation agenda of the dark, so-called “elite” global controllers) MUST CEASE in the land of Africa – which is rapidly becoming a graveyard populated by the walking dead.
With that brief introduction to a subject of tremendous moral consequence, let me just move directly into the message Credo Mutwa wishes to be shared.
Keep those Kleenex handy.
Credo Mutwa:My call, sir, has to do with the terrible disease which is killing my people, the disease which is called AIDS.
My appeal is this, sir: I don’t know who the people are who created this disease. But in the last 2 years or so, I have handled many cases. I have handled friends of mine who are dying of this disease. And I know now that this disease, sir, is a man-made one.
I wish to appeal to those human beings who created this disease: PLEASE STOP NOW! You have done enough. You have killed enough of the children of Africa. Stop now! Stop! The death of Africa will be the death of the whole world. If it is correct for Dr. Simon Weisenthal to pursue Nazi war criminals many years after the end of the Second World War, will it also not be just and correct for future Africans to pursue these men and these women who have murdered Africa in this terrible way?
There are questions about AIDS which I want to be answered. AIDS is not just a disease. It is a spiritual disaster to our people. It destroys families, sir. It turns children against parents. It turns lovers against each other. It has turned our society upside-down.
But what chills my blood is the paralyzing that I see amongst our leaders. Men and women who suffered and died for the liberation of South Africa are paralyzed like little rabbits in front of a vicious fox when they have to turn around and face AIDS. I do not know what our leaders are afraid of, who they are afraid of. Are there, after all is said and done, humanoid shadows out there who scare our leaders witless?
And I say, sir, to the pharmaceutical organizations in South Africa: you have done enough! Your sham of a court case has been rebuked for what it is-an act of cheap advertisement for drugs which have been rejected in Europe, in America, and elsewhere.
On top of death, you are dumping more death on Africa. Why? I say, to every human being on this planet, AIDS is not a God-made disease! If it was, I would not be trying to fight it-half-educated, semi-literate, and stupid as I am. I say this disease was made BY people, and I am appealing to those people to stop, now! There are names which are being bandied about by frightened people in South Africa, people who talk in whispers. One of the names that is mentioned is the name of the man called [Dr. Robert] Gallo. I say to Mr. Gallo: Remember your common humanity. You have done enough. Stop now![Editor’s note: See Dr. Len Horowitz’s monumental book Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola: Nature, Accident Or Intentional? for a wealth of documentation placing Dr. Gallo, longtime head of the National Institute of Health (NIH) and National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Section on Cellular Control Mechanisms, at center stage in the AIDS arena. Evidence suggests he created the AIDS virus about a decade before he received a lot of political accolades for having “discovered” it.]I say to the pharmaceutical organizations: Sir, you are like octopuses. You have got tentacles sprawling all over the world. You play Jehovah [God] with the lives of our people.
But your tentacles can be lopped-off! You are driving African people into a situation where they will have to turn around and attack you with weapons. And if that happens, you will have only yourselves to blame. I am not threatening anyone. I am only articulating the anger that our people convey to me – as they lay dying, in empty shacks, skeletons wasted to nothing, with skins like brown wet paper.
I say: stop now, my brothers, in the name of our humanity! If your aim is to destroy Africa, say so. Let us fight, and at least die with honor. I say: four of my children are gripped by this terrible scourge. I cannot bear the prospect that I will have to bury my offspring before I die. It is unnatural and obscene. I say, again, to those shadowy organizations in America, and in England, and Canada, and elsewhere: STOP!
You have done enough. Turn off the tap of murder. You have killed enough. STOP!
Or allow us the right of all threatened animals to retaliate, with weapons, for what is being done to us. If there are, out there, the children of the serpent, the Chitauri, the walkers in darkness, let them know this: that I, Credo Mutwa, am not a brave man. But when I see my children ravaged by AIDS, when I see my children turning their eyes, turning away from me, I feel the courage of any beast that watches its offspring being slaughtered by a predator. You have done enough. Conspirators, you have done enough!
Do you know, sir, let me tell you one last thing before I stop. I, and a White doctor, are saving many of our people-not curing them, because we are not allowed to claim that we have a cure for this disease-but the herbal medicine that we use is making people, who have been condemned to go home and die, come back to life. And I am asking that the South African government and the United Nations, if they are not servants to Dark Forces, they must release this medicine and allow us to combat this scourge, until such a time as scientists can come up with a stronger medicine against AIDS.
