global power to
“Please Listen: The UN Just Handed Tech Companies Global Power…” Whitney Webb
Inner Conspiracy
3,63K abonnees
4.639 weergaven 29 okt 2025
I need you to stop what you’re doing and pay attention to what might be the most significant power transfer of our lifetime… happening right now at the United Nations.
While everyone’s been distracted by election drama and celebrity gossip, the UN just quietly handed unprecedented global power to tech companies like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI. T
his isn’t speculation – it’s happening in plain sight, and almost no one is talking about it.
What I’m about to reveal connects Silicon Valley directly to global governance in a way that should
terrify every American who values their freedom and privacy.
You need you to stop what you redoing and pay attention to what might be the most significant power transfer of our lifetime happening right now at the United Nations.
While everyone’s been distracted by election drama and celebrity gossip, the UN just quietly handed unprecedented global power to tech companies like Microsoft, Google,
and Open AI.
This isn’t te speculation.
It’s happening in plain sight, and almost no one is talking about it. What I am about to reveal connects Silicon Valley directly to global governance in a way that should terrify every American who values their freedom and privacy.
Let me break this down for you. In August 2025, the UN General Assembly adopted resolution A RS79325 establishing something called the global dialogue on AI governance and an independent international scientific panel on artificial intelligence.
Sounds harmless, right? That is exactly what they want you to think. What most people don’t realize is that these R& just bureaucratic talking shops.
They read the framework for a new global power structure where tech companies are literally writing the rules that will govern AI worldwide.
And these aren’t just any rules. They’ll determine what you can say online, what information you can access, and potentially who gets flagged as a threat.
To understand this, we need to go back to the foundations of this plan. For years, the United Nations has been quietly building the infrastructure for global digital governance.
The global digital compact was conceived overnight.
It represents the culmination of a long-term strategy to centralize control over the digital realm with artificial intelligence as the crown jewel.
Here, s where it gets concerning. Microsoft has openly admitted they were helping build the governance model for global AI.
Not elected officials, not constitutional scholars. A corporation with direct financial interests in AI deployment, is crafting the very rules that should be regulating them.
Think about that for a moment.
Microsoft, a company that has invested billions in open AI, is now positioned to write the global rulebook on how AI systems should be governed.
This is the definition of regulatory capture, but on a global scale we’ve never seen before.
The paper trail is clear and public.
Microsoft’s representatives have been actively participating in UN forums, providing expert input on governance frameworks and positioning themselves as essential partners in the process.
This isn’t happening in smoke filled rooms.
It’s happening in plain sight because they re-confident no one is paying attention. But it gets worse.
The UNS inter agency working group on AI led by UNESCO and the ITU released a white paper that essentially creates a blueprint for super national control of AI systems.
This isn’t some vague future plan. They already implementing it through what they call the global digital compact.
The so-called independent international scientific panel on artificial intelligence is currently selecting its approximately 40 members.
Pay attention to this part. Who do you think is providing recommendations for panel membership?
The same tech companies whose products and services will be subject to the panel s oversight. This is like allowing tobacco companies to select the scientists who determine whether
cigarettes cause cancer.
The conflict of interest couldn’t be more obvious.
Yet, it’s being presented as a legitimate independent process. And here as the truly disturbing part that connects it all.
While the UN claims these frameworks will prevent relying on the benevolence of a handful of technology companies, the reality is exactly the opposite. (Time of the biblical Beast)JK
These same companies are the primary stakeholders providing input on how the governance should work.
Let me give you a specific example. The UN resolution emphasizes the need to shape incentives globally for AI development.
That innocuous sounding phrase masks a profound shift in power. It means creating a global regulatory framework that will determine which AI technologies get developed, how they redeployed, and who benefits financially. And guess who has helping shape those incentives?
The very companies that stand to profit from them. Now, watch how this connects to something even more concerning. Many of these tech companies have deep documented relationships with intelligence agencies.
Microsoft, for instance, has numerous contracts with the US Department of Defense and intelligence community.
Google s origins are connected to DARPA funding. And Palanteer, a company few Americans know about, was literally founded with CIA investment through INQL.
What does this mean? It means the same companies helping craft global AI governance are simultaneously building surveillance infrastructure for intelligence agencies.
They recreating the systems that collect your data, analyze your behavior, and potentially flag you as a person of interest, all while writing the rules about how those very systems should be regulated.
This isn’t conspiracy theory. This is documented fact.
In public statements, UN Secretary General Anne Gutirez has explicitly called for tech companies to participate in shaping these governance frameworks.
While simultaneously the United States government has expressed opposition to multilateral AI governance initiatives at the UN Security Council.
Why? Because they already have their own partnerships with these same tech giants. The connections become even clearer when you follow the money.
Open AAI, for example, received massive investment from Microsoft, $13 billion at last count.
Microsoft, in turn, has extensive government contracts. The line between private enterprise, government intelligence, and now global governance
has never been blurrier.
Here, s where things get really interesting and deeply troubling. One of the key aspects of AI governance involves content, moderation, and what they euphemistically call information integrity.
In plain English, this means determining what speech is acceptable online and what should be suppressed.
The frameworks being developed right now include provisions for AI systems to identify and flag misinformation and harmful content.
But who defines what qualifies? Under these new governance structures, that power increasingly lies with unelected tech executives and international bureaucrats.
We’ve already seen how this works on platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Content that challenges official narratives gets downranked, demonetized, or outright removed.
Now imagine that same censorship regime but codified into international governance frameworks empowered by increasingly sophisticated AI systems.
This is the real endgame. A global system of information control where algorithms determine what you re-allowed to see, say, and think.
And it’s being built right now under the guise of responsible AI governance.
