Pushing for a nuclear war?


Tucker Carlson: ‘Did the US Do It?’

In his September 27, 2022, show, Carlson laid the blame at the feet of the Biden administration. As noted by Carlson, Russia has no reasonable motive for blowing up its own multibillion-dollar pipelines. Those pipelines are part of Russia’s power, wealth and leverage against Europe, which needs Russian energy to survive, both economically and physically.

To quote Carlson, Putin would have to be “a suicidal moron” to waste that leverage, for any reason. If he wanted to cripple Europe by shutting off the gas, he could do that without destroying the equipment. Indeed, he’d already done just that.

Other countries, however, may gain from the destruction of those pipelines, and at least two U.S. officials have openly called for it.

Carlson showed footage from a February 2022 White House press conference in which President Biden warns that if Russia invades Ukraine, the U.S. will “bring an end” to Nord Stream 2. When asked, “But how will you do that, exactly, since the project is within Germany’s control?” Biden replied, “I promise you, we will be able to do it.”

Victoria Nuland, under secretary for political affairs at the U.S. State Department, made similar promises in January 2022, when she stated that “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

Jeffrey Sachs: ‘The US Probably Did It’

Link: “We are on a path of escalation to nuclear war, nothing less” – Jeffrey D. Sachs – YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5m8m9RNxjw

Another person who believes the U.S. is responsible is Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs,12 an economist, public policy analyst, director of the Center for Sustainable Development and chairman of the Lancet Commission, who, by the way, has also been outspoken about his suspicions that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from a U.S.-backed research program in China.

In a recent Bloomberg interview, Sachs suggested the pipelines were struck by the U.S. as a means of damaging the Russian economy, something that sanctions have failed to accomplish. Bloomberg host Tom Keene quickly interjected saying, “Jeff, we’ve got to stop there … What evidence do you have of that?” Sachs responded:13

“Well, first, there is direct radar evidence that US military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk were circling over this area. We also had the threat from … [Nuland] earlier this year that ‘one way or another we are going to end Nord Stream.’

We also had a remarkable statement from Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken last Friday in a press conference where he said ‘this is also a tremendous opportunity.’ It’s a strange way to talk if you’re worried about piracy on international infrastructure of vital significance.

I know it runs counter to our narrative; you’re not allowed to say these things in the West. But the fact of the matter is, all over the world, when I talk to people, they think the U.S. did it. Even reporters on our papers that are involved tell me ‘of course’ (the U.S. did it), but it doesn’t show up in our media.”

An Act of Environmental Terrorism

https://youtube.com/watch?v=fFuRSfKFc4Q%3Fwmode%3Dtransparent%26rel%3D0

Carlson also highlighted the environmental impacts of this sabotage. Enormous amounts of natural gas are streaming into the Baltic Sea, which may have a dire effect on marine mammals in the area.

The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time in its effect on the environment. If they did this, it would be the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has EVER done. ~ Tucker Carlson

Natural gas is also comprised of 90% methane, a key driver, allegedly, of manmade global warming, which climate change activists insist poses an acute and lethal threat to all mankind.

“So, if you’re worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come,” Carlson says.

Biden has declared climate change the most pressing emergency in the history of the world. If his administration is responsible for blowing up these pipelines, then they’re also responsible for massively worsening climate change, as the methane emitted from these pipelines far outweigh the methane released from cows, for example, which the Green Agenda is so intent on eliminating in order to “save the planet.” As noted by Carlson:

“The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time in its effect on the environment. If they did this, it would be the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has EVER done.

But it would also be totally consistent with what they do … They destroy. These people build nothing. Not one thing. Instead, they tear down and they desecrate — from historic statues, to the Constitution, to energy infrastructure.

And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it. They’re just preparing for the inevitable fallout. Tonight, the Senate just prepared a spending bill with $35 million for the Department of Energy to ‘prepare for and respond to potential radiological incidences in Ukraine.'”

That bill brings U.S. expenditure on Ukraine, for its war effort and funding of its government and energy, to $67 billion. According to Carlson, that’s more than Russia’s entire military budget for 2021.

What Will Happen Next?