I will not allow Africa to die! I am sorry, but I will not allow my people to perish! I am only doing my duty as a father and as a Black man, and as a human being, in a country which is being deliberately murdered. I cannot accept, and will not accept, the fact that in the United States, the magazine called TIME, states that there are only 920,000 people with AIDS in the United States. And yet, in sub-Saharan Africa, there are close to 44 million. This is illogical! And I want to know the reason behind it. I’m sorry, sir, but this is how I feel!
Martin: Please don’t apologize.
Credo Mutwa: These conspirators, sir, these ugly entities have shown a dangerous over-confidence, and it is high time we confronted them. I cannot – you know, sir, what happens in South Africa is that a child who has got AIDS runs away from his family and hides himself. And if you, the desperate parent, try to go looking for your child, your child fights you and can hit you with stones and drive you away.
It happened to me, sir.
There are stories which newspapers never dare to print, which are happening in South Africa, centering around AIDS. And the newspapers in South Africa, which are directed by conspirators and liars, do not even try to stop the stigma, which they built-up, against AIDS and its victims. In fact, sir, they are making it worse, with the resolve that people who are suffering from this disease find that they are being rejected by their families. Men die alone, in shacks behind their homes. Women chase their husbands out of their homes. Men murder their wives, sir, because of the spread of AIDS.
I appeal to you, and the editor of The SPECTRUM – please, please, tell the world the hell in which we are living. Please! Like now, I am trying desperately to build clinics in South Africa, with the help of my initiate, Virginia Rathele, and others. But we are being blocked and frustrated at every turn. We are threatened.
My house has been broken into 3 times, and the seeds of the precious and endangered plant, which we use in helping our people, were stolen. But I was able to find more, and I intend to find a piece of land – God knows where and how – to plant them, so that this plant, which is on the brink of extinction, should come back and save our people, which it is doing. I appeal to the world, sir, and to all decent human beings, that the strangle-hold that the Chitauri, the Reptile People, have over humanity, should be broken once and for all. The death of Africa will lead to the death of the entire human race.
People must be aware of that, please. Thank you, sir. But, please, can you please tell me, sir: What should a half-educated man like me do? You know, sir, I expected my kids to bury me when I die. But now it seems it is going to be the other way around. What father can see his children being slaughtered in this way? What parent can allow such an ugly thing? What should a parent legally do against these monsters who have unleashed AIDS?
Everything points to the fact, sir, that AIDS is a man-created disease. In fact, I was telling Mr. David Icke, only a few moments ago, that I have traveled widely through Africa, as you know, and I can tell you one thing that scientists who study AIDS cannot tell you: That people who die of AIDS, sir, immediately after death, show signs of people who have died of arrow poison-you know, as if they’d been shot with a poisoned arrow. They don’t die, merely, of a disease, as would happen in the case of tuberculosis or cancer. Their lips are discolored in a way that I have seen happening with people who had been hit by poisoned arrows. What is it in AIDS that behaves like an arrow poison?
And, another thing, sir: It is said that AIDS began as a disease of homosexuals. But wait. In Africa, most homosexuals do not penetrate each other, sir, as they do in Europe. African homosexuals do the sex act between each other’s thighs, not in each other’s, you now, back passage. So, how does it come that these people get AIDS, when there is no physical contact with the body fluids between them?
Another thing: How does it happen, as I have seen now many times, that you find a family of four – a mother, a father, and two children. You find, sir, that the parents are healthy, but the little kids have got full-blown AIDS. Can someone, kindly, explain this to me, this phenomenon which I have seen in many parts of southern Africa?
Another thing: You find a man who has got full-blown AIDS, and a wife who is free from AIDS, and these people have got a child who is totally free from AIDS. How can one – can anyone on the Earth who reads your paper, sir, kindly explain this amazing phenomenon to me?
What, other than sexual intercourse, what is another thing that is spreading AIDS? I suspect there is something else, but the doctors disagree with me when we talk at conferences. I suspect there is another way by which AIDS spreads through people. Is it an insect, as I suspect, or is it a what?