But the control mechanisms don te- stop at censorship.
Another crucial component of this agenda is the push for digital identity systems, something Whitney Webb has documented extensively.
The UN sustainable development goals explicitly call for providing legal identity for all by 2030 16.9 Sudin pounds.
This sounds benevolent, but in practice it means creating global digital ID systems that can track and monitor individuals across platforms and borders.
Now connect this to AI governance. The same frameworks being developed to govern AI will inevitably interface with these digital ID systems, creating unprecedented capabilities for surveillance and control.
Your digital identity will become the gateway through which AI systems evaluate your trustworthiness, compliance, and access to services. Microsoft again is at the center of this web. Through initiatives like ID 2020, they’ve been actively developing digital identity technologies.
Now they were helping shape the governance frameworks that will determine how these systems interact with AI.
The conflict of interest should be obvious to anyone paying attention.
The third piece of this puzzle involves digital currencies and financial control.
Central bank digital currencies, CBDC’s are being developed by countries around the world with international organizations like the Bank for International Settlements providing
coordination.
These digital currencies will provide unprecedented capabilities for financial surveillance and control.
Unlike cash, every transaction can be monitored, analyzed, and potentially blocked. And who is developing the technical infrastructure for many of these systems? The same tech companies
involved in AI governance.
The connections between AI governance, digital ID, and digital currencies create the potential for a system of total control unlike anything in human history.
Your online speech monitored by AI, your identity tracked across platforms, and your financial transactions subject to algorithmic approval, all governed by frameworks developed by the very companies building these systems.
So, what does this mean for you personally? It means decisions about what AI systems can know about you, what they can predict about your behavior, and what content they can show or hide from you are being made by unelected corporate executives and bureaucrats behind closed doors in New York and Geneva.
The systems being designed right now will determine whether AI becomes a tool for human flourishing or a weapon of unprecedented control.
And the people making these decisions have clear financial incentives to expand AI capabilities with minimal restrictions.
Think about your daily life. You wake up, check your phone, use search engines, communicate on social platforms, make purchases online, and navigate with GPS.
Each of these activities generates data that feeds AI systems. Under the governance frameworks being developed, those AI systems will increasingly determine what
information you can access, what products you can buy, and potentially even where you can go.
For Americans especially, this represents a profound threat to constitutional liberties.
The first amendment protects free speech from government restriction. But what happens when speech is restricted by AI systems operating under global governance frameworks?
The fourth amendment protects against unreasonable searches. But what about AI systems that continuously analyze your digital footprint?
These constitutional protections risk becoming meaningless in a world where governance happens at the super national level.
The timeline for implementation is accelerating. The call for nominations to the independent international scientific panel on AI runs until October 31st, 2025.
After that, the panel will begin its work in earnest developing assessments and recommendations that will shape global AI governance for decades to come.
Meanwhile, the annual global dialogue on AI governance will create a forum where these governance frameworks can be continuously refined and expanded.
The infrastructure for global control is being built piece by piece in full view but with minimal public understanding or scrutiny.
What s particularly concerning is how this agenda transcends traditional political divides.
Whether Democrats or Republicans control the White House or Congress, these international governance frameworks continue to develop.
The real power increasingly lies not with elected officials but with the technocratic elite who move seamlessly between corporate boardrooms, government agencies, and international organizations.
This is why traditional political solutions are increasingly ineffective.
Voting for a different party onet address a system of control that operates above the level of national governments.
The real battle lines are being drawn between those who believe in national sovereignty, individual liberty, and democratic accountability and those pushing for global governance by unelected technocrats.
So what can you do? First, become informed. Understand the connections between AI governance, digital ID, and financial control systems.
Follow the work of researchers like Whitney Webb who have been documenting these developments for years. Second, demand transparency and accountability.
These governance frameworks are being developed with minimal public input or scrutiny.
Contact your representatives and demand they assert national sovereignty over these critical issues.
Third, support alternative technologies and platforms that prioritize privacy, free speech, and user control.
The technological infrastructure being built is not inevitable. Alternatives exist and need support to flourish.
Finally, share this information with others. The strength of this agenda lies in its obscurity.
Most people have no idea these governance frameworks are being developed or what they mean for individual liberty.
By spreading awareness, you help build the resistance. Ask yourself, who benefits from global AI governance being handed to the very companies developing the technology?
Who is looking out for your privacy, your autonomy, and your freedom in these discussions?
The question isn’t t if this will affect you as how soon.
And by the time most people realize what has happened, these governance structures will already be firmly established.
This is the quiet revolution no one is talking about and distracted off.
But we all need to start paying attention before it says too late.
The UNSAI governance framework represents one of the most significant transfers of power in modern history from democratically elected governments to unaccountable corporations and international bureaucrats.
It creates the infrastructure for unprecedented surveillance, censorship, and control.
And it’s happening right now while the world is distracted by more immediate concerns.
I have shown you the connections between tech companies, intelligence agencies, and international organizations.
I’ve documented how the same corporations developing AI technologies are helping write the rules that should be regulating them.
NIV explained how these governance frameworks connect to broader agendas involving digital identity and financial control.
This isn’t t about politics as usual.
It’s about power, who has it, how they were using it, and what it means for your future freedom.
The technological systems being built today, governed by frameworks being written right now, will shape society for generations to come.
The choice before us is clear.
Will we allow unelected technocrats to create a global system of digital control? Or will we reassert the principles of national sovereignty, constitutional liberty, and democratic accountability?
The window for action is closing. The governance frameworks are being finalized. The technologies are being deployed. And once this system is fully operational, dismantling it will be nearly impossible.
This is the defining struggle of our time. And how it ends will determine whether digital technology serves humanity or enslaves it.