Another obvious question that remains to be answered is, what next? As Carlson points out, if the U.S. is responsible for blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, we have basically entered into direct war with Russia, one of the greatest nuclear powers on the planet.

And, certainly, it’s reasonable to suspect that this kind of industrial terrorism, this intentional sabotage, will have consequences. Aside from a nuclear response, Russia could conceivably respond by severing underwater power and data cables, which would immediately cripple Western nations.

In his Bloomberg interview, Sachs discussed his deep concerns about where we’re headed. He correctly highlighted that the world is in a period of unprecedented instability, with the potential for nuclear war looming, at the same time as we’re suffering hyperinflationenergy shortages and more.

What’s worse, there are no efforts to address any of these issues. Instead, world leaders are acting in a manner that escalates and worsens the situation. “So many provocations in the midst of huge instability!” Sachs said.

Cui Bono?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=FD6cadL6V74%3Fwmode%3Dtransparent%26rel%3D0

So, who would actually benefit from the destruction of the two Nord Stream pipelines, one of which, by the way, had not even opened yet (Nord Stream 2). The U.S. certainly appears to have both motive and intention. U.S. officials have publicly stated that they would “one way or another” eliminate Nord Stream 2 if Russia decided to invade Ukraine, which, of course, it did.

By sabotaging the pipelines, the U.S. stands to gain financially by increasing its own natural gas exports, and it gains by weakening Russia’s income potential and leverage over Europe. The loss of the pipelines also benefits the U.S. by putting Europe in a situation where it cannot be tempted to leave America’s side against Russia. As noted by The American Conservative:14

“Winter is soon arriving in Europe. If European peoples get tired of being cold, and/or paying a fortune for heating, they may take to the streets to demand that their governments push for peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, so that the flow of Russian gas can start again. But now, with the Nord Stream pipelines badly damaged, that possibility has been foreclosed …”

Poland may also benefit, as it just opened its own pipeline, as might Israel,15,16 which entered into negotiations with the European Union to supply natural gas when Russia started cutting off supplies (see video above).

Russia, meanwhile, just lost a multibillion-dollar investment, long-term wealth potential and hence geopolitical power, and present-day leverage against NATO sanctions.

Aside from “sending a message” that it’s willing to destroy civilian infrastructure, it gains nothing from sabotaging its own pipelines, and such a message would have been far clearer and more rational had they attacked someone else’s infrastructure and not its own. 

Is the US Shutting Down Power to Europe?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checke

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • September 26, 2022, massive “leaks” were detected in two Russian pipelines, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, which deliver natural gas from Russia to Europe underneath the Baltic Sea
  • It was quickly determined the leaks were the result of intentional sabotage. Germany will partner with Denmark and Sweden to investigate the explosions using navy, police and intelligence services from the three countries
  • One day after the Nord Stream sabotage, a new Polish natural gas pipeline was inaugurated. Israel has also been in negotiations with the EU to supply natural gas to Europe
  • Western officials and media blame Russia itself. The Washington Post suggested Russian President Vladimir Putin is “weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines,” and Bob Rae, Canada’s ambassador to the United Nations, accused Russia of “using pollution as an act of war.” Putin has dismissed such allegations as “stupid,” and is placing the blame on the U.S.
  • In a September 27, 2022, show, Fox News host Tucker Carlson laid the blame at the feet of the Biden administration. Columbia University professor Jeffrey Sachs, an economist and public policy analyst, also believes the pipelines were struck by the U.S. as a means of damaging the Russian economy, something that sanctions have failed to accomplish

September 26, 2022, massive “leaks” were detected in two Russian pipelines, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2, which deliver natural gas from Russia to Europe underneath the Baltic Sea.

Within a couple of days, several countries, including Russia, agreed the leaks were the result of intentional sabotage or, to quote Fox News host Tucker Carlson (above), “an act of industrial terrorism.” Obvious questions include who did it? Why? And why now?