I don’t know. Please, let wise people out there help me, because these conspirators and their running dogs, these people who work in shadows, are, literally, destroying Africa. And if Africa is destroyed, other races of humankind will follow – one of them being the Black Americans in America. They won’t survive the destruction of Africa.
What is the idea behind Africa’s depopulation? I read a chilling book not so long ago, a book written about the “great” [The word should definitely be contained within quote marks, to depict the actual, opposite meaning of “respect” for this very prolific, now deceased member of a very major family among the so-called “elite” controllers. Credo knows very well that about which he speaks so humbly!] White man, Bertrand Russell. Russell stated that, one day, the Western nations would have to decimate Black people, using war, famine, and disease. And this has happened.
I say, please, you Russell followers, please, you racists and Malthusians, you have done enough harm! Stop now! Stop! In the name of our common humanity, and in the name of the Intelligence that obviously exists behind the Cosmos, the Intelligence which human beings call by the cheap name, God, please stop now!
Index: please click on the link for the index please?
The Central Bank Plan to Monopolize Global Finance
Werner points out that while central banks are promoting CBDCs as digital currency, we’ve had digital currency for decades, so there’s nothing new about the digital aspect of this currency. Cash — paper banknotes and coins — are but a small part — about 3% in most countries — of the total money supply. The rest is digital.
Today, central banks are the only ones authorized to issue banknotes, but regular banks create 97% of the money through lending. They’re not allowed to issue paper notes. Instead, they issue deposit entries into your bank account, which is digital. So, Werner notes, you could say we’ve been using bank digital currency (BDC) for decades.
The difference between BDCs and CBDCs is the centralized aspect. So, what’s happening now is that central banks, which are the regulators of banks, are stepping in to directly compete with the banks they’re regulating. Werner likens it to the umpire joining the game. That obviously makes it an unfair game.
“It is a big danger,” Werner tells Cummins.2“And you can see where this is going. If we allow central bank digital currencies, sooner or later they will drive out the private sector competition. They will drive out the banks.
And, of course, we also have this other problem … that whenever we get a banking crisis and a financial crisis, the regulators get more power because each time they argue, ‘Oh that now happened, it’s different from before and that’s because we still don’t have enough power. We need to have more powers’ …
This is a regulatory moral hazard. If the regulator gets rewarded for failure … you can be sure that we’ll have more crises, because they’ll be given more powers. Now they want to introduce CBDCs, and of course, the best time from their viewpoint is … another banking crisis, so that people want to move their money out of banks …
That’s the easiest way to introduce this, which means we have a massive incentive now for regulators, for central planners, to create another huge financial crisis so that they can then take over.
Of course, then that’s the end of it, because the banking system is not going to recover from this. Now, do we really want this, where essentially the number of banks goes down so much that there’s really only one bank left?
In their 23 years or so of existence, the ECB has killed around 5,000 banks in Europe already, and it wasn’t the big guys … Thousands of banks are gone in America too, and, of course, JP Morgan and the rest are hoovering them up so they’re just becoming big fat mega banks …
It seems the ECB is set up to be the … only bank they want left in Europe, and that’s going to happen if we allow CBDCs. So, we really have to step up now and say, ‘We don’t need this; we already have digital currencies, thank you very much.’”
The longer America remains a lone superpower, the greater the Federal Reserve’s reach over global finance.
After a pandemic and multiple financial crises, we’ve finally entered a lengthy period of rising interest rates. But while most are aware of the ominous outcomes this could create, those who understand how the Fed actually controls interest rates will gain an edge in predicting the future.
Because of recent events ushering in exceptional circumstances, current textbooks describing how the Fed influences interest rates have become obsolete. Until recently, Federal Reserve officials could simply raise and lower interest rates by decreasing and increasing the level of bank reserves in the financial system. Bank reserves are “interbank” money, which can only be used by entities with reserve accounts inside the Federal Reserve System. JPMorgan, for instance, can pay Goldman Sachs for prime New York real estate using its reserves, while the average citizen must use bank deposits or “Federal Reserve Notes,” a fancy term for physical cash.