Incidentally, just one day after the Nord Stream sabotage, a new Polish pipeline was inaugurated. As reported by the Pipeline Technology Journal, the Baltic Pipe will “help Poland and Europe reduce their longstanding dependency on Russian natural gas” by transporting gas from Norway via Denmark to Poland and neighboring nations.1

Military Readiness Escalates

According to Naval News, Nordic countries have heightened their military readiness in response to the sabotage:2

“The explosions took place in the Swedish and Danish exclusive economic zones, and the Danish Navy was quick to send both naval and airborne units to investigate, while on the Swedish side the Coast Guard is responsible with the Navy standing by to provide assistance if needed …

Closer to the other end of the pipeline, Finland has declined to comment on whether there is an increase in readiness following the Nordstream leaks in line with a longstanding policy of ambiguity …

A country that has been open with their heightened readiness is Norway. The European oil and gas powerhouse had already before the incidents reported on unidentified drone activity close to their energy infrastructure in the North Sea, and in the aftermath of the incident the Norwegian government has decided on heightened security at the Norwegian oil and gas infrastructure …

[Norwegian] Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre has accepted offers of help from Germany, France and the UK to increase the security surrounding the North Sea oil and gas infrastructure.”

Germany has announced it will partner with Denmark and Sweden to investigate the sabotage using navy, police and intelligence services from the three countries.3

Who’s Being Blamed?

Several countries have officially condemned the brazen attack on civilian infrastructure, including the U.K. Ministry of Defense4 and the NATO alliance as a whole. In a September 29, 2022, statement, NATO said attacks on allies’ critical infrastructure will be met with “a united and determined response.”5

Fatih Birol, head of the Paris-based International Energy Agency — which provides energy policy recommendations, analysis and data for 42 countries — said it was “very obvious” who was behind the sabotage but didn’t specify who that might be.6

Western officials and media have by and large blamed Russia itself. The Washington Post Suggested Russian President Vladimir Putin is “fully weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.” Bob Rae, Canada’s ambassador to the United Nations, accused Russia of “using pollution as an act of war.”7

The Center for Strategic & International Studies admitted that Russia’s motives for attacking its own pipelines are unclear, but that it “may be warning and signaling to Europe and the West that it is willing to target civilian infrastructure.”8 Putin has dismissed such allegations as “stupid,” and is placing the blame on the West, the U.S. in particular.9 As reported by Yahoo News:10

“Russian officials have said Washington had a motive as it wants to sell more liquefied natural gas (LNG) to Europe. President Vladimir Putin said … the United States and its allies blew up Nord Stream. ‘The sanctions were not enough for the Anglo-Saxons: they moved onto sabotage,’ he said … [The] White House has dismissed the accusation that it was responsible …

[If] it was an act of sabotage, it has damaged pipelines that were built by Kremlin-controlled Gazprom and its European partners at a cost that ran into billions of dollars.

The damage also means Russia loses an element of leverage it still had over Europe, which has been racing to find other gas supplies for winter, even if the Nord Stream pipelines where not pumping gas when the leaks were discovered, analysts say.

Whoever or whatever is to blame, Ukraine may also be a beneficiary. Kyiv has long called for Europe to halt all purchases of Russian fuel — even though some gas still runs to Europe across its territory. Disrupting Nord Stream brings Kyiv’s call for a full Russian fuel embargo closer to reality.”

European security officials claim Russian navy support ships and submarines were observed in the vicinity of the leaks. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov rebutted saying “a much larger” NATO presence was also in the area.11 As mentioned earlier, Norwegian authorities have also reported “unidentified drone activity” near other energy infrastructure in the North Sea.

For now, the answer to who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines remains elusive. It seems all we can do is wait for the results of the German-Nordic alliance’s investigation, and hope that cooler heads prevail.

Lies, Lies everywhere?

The covid story as an example:

Pfizer Exec Admits COVID Vaccine Was Not Tested for Preventing Transmission

A Pfizer executive said Monday that before Pfizer released its COVID-19 vaccine into the market, neither she nor other Pfizer officials knew whether the vaccine would prevent transmission because the drugmaker hadn’t tested for it.

Link copied

Pfizer covid vaccine transmission test feature

By Jack Phillips

A Pfizer executive said Monday that neither she nor other Pfizer officials knew whether its COVID-19 vaccine would stop transmission before entering the market last year.