Before the Great Financial Crisis (GFC), the Federal Reserve had enough power to push interest rates toward its target, commonly known as the Federal Funds rate or EFFR — the price at which banks lend reserves to one another. The U.S central bank did so by adding and removing a specific amount of reserves to and from its interbank system. By lowering the supply of bank reserves, the Fed forced financial institutions to bid up the price of Federal Funds, resulting in higher interest rates throughout money markets. Conversely, by increasing the supply of bank reserves, the Fed influenced interest rates lower. The following graphic from the St. Louis Fed website illustrates these forces at work.
Everything ran smoothly. The Fed set a target range in which interest rates could fluctuate and made the necessary adjustments to keep rates within set boundaries. Conveying and implementing its latest monetary policy stance was a cakewalk.
Then, in 2008, the Great Financial Crisis (GFC) hit, changing the central banking paradigm and the Federal Reserve System forever. The primary catalyst that fueled a radical transformation was the Fed officials’ decision to flood the system with bucketloads of reserves. The amount was staggering. In 2007, the system held a total of $15 billion in reserves. Today, that total has skyrocketed to roughly $3.2 trillion. The Fed’s latest quantitative tightening agenda has been aggressively eliminating bank reserves from the system. Still, it’s long before we return to “normal” levels.
With a system full to the brim with reserves, the Fed could no longer control interest rates through its previous policy of increasing and decreasing levels of interbank money. As shown in the graphic below, the Fed flooding the system with reserves meant that even sizeable supply adjustments no longer influenced the demand curve. The U.S central bank needed a new mechanism to take back control of Federal Funds and fast.
Enter the Fed’s “Ample Reserves” regime, where Fed officials stopped using open market operations (OMOs) — buying and selling government securities to alter reserve levels — as its primary tool to adjust the price of money. On October 6th, 2008, the Fed began paying reserve account holders, mostly large commercial banks and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), interest on their balances. IOER (Interest On Excess Reserves), as it was called back then, had been chosen as the Fed’s chief tool to control interest rates.
By offering banks IOER, a “risk-free” investment option, the Fed gained the power to control money markets through two mechanisms. First, through the “reservation rate,” the lowest rate that banks were willing to loan out funds to the market. Because the Fed started handing out a risk-free investment that paid superior interest (IOER), no entity would want to lend to others at rates lower than the Fed. This set a ceiling on how high rates could go, alongside the Fed’s second mechanism: arbitrage. Fed Funds rarely dropped beneath IOER because entities could create a risk-free arbitrage, borrowing Fed Funds at say 1% and depositing it at the Fed, which paid out 1.5%. The 50 basis points gap would eventually narrow to near zero, as Fed Funds participants competed to arbitrage the spread away.
With these two new levers, the Fed believed it had successfully regained control of money markets. If it wanted to alter rates, the Fed simply adjusted the discount rate and IOER at the same time and by the same level. If the FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) was indicating that rates should rise, money markets could adjust, preemptively pricing in a tightening cycle.
From there, the Fed established a ceiling on interest rates, but a slight problem remained. They also needed to establish a floor on rates. Influential participants in the Fed Funds market, such as Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs), were ineligible to earn interest on their reserve balances. This meant they sometimes pushed money market rates below the Fed’s targets. To counteract this, the Fed created the overnight reverse repo facility, ON RRP. This offered a risk-free investment at a set rate to parties ineligible for IOER, thereby correcting the bug and setting a lower bound on interest rates. Money markets obeyed with minimal fuss.
For now, that was that. After implementing a trio of policy rates (IORB, ON RRP, and the discount rate), the Fed once again felt it had total control of money markets. Yet, it still held one weakness: repo, the shadow banking market that allowed parties to temporarily transform their Treasuries into quasi-bank deposits. By 2019, barely any entities other than a few government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) still participated in the Federal Funds market, as most institutions now had all the reserves they needed. Instead, animal spirits and regulation pushed market participants into repo.
On September 17th, 2019, rates in the repo market exploded higher. Everyone wanted cash, but there was a shortage. Corporate tax payments and increases in Treasury issuance prompted a large decline in reserves. As a result, banks had to cut back on repo lending. Nobody could provide.
Responding to this demand-supply mismatch, the Fed created what it eventually called the “Standing Repo Facility”. This allowed specific entities to obtain cash from the Fed at a set rate using U.S. Treasuries, agency debt, or agency mortgage-backed securities as collateral. The Fed’s gambit worked. Since everyone started borrowing from the central bank, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which tracks the cost of transactions in the repo market, fell from over 5% to within the Fed’s target range.
Fast forward to July 2021, after COVID and the ensuing QE Infinity, IOER along with IORR (interest on required reserves) had grown redundant. The Fed retired these measures in favor of a single benchmark: IORB (Interest on Reserve Balances). QE Infinity had made the term “excess reserves” meaningless.
Since then, it’s been plain sailing for the Fed. It has, at least for now, eliminated potential crises in money markets. If rates soar above its target range, the Fed adjusts IORB or fires up the Standing Repo Facility, bringing rates back into its desired range. At the lower bound, entities barely want to borrow under the Fed’s ON RRP rate, as they’re missing out on a risk-free investment from an entity that can issue debt with no credit or default risk. The Fed’s rate floor has been “leaky” a few times, but everytime it’s been fixed.
So by implementing a trio of policy rates (IORB, ON RRP, and the discount rate), and utilizing its Standing Repo Facility, the Fed has gained a solid grip on money markets. Ever since the repo market blowup, minus a few “hurdles”, the status quo has evolved into stability.
Now, claiming the system is “stable” is what many will deem contrarian. But contrary to popular belief, the Fed has created a more durable system and increased resilience. Most Fed analysis is ideologically driven, not based on validities, so it’s hard to acknowledge.
This, however, does not mean financial markets have been stripped of hazards. With the Fed being able to prevent domestic money market crises, the danger now lies offshore in exotic areas of the financial system.
But once again, the U.S is gradually gaining authority and power over these markets. By providing central bank swap lines and foreign exchange swaps to its closest allies, opening a FIMA facility to seemingly supply emergency dollars to China, and issuing $1 trillion in Treasuries every year till at least 2055, America will increase its grip on global finance, with the U.S. Dollar front and center.
It’s for these and many other reasons that Concoda sees the endgame as not a collapse but the Fed gobbling up every shadow banking paradigm to maintain financial stability. The REM Industrial Complex (Repo, Eurodollar, and Money Market Fund) will continue to fall under the Fed’s umbrella. The U.S dollar hegemony requires a complex, ever-changing financial system, and as it becomes increasingly elaborate and intricate, the Federal Reserve must expand its powers to preserve authority. The so-called world’s central bank possesses almost total control over most of the global monetary system, but if another threat emerges, it can — and will — adapt to the situation, changing the rules of the game once again to keep the monetary system functional and stable.
Despite a brief backlash, everyone — central bank critics, average citizens, and even crypto advocates — will go along with the Fed’s contemporary policies because the alternative is a financial catastrophe so ominous that even collapsitarians will choose to avoid it. When everyone is faced with the real consequences of the so-called Great Financial Reset™, it will be exposed as a mere daydream.
If you enjoyed this, feel free to smash that like button and share a link via social media. Thanks for supporting macro journalism!
with leaders now eager to prevent rising instability in America’s bond market. Their solutions, however, will not only prevent a calamity but stimulate risk assets without the aid of central banks. The era of “Treasury QE” awaits us.
After we warned late last year about rising illiquidity in America’s sovereign bond market, leaders have begun to respond. The unintended consequences of previous policies, regulations, and interventions can no longer be ignored. Earlier this month, authorities revealed their latest mechanism to paint over the cracks in the U.S. empire’s liquidity goliath. Officials announced the first Treasury buyback program in just over two decades, designed to thwart illiquidity in America’s $23 trillion sovereign debt market.
the entire U.S. Treasury market visualized
Over the last decade, the post-financial crisis regulatory establishment has forced the biggest liquidity providers in the Treasury market to retreat. The major players have pulled back from market-making, just as America embarks on its greatest debt expansion in recent history. Regulations such as Basel III and the Dodd-Frank Act have hindered the major liquidity giants through balance sheet constraints, such as the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) and Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The cost of making markets in Treasuries is ever-increasing.
Source: U.S. Treasury
Meanwhile, to achieve its global and domestic aims, the U.S. empire is set to issue around $1 to $2 trillion of (net) Treasury debt each year, all while the ability of financial actors to absorb such an amount is dwindling. Monetary leaders, however, have acknowledged the endgame. The rules and restrictions they have enforced over the last decade have been designed to transfer systemic risk from the big banks to the sovereign (state) level. But to also keep the global liquidity machine churning, they will need to conjure up more monetary alchemy.