Member of the European Parliament, Rob Roos, asked during a session:

“Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? Did we know about stopping immunization before it entered the market?”

Pfizer’s Janine Small, president of international developed markets, said in response:

“No … You know, we had to … really move at the speed of science to know what is taking place in the market.”

Roos, of the Netherlands, argued in a Twitter video Monday that following Small’s comments to him, millions of people around the world were duped by pharmaceutical companies and governments.

link:

“Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others,’” Roos said. “Now, this turned out to be a cheap lie” and “should be exposed,” he added.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-et%2F&sessionId=525c86702d869f3069e77ef5baac98ed08bd0f1f&siteScreenName=ChildrensHD&theme=light&widgetsVersion=1c23387b1f70c%3A1664388199485&width=550px

The Epoch Times has contacted Pfizer for comment.

What was said

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration wrote in late 2020 that there was no data available to determine whether the vaccine would prevent transmission and for how long it would protect against transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.

“At this time, data are not available to make a determination about how long the vaccine will provide protection, nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person,” the agency specifically noted.

Meanwhile, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, around the same time, said his firm was “not certain” if those who receive its mRNA vaccine will be able to transmit COVID-19 to other people.

”I think this is something that needs to be examined. We are not certain about that right now,” Bourla told NBC News in December 2020 in response to a question about transmissibility.

Former White House medical adviser Dr. Deborah Birx in June revealed that there was evidence in December 2020 that individuals who received COVID-19 vaccines, including Pfizer’s, could still transmit the virus.

“We knew early on in January of 2021, in late December of 2020, that reinfection was occurring after natural infection,” Birx, the White House COVID-19 response coordinator during the Trump administration, told members of Congress this year.

Maine Medical Board Grills Dr. Meryl Nass in What Attorney Calls ‘Abuse of Regulatory Process’

‘Everyday Heroes’? Pfizer Taps Marvel’s Avengers to Push COVID Boosters to Kids

Pfizer Exec Admits COVID Vaccine Was Not Tested for Preventing Transmission

MORE NEWS

Latest Views

More Manmade Pandemics Are Coming — Here’s Why

Here’s What MedPage Today Got Wrong in Its Critique of Florida’s Study on mRNA Vaccine Safety

Ditching Google, Tainted Blood and Standing Up to Tyranny: ‘This Week’ With Mary + Polly

MORE VIEWS

Get FREE News & Updates

Worldwide nuclear based genocide war Games as played in the US/White house.

At its basis’s the fact that the governments in the US and Europe/EU are taken over/controlled by the Cabal/NWO. The Bric’s countries also owned by the Cabal (Big Banks) but not the complete media like in the West.

I realize that a number of my readers will shake their head and exit. So, it will be!

Playing war games in the US.

Depending on how one intends in the dreamtime, the results of one’s intentions appear to manifest in just one’s private experience or also in the experience of so-called others. For example, in the case of playing war games with tanks, some students of psychokinesis will have a tank disappear from their view, or from a few people’s view, but not from everyone’s view.


A master of psychokinesis should have control over how the result manifests and not leave it to chance. If the intention is to disable the destructive potential of a nuclear missile heading towards a target, then it should disappear from everyone’s point of view. However, if the intention is to get people to minimize their time in Hell, then it is better for those who are headed there to suffer from nuclear war and burn off some of the sin through suffering before they die. At least, that is the case assuming that they do not further compound their misdeeds as a result. Parallel universes can be invoked so that only those who advance the goal of nuclear war actually suffer from it. This is very important to understand because those pushing the world towards annihilation have anger in their minds directed towards others that they want to cause to suffer or die. Yet those people, by the very fact of that anger and partiality of mind do not have certainty of action. They cannot ensure that it is others, and not themselves and those that they are attached to that will end up the victims.
In actual fact, their anger will cause them to suffer in the nuclear war with certainty and not even be able to die a quick death from it. It is a promise that God has already made, and they do not have the ability to undo.
What they do have the ability to do, if they so choose, is to repent of their anger and plans for nuclear war, and beg God’s forgiveness. Then if they destroy the weapons and the threat to everyone that is the result of their existence, they too can avoid the intense suffering of radiation sickness, and the much worse fires and suffering of Hell itself. If the US government did not believe in Hell, then why have they commanded their remote viewers not to investigate its existence, its conditions, and how beings end up there. It is critical intelligence for making an informed decision.