Although the details aren’t yet set in stone, the U.S. Treasury will be conducting a Treasury buyback program in 2024 and onwards. It has two objectives: to improve “cash management” — jargon for reducing the volatility of the Treasury’s bank balance (the TGA) — and to boost liquidity in the secondary Treasury market.
Buybacks will also enable the Treasury to replace expensive bonds with those that cost less to service. What’s more, much like the Federal Reserve, the Treasury will become a “dealer of last resort”, acting as a buyer of illiquid bonds when no other participant is willing. Using funds from either bond sales or its bank account at the Fed, the U.S. Treasury will purchase existing bonds in the secondary market (via primary dealers such as JPMorgan and Nomura) to boost liquidity and maybe even suppress yields. Lower yields equal cheaper expenses.
Though Treasury buybacks give them the ability to greatly influence markets, officials have stated that the announced program won’t be extensive enough to act as a bailout in times of stress. If turmoil erupts, other measures will be enacted.
Today, though, the number of tools officials can employ to quash volatility has grown more limited than ever before. The Fed can’t initiate a full-blown pivot of rate cuts and QE without reigniting animal spirits, undoing all efforts to tackle inflation. Its toolbox remains scarce. Instead, officials at both the Fed and U.S. Treasury are doing everything in their power to continue a tightening cycle without reversing course. With a pivot off the table, they have been forced to implement what Concoda calls the “Not-QE corridor”, the new unconventional toolbox.
Much like the Fed’s “Global Jaws”, which depicts the global dollar rates corridor, the “Not-QE corridor” has an upper and lower limit. When the upper boundary is reached, financial conditions have become too loose for the Fed to sit by idly. More rate hikes and QT will follow. Conversely, when the lower limit is reached, financial conditions have tightened enough to warrant Fed intervention. The U.S. central bank has no intention of pivoting until it’s reached its 2% inflation target, so it must invent “stealth QE” facilities, like the BTFP (Bank Term Funding Program).
The Fed has been using all the easing and tightening tools available in its armory, but the U.S. Treasury has yet to wield any. At the upper limit of the Not-QE corridor, the Treasury has chosen to avoid deploying “TQT”: Tighter Quantitative Tightening. With TQT, monetary leaders attempt to tighten conditions further by reducing the Fed’s balance sheet at a faster pace while issuing more long-dated bonds to the market. The greater duration risk of longer-dated bonds causes investors to sell riskier assets to fund these purchases.
Meanwhile, at the lower limit of the Not-QE corridor, the Treasury does not possess any concrete tools to stimulate asset prices. After all, that’s the job of the Federal Reserve. At the start of 2024, however, buybacks will commence, enabling the prospect of Treasury QE.
If inflation remains higher for longer, and the Fed breaks something else not worth pivoting over, the Treasury could join forces with the U.S. central bank to help ease financial conditions. While the Fed implements more Not-QE measures, the Treasury uses buybacks to stimulate risk sentiment. Previous buyback programs have not been used by Treasury officials to specifically stimulate asset prices, yet this time could be different. If politics at the Treasury and the Fed align during a period where a pivot is undesirable, the Fed’s independence could be bypassed.
The first of two mechanisms they could use to stimulate financial assets via buybacks is simple: remove duration risk from the market by buying back longer-dated bonds and swapping them with shorter maturities. Swapping 30-year bonds for 2-year notes will be stimulative. Still, to truly make this “quantitative easing for Treasuries”, officials would have to announce that this is what they’re doing in advance, thereby mimicking the psychological effects that traditional QE (buying bonds with newly printed bank reserves) has on risk assets. Right now, the Treasury has no plans to employ this type of easing. Proposed buybacks will be “duration neutral”. But it’s feasible if desired.
Then, there’s the second Treasury QE mechanism, which this time boosts liquidity in the financial system and potentially increases risk-seeking behavior: Treasury buybacks where the newly issued bond is funded with cash drained from the Fed’s RRP (reverse repo) facility. Unlike the first kind of Treasury QE, easing occurs without Treasury officials ever intending to loosen financial conditions. If a money market fund (MMF) withdraws cash from the RRP facility, a Treasury buyback is all that’s needed to boost “net liquidity”.