Would you invest in a bank before checking its credit rating and solvency?
Why believe instead in the words of a government that cannot even run an occupation successfully in a third world country?
They have no certainty of action and their approval ratings show that the public knows it.
So how can you keep your blinders on without massive doses of intentional ignorance –called stupidity?
Is it good to emulate stupidity? Will stupidity save you from suffering? Or is it a failed option, one that never had a chance to help anyone, let alone a government that inherited nuclear weapons?
Ultimately, it is the case that different people experience the same event differently anyway. But this effect is greatly exaggerated when a strong intender is trying to get the optimal result for everyone in terms of
minimizing their future suffering. For example, when Christ preformed miracles, some people saw people being healed or were healed themselves. Others without faith only saw a faker making trouble and wanted him stopped even if it took killing him to do so. The results that people got from coming to see Christ depended on their own state of mind. That said, I will now talk about some of the experiments that the US military did on psychokinesis and what they said about the results of them.
One of the tests that I participated in was on whether psychokinesis could be used to disable incoming nuclear missiles. This was a test that I designed myself as I had complained that Star Wars was ludicrous as one could do better, without technical difficulties or cost, just by intending the result that one wanted. Because I had made these comments at a JCS meeting during Reagan’s second term, one of the Generals present asked for me to put on a demo that Reagan could easily attend –as opposed to one out at the Nevada Test Site like some of the earlier ones that I had been involved in.
As a result, I was standing in the Oval Office with Reagan at the time that this particular teat was run, and the Pentagon was monitoring the results and conveying the results to Reagan by phone. Three planes were sent up and asked to fire missiles at a target –in this case the missiles were non-nuclear that fragmented into hundreds of pieces mimicking a multiple warhead nuclear weapon. The pieces were luminescent –like phosphorus tracers and easy to see in the night sky as well as to photograph. The military made a number of runs, conducted at a distant base in Okalahoma, if I remember correctly. Then they asked me to “deflect the rounds”.

At first, they believed that the missiles were not firing from the planes because they saw no tracers.
But when the planes landed, indeed the missiles were missing.

62
As the evening progressed, they asked me to let the tracers start to show and then disappear so they could see where the psychokinesis was occurring in the sky.
Remember that this is happening half a continent away from my physical location per their thinking. The next run recorded on film showed dots of light followed by darkness. They were of such brief duration that only a few of them were caught on the film, so they asked me to let the tracers show for longer.
Now I am calling them tracers because they were luminescent but in fact they were large missiles of phosphorus on the order of a ton each. They lit up the sky very brightly before I was asked to demonstrate their psychokinetic destruction. Because the military wanted to track their psychokinetic decay, which was really instantaneous, I had to change my intention to a slower decay.
So I let the missiles fizzle out like a balloon that is released without being tied. That gave a thin strand of
light rather like a large firefly for each fragment.
Although the pretests had lots of phosphorus hitting the ground in pieces, and setting fields on fire, my runs had no fires starting and later examination in the morning did not find any phosphorus on the ground below.
The military had trouble believing that it had the right area and insisted on repeating the test.
The second test was done the next day during daylight at another base, in the desert.
In this case the military spread out large blue plastic tarps and looked for burns and melted plastic to judge how well I had done in destroying the missiles with my mind. Again, when we started, they did not believe that I had destroyed the missiles even though the planes came back without them, since they saw nothing.
So I ended up having to let a trace of the phosphorus start its burn and drop to the ground before getting rid of the rest so that they would believe me and believe that the missiles were over the plastic tarp area which was about the length of a runway and about 20 feet wide. I am a bit of a prankster so I arranged the first drops of the phosphorus to be in even lines on only the first tarp. One general later accused me of rigging the test though in fact I was more than half a continent away and everything I did occurred by the use of my mind not my hands as he accused me of.
The real issue was whether one could evaporate a nuclear weapon without having radioactive dust hit the
ground. So the next test was one of putting uranium in a conventional missile as a dirty bomb. This was done at the Nevada Test Site in case I failed and again I was not on site. I was standing in Casey’s office at CIA HQ at the time with Reagan on the phone. The size of the bomb was about 500 lbs and the amount of radiation would have been substantial. The fallout downwind could have been a real problem and some Generals had objected to the test on that basis as it was after the Limited Test Ban Treaty. While there was no nuclear explosion perse and so there was no violation of the letter of the treaty, the amount of potential release of radiation was nearly half of the first A-bomb released over Japan. Given that being the case, the test was delayed until an almost windless day. I was not quite clear about the logic of that since I doubted that the radiation would be swept up by brooms before the next windy day. However, I had no intention of failing and so I went forward with the test. I am used to having certainty of result in that personality. It is because of that certainty of result that I have often been used for these tests. The result of the test was that there was no increase in radiation detected afterwards compared to what had been at the site previously. Some scientists objected that the radiation levels were slightly lower than they had been before and said that the results might not have been from getting rid of the radiation in the bomb as much as getting rid of it on the ground afterwards. I found that a moot point.
After all the point was to prevent fallout that could hurt people.

63
That test was followed a few months later by more sophisticated tests on decreasing specific types of radiation –such as gamma rays versus alpha waves. It really made no difference –it was only a difference in the intention.
Those tests were run underground in caverns already created by nuclear explosions. The tests showed that the mind could evaporate a ton of highly radioactive material instantaneously. In this case we had visuals directly from security camera in the cavern. In one frame the ton of uranium is there and in the next it was almost not and the second one it was gone. People accused me of getting kickbacks from the uranium ore company that I wasted a ton of the precious material but that was not the case. Here I have omitted details of the actual tests because of true national security reasons. Omission of the details in this specific case will not prevent countries from protecting themselves from nuclear war and fallout.
The next set of tests that I want to mention happened a few years later in the Bush Sr. administration. These tests involved me at the site of the radiation, in this case at the Nevada Test Site primarily. I was asked to walk through radioactive caverns and ingest large lethal doses of radiation to test my abilities. Really it was a little bizarre since I could decontaminate a whole cavern of the radiation after an atomic explosion, so there was no need to force me to ingest lethal doses before I decontaminated it.

The experiments verged on the sadistic and except that I had very unusual abilities relative to my body I would not have survived them.12
The Gnome nuclear blast cavity (above), located 1,184’ below Carlsbad, New Mexico is another test-site
that was likely used for these very sensitive radiation abatement and clean-up experiments. Arrigo
documents an astonishing feat of human consciousness that, if replicated on a larger scale, could
reverse the contamination of our planet and the destiny of our species. However, she also warns that the
feasibility of radiation abatement by psychokinetic masters has fed into the Nazi US government
genocidal fantasies by providing a potential means to clean up their premeditated radiation disaster.

64
When I arrived up at the Mount Weather base in October of 2003, I quickly discovered that I had been recalled from Canada because the US had run out of more conventional solutions to a problem that they felt was urgent to solve.

The problem was explained to me by the Commander of Mount Weather as “We plan to use this base
for its intended function (to house the US officials in the event of nuclear war) but all of the remote viewers say that no one will survive a nuclear war here… You are the one that says everything is possible… You are the one that we trust to be able to do it.”
“Perhaps you misunderstand what I say at the beginning of my remote viewing training intensives –I say that anything that is ethical to do can be done.”
“What is unethical about saving the life of the President and his advisors?” he asked.
“Billions of other people dead from the nuclear war.” I replied.
“But the scientists have calculated out the number of people that need to survive to have enough genetic
variation for the species to continue and they put the number at 210 families. We will have 240 for extra margin of safety.” I looked down at my shoes in embarrassment. Not only were the scientists wrong per my intuition, but also, I had just been told that the US government intended to nuke everyone off the face of the planet and leave only 240 families in a hole in the ground…
I called Tenet at CIA Headquarters and asked to speak to him… He said “There have been changes around
here since I last saw you. They (the White House) believe nuclear war is inevitable, only a matter of time. They want” and his voice quavered momentarily “to schedule the end as part of a ceremony, on a solstice, for the best effect… This is for real. This is the way they see it. Take everyone else out and start over—just them. That way there is no overpopulation; no racial tension; no exhaustion of the petroleum reserves. They can’t imagine life without oil. They don’t want to share what is left of it…”