Treasury QE visualized (click to enlarge)
Before this type of Treasury QE takes place, the MMF had originally invested in RRPs (reverse repo agreements) offered by the Fed. The result was a stable stream of overnight income for the MMF but a net draining of liquidity from the financial system. RRPs are what Concoda calls “reserve neutralizers”. Bank reserves and deposits are “neutralized” .i.e temporarily removed from the banking system and replaced with the most illiquid cash-like investment: an RRP issued by the Fed. Unlike other short-term investments, cash is locked in the triparty repo platform — which the Fed uses to process RRP transactions — till 3:30 pm the following evening. The price to pay for receiving free money from the Fed is “trapped” intraday liquidity and often inferior returns.
When the MMF invests in an RRP, its commercial bank destroys the MMF’s deposit and sends reserves to the Fed. Once received, the U.S. central bank transforms these reserves into an RRP liability on its balance sheet. Liquidity, in the form of bank deposits and reserves, has been “neutralized”.
The Fed’s RRPs remove bank deposits and reserves temporarily
But when the money fund decides to partake in a buyback by purchasing new bills the U.S. government is offering, this process “de-neutralizes” reserves and deposits, adding once-trapped RRP cash back into the banking system. Overall liquidity has expanded once again. This type of Treasury QE, however, can only be influential if MMFs are willing to unwind their RRP positions with the Fed and take part in upcoming buybacks. If investments other than RRPs, like bills and repo, offer superior returns, only then will this be stimulative. Ultimately, in both scenarios of Treasury QE, Treasury buybacks could be used as a QE-style signaling tool to further encourage investors to withdraw from money market funds (MMFs) and invest in riskier assets, thereby forcing more liquidity into the banking system.
Upon implementing Treasury QE, monetary leaders will have fitted the missing piece in their Not-QE corridor:
Treasury QE via buybacks and “Not-QE” from the Fed will provide a stronger lower bound to ease financial conditions when needed, while QT and TQT achieve the opposite effect. Moreover, if the Fed and Treasury have joint political goals, they can effectively bypass the Fed’s so-called independence, coordinating the easing and tightening of financial conditions. On the flip side, they could also offset one another’s actions. For instance, the Treasury could be “tightening” while the Fed “eases”.
For now, monetary leaders only need to activate some elements of the Not-QE corridor. U.S. Treasury officials have decided not to fire up TQT (Tighter Quantitative Tightening), while “Treasury QE” through buybacks could only come online after 2024 commences. QT (quantitative tightening) and “Not-QE”, meanwhile, remain active. QT is still shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet by $95 billion per month, whereas “Not-QE” is delivering a somewhat stimulative effect to risk assets, without the Fed ever printing reserves to buy bonds outright (actual QE).
Nobody, not even the Fed, seems to know what catalyst will cause officials to finally return to rate cuts, QE, or both. If inflation remains stickier for longer than most expect, the Not-QE corridor won’t collapse anytime soon, and monetary alchemy will prosper. The Treasury market provides those who oversee it the power to control global finance like never before. Yet they’ve chosen not to use it to its full effect. But with Treasury QE on the way, those in charge may give in to temptation. Eventually, these powers may be activated. It’s widely believed that officials are running out of ideas and tools to preserve stability. Yet in reality, the golden age of intervention is yet to come. When Treasury QE arrives, the Great Sovereign Debt Intervention™ will have only just begun.
If you enjoyed this, feel free to hit the ♡ button to let us know and share a link via social media to help us grow. Comments are also encouraged. Thanks for supporting macro journalism!
Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this, you can support our work by buying us a coffee and becoming a subscriber. You’ll receive access to all the content we put out, gain access to discussions, direct email, and more.
If you act on anything provided in this newsletter, you agree to the terms in this disclaimer. Everything in this newsletter is for educational and entertainment purposes only and NOT investment advice. Nothing in this newsletter is an offer to sell or to buy any security. The author is not responsible for any financial loss you may incur by acting on any information provided in this newsletter. Before making any investment decisions, talk to a financial advisor.
can be decomposed as GINA-AB-UL (“veritable ancestor(s) of the splendor”). When one understands the excessive vanity of the beings Parks experienced, one is not surprised by this appellation.