“But that is insane” I replied. “We can go to another source of fuel. We can create new solutions.”
“That is not the way they see it. They don’t have the confidence that you have. They don’t believe that creativity will always find a solution… They want you to bring [the radiation] back down to normal background levels after everyone else is dead, down to normal again like you did at the Nevada Test Site demonstration.”
“I can’t do that to preserve the lives of mass murderers.” I replied…
“I refuse to help them kill off the planet’s life, even if I could do what they wanted, which I can’t”…

65
Over the next few days [Senator Jay] Rockefeller [at left] showed up a number of times with contractors to explain to them what he wanted changed in his “privatized part” of the underground facility.
While most of the facility was not much different in style than the inside of CIA headquarters, there were some notable exceptions.
Rockefeller’s section already looked like the inside of the New York Metropolitan Museum filled with precious art objects and with high vaulted gothic ceilings. He now ordered that his section be expanded from mansion-size to three times as large, and a new swimming pool installed which was about Olympic-sized. I was not happy with this change as an enormous amount of dust was generated by this construction over the many months it took to complete and that overloaded the air filtering system which had to be replaced and upgraded again to handle the extra interior volume. The facility was now about 9% larger overall. And the construction thinned the wall of rock that was acting to make the shelter safe.
Even in the construction of this ‘albatross’ the concerned parties were unable to agree on what was fair in terms of size or number of people to be admitted to it.
Rockefeller intended to bring in whomever he wanted at the last moment, including all the “cousins” that he liked and their children. Officially, there were only two Rockefellers on the list [–Jay and his uncle David] …


I wrote up my remote viewing findings on the Mount Weather [radiation shelter scenario] over the month of October 2003. Those retreating to the base in the event of a nuclear war would almost certainly kill each other off long before the radiation levels became livable. There would be too many alpha-males in a small space.


Minor disagreements would be magnified in a confined space under stress. Major disagreements that already divided them would be even harder to check than before. By having killed billions of innocent human beings, the taboo against killing would be so weakened as to be non-existent. They would kill each other, just as they had killed others.


The next day, on about November 4, 2003, I was called into the White House to explain my report in person to Bush Jr. and Bush Sr. as they were upset by the content of it. Also present in the Oval Office at the time were Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, but no one else… Only three copies of that report had been made “for eyes only”; one for the President, one for Tenet, and one for the Commander of Mount Weather whose duty it was to report to the JCS on all matters concerning that base…


Rumsfeld wanted me to go point by point through my report on why a nuclear first strike would not be
survivable. The report that I had written was about fourteen pages long, plus an appendix, which was over two hundred pages and went through the actual remote viewing analyses… What one sees as a viewer are possible futures.
My specialty in remote viewing has been to develop the analyses so that those possible futures have reliable probabilities assigned to them. Since I have a mathematical training and have done much stock prediction in one personality, I have been able to scientifically validate the analyses that I developed…
It has to do with holographic mind—a way of seeing all the possibilities at once in a flash of understanding.


Most people have never experienced such an understanding and cannot believe that such a state of mind is possible… So, to convince them I gave them the experience of holographic mind for a while. It is such a
different way of understanding the world that most people cannot hold that understanding after they come out of it. All they can do is know that they had the experience of the understanding briefly. It is like looking at a city map before folding it up again. You know that you saw it but you couldn’t say much about what it was that you saw, and you couldn’t reproduce the map from memory. But having been shown it by someone telling you directions, you can believe that they do know how to direct you to get to your destination. So, after I explained holographic analysis and demonstrated it, they no longer questioned my assertions about the probability of the events that I discussed in my report. None-the-less, Rumsfeld wanted me to go through each point carefully to make sure that I had not overlooked anything. So, I did.

66
When I got to the point of asserting that the survivors would have to stay in the shelter for over 5 years in order to not die in their first month out of it, Rumsfeld wanted to know why I was able to conclude that? Would no remote viewer be able to bring down the radiation any better than that? I tried to demonstrate that by putting them back into holographic mind but their nausea in witnessing their possible future radiation sickness was too great for them to stand and they refused to continue with the demonstration.

I said that if they could not even stand to remote view how nauseated they might be in the future that they shouldn’t undertake the course of action that led to that…
As we continued stepping through the report, it dawned on Rumsfeld that I might be right that nuclear first strike would not be survivable. As Rumsfeld started to agree with me and with Tenet that it was a bad idea, Cheney began attacking me personally. The attacks were not based on the evidence, but on his perception of me being “disloyal” for not agreeing with him… Finally, Rumsfeld asked to at least be allowed to hear me out. Cheney refused and said that I was poisoning their minds against the plan. He stated that the only reason that Tenet was no longer in favor of the plan was because of his contact with me. He then started swearing at me and calling me obscenities.
I told them to get a remote viewer that they could trust and walked out of the Oval Office. Before I made it out of the building I was handcuffed and escorted back to the Oval Office where I was berated for my “uncooperative attitude”. I said that I would not speak as long as the handcuffs were on me. I was sent to the basement holding cell where for two days I did not say a word. On the third day, the handcuffs were removed, and I was escorted back up to a room on the first floor. There I was given a fresh set of clothes and told to shower. I did so and was escorted again into the Oval Office. Bush Sr. asked me how long it would take for me to train another remote viewer to take my place. I pointed out that over the decades I had trained hundreds of good viewers, especially for the Office of Naval Intelligence and that they could easily replace me with one of those men.
Bush Jr. asked me if any of them could affect radiation levels as well as I could, and I replied, “If you want to know, test them.” That is how it got left. I was to continue finding ways to make Mt. Weather survivable until I was replaced by one of my students…
Then about six months after they started looking for a replacement for me, I was called to the White House and told to finish training a particular ONI student of mine up to my level of competency in radiation abatement…


The ONI officer had slowed the rate of radioactive emissions… to one twenty-eighth of what was expected. In front of Bush Jr., I asked the naval officer to repeat the experiment while knowing that the US elite planned to use his skill to bail them out after killing off the rest of the humans on the planet. The naval officer fainted dead away. After he recovered from the shock, the test was repeated back at ONI HQ’s. The atomic clock advanced 26 hours in 24 hours under these conditions, which means that the radioactive emission of the Cesium was higher and thus more toxic.
The ONI then tested another 3 of their best psycho-kinesis officers with this unethical scenario with clock
results that varied from 18 hours to 32 hours in day’s test. They even insisted on re-testing me at this task with the result that the clock ran 24-hours in a 24-hour period and I was accused of not trying… The US
administration refused to believe that I could not do what they wanted. They have no understanding of spiritual law and how [radiation abatement] effects are achieved…13
Arrigo’s ability to determine the ethical balance enables her accuracy in considering all of the possible
outcomes, not only the desired set of outcomes. In her explications, Arrigo confirms that the universal
laws of physics cannot be altered carelessly, but only through focused, compassionate intent:
Since I was involved in much of that research as a gifted psychokinetic expert and trainer, I feel that it is my responsibility to make sure that radiation abatement is used to help the planet, not as a rescue strategy after a first strike. It is completely immoral and unconscionable to launch nuclear weapons to kill everyone above ground and then reverse the radiation and come out of one’s shelter to have all of the oil just for oneself and one’s progeny. I cannot remain silent given what I know about the US plans, even though they tortured me again last week in Nyon, Switzerland in a makeshift torture chamber in a basement to try to silence me.14
Dr. Arrigo’s insider accounts show the global nuclear threat to have grown from the ignorance and greed
of petty old men who fear their own eminent demise and perhaps the impending suffering of their next
incarnation, brought upon themselves by orchestrating mass murder for the better part of their adult lives.
These are the products of generational cycles of ritualized child torture and entrapment that now govern
the US. Indeed, it is a simple problem of psychopathic liars believing their own lies.

One thought on “Pushing for a nuclear war?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *