“Don’t Be Fooled — They’re Turning FOOD Into a Weapon…” Whitney Webb
Inner Conspiracy
5.612 weergaven 27 okt 2025
Have you noticed how quickly they’re trying to change what’s on your dinner plate? While everyone was distracted by election chaos and global conflicts, something far more insidious has been
taking shape… the complete corporate takeover of our food system. I’m going to show you something that should disturb every single American who values their freedom to choose what
they eat.
Transcript
Have you noticed how quickly they were trying to change what’s on your dinner plate?
While everyone was distracted by election chaos and global conflicts, something far more insidious has been taking shape.
The complete corporate takeover of our food system. I’m going to show you something that should disturb every single American who values their freedom to choose what they eat.
Let me break this down for you. What we re-witnessing isn’t he just a shift in food trends. It’s a calculated power grab by financial elites and tech billionaires who have realized something crucial.
Whoever controls the food supply controls everything.
In 2020, while most Americans were locked down in their homes, Bill Gates quietly became the largest private farmland owner in the United States. Think about that for a second. The tech billionaire who wants to dim the sun and put vaccines in everything now owns over 269,000 acres of American farmland.
But it gets worse. Gates isn’t he just buying land. He’s also the primary investor in companies like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods.
The same man buying up real farms is simultaneously funding the synthetic meat industry that could put traditional farmers out of business.
Strategy
But here where things get really interesting. In 2019, a company called Indigo Agriculture launched what they called the Teraton Initiative, the world’s first large-scale carbon farming marketplace.
Sounds environmentally friendly, right? Let me explain what’s really happening here. These carbon credit systems require farmers to completely change how they farm using proprietary technology to measure and report their carbon sequestration.
The technology and verification systems are owned by you, guessed it, the same
corporate interests pushing synthetic foods. And who is backing these carbon
farming initiatives? BlackRock and Vanguard, the world’s s largest asset
management firms that together control over 15 trillion.
These aren’t just random investments. They recreating an entirely new financial system based on controlling how food is produced.
Now, watch how this connects. In January 2021, the World Economic Forum launched
its Great Reset Initiative with a specific focus on transforming global food systems.
Their vision, a world where traditional animal agriculture is drastically reduced, replaced by lab grown proteins, and all farming is digitally monitored for climate compliance.
Pay attention to this part. The same financial institutions that own shares in these synthetic food companies are simultaneously creating the regulatory framework that will make traditional farming increasingly difficult.
They were playing both sides. By 2023, we’ve seen the roll out of food as software, where companies like Solar Foods, backed by surprise, the same venture capital firms connected to Gates, can literally create protein from air using proprietary fermentation technology.
They’ve patented food itself. This isn’t tea just about business competition.
This is about control. When your food comes from patented technology instead of nature, whoever owns those patents decides who eats.
When farming requires expensive carbon monitoring equipment and compliance with corporate design sustainability metrics, who gets pushed out?
The independent farmer.
Let us dive deeper into exactly how this system works because what I am about to
show you reveals the true scale of what they rebuilding.
First, we need to understand the concept of food as software. This isn’t te just marketing language.
It’s a fundamental reimagining of what food is. Traditional agriculture relies on natural processes refined over thousands of years.
Seeds are planted, animals are raised, harvests come in.
But the new paradigm treats food like computer code, something that can be
programmed, patented, and completely controlled by its creators.
Take Impossible Foods for example. Their key innovation isn’t tea, just plant-based
meat. It s their proprietary molecule called heem that they have patented.
They dawn tea just sell you a burger.
They sell you their intellectual property and if they decide to change the formula, increase the price or restrict who can sell it, you have no alternative source for that exact product.
This is happening across the entire alternative protein landscape.
In March 2022, the FDA granted approval to Upside Foods for lab grown chicken.
By December of that year, they had secured over $400 million in funding with
investors including Bill Gates, Richard Branson, and meat industry giant
Cargill.
See the pattern? The very companies that dominated traditional meat processing are now positioning themselves to control the synthetic alternatives.
But that’s just the food itself. The control system extends much further. In
August 2021, the Biden administration announced new initiatives to pay farmers
for carbon credits generated through climate smart farming practices.
Sounds beneficial, right? Look closer at who’s designing the measurement systems, who creating the marketplace, and who ultimately profits.
A company called Nori has created what they call the world as first carbon removal marketplace.
Their system allows farmers to sell carbon credits directly to buyers. But to participate, farmers must use Nori s proprietary measurement systems and comply with their standards.
Who funds Nori? Their investors include Placeholder, a venture firm with deep ties to cryptocurrency and digital identity systems. This is where it gets truly concerning.
The same financial interests creating these carbon markets are simultaneously investing in digital identity systems that will eventually link your personal carbon footprint to your purchasing power.
The World Economic Forum ESON white papers outline a future where individuals have personal carbon allowances that limit what they can buy based on the climate impact.
Think about what this means when applied to food.
In this system, meat becomes a luxury that counts heavily against your carbon budget.
The same people restricting your access to traditional protein sources are the ones selling you the patented alternatives. And it’s not just about what you eat at’s about who gets to farm at all.
In 2022, the Dutch government announced plans to slash nitrogen emissions by 50% by 2030, which would require eliminating about 30% of the country s livestock.
Dutch farmers who operate some of the most efficient farms in the world took to the streets in protest.
Why target them specifically? Because the Netherlands serves as a test case for what they want to implement globally.
Hear ‘s what the media didn’t tell you. In the same regions where Dutch farms were being forced to close, Bill Gates backed company Memphis meets now Upside Foods was expanding its European operations for lab grown meat production.
This isn’t coincidence at market clearing. Now let us connect this to what is happening domestically. In March 2023, the SEC proposed a rule requiring public companies to report climate related risks and greenhouse gas emissions, including emissions from their entire supply chain.
This means food producers would be required to document and report the climate impact of every farmer they work with.
Small and medium-sized farms dye have the technology or resources to comply with these complex reporting requirements.
Who does? the largest agricultural corporations and tech companies selling
carbon monitoring solutions. This creates a system where farmers must either adopt expensive proprietary technology or lose access to markets.
Meanwhile, the banking sector has begun implementing what they call climate risk
assessment in their lending practices.
JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Croup have all announced policies to
reduce financing for businesses with high carbon footprints.
When applied to agriculture, who gets squeezed out of capital access? Traditional animal agriculture and small farmers who can te afford the transition to climate smart practices.
And who’s there to buy up that land when farmers can teet loans?
Investment firms like Black Rock and wealthy individuals like Bill Gates.
This is a coordinated strategy operating through multiple pressure points.
Regulatory, financial, market, consumer, and technological.
Regulatory pressure is applied through climate policies that dictate compliance and reshape industry standards.
Financial pressure follows as banks and investors align capital with sustainability mandates, restricting access to funding for non-compliant entities.
Market pressure is reinforced through corporate supply chains that demand adherence to environmental benchmarks.
Meanwhile, consumer pressure emerges from marketing campaigns designed to influence public perception and purchasing behavior by highlighting climate impact.
Finally, technological pressure is exerted through the development and control of patented alternatives, ensuring that innovation and the profits tied to each remain in the hands of a select few.
All of these forces push in the same direction away from independent natural food production and toward corporate controlled synthetic and digitally monitored food
systems.
Let me show you how deep this goes. In September 2021, the United Nations held a food systems summit that was heavily criticized by food sovereignty groups for being dominated by corporate interests.
The summit’s concept paper was written by the world economic forum and emphasized
technological solutions precision agriculture and alternative proteins exactly the agenda that benefits the corporate food tech sector.
One of the summit’s key initiatives was the innovation lever promoting technologies like artificial intelligence, blockchain and biotechnology and food production.
And who was appointed to lead this innovation network? an executive with direct ties to the Gates Foundation.
The same pattern appears in the funding of agricultural research. Public university
research increasingly depends on private funding with corporations and billionaire philanthropists directing research priorities.
The Gates Foundation alone has granted over DAE6 billion to agricultural development, steering research toward technological solutions that align with their
investment portfolio.
This is indeed just about money at us about narrative control.
The same interests investing in synthetic food companies also fund media campaigns promoting their products as the solution to climate change.
They fund academic studies highlighting the environmental impact of traditional
agriculture.
They shape public perception through their enormous influence over mainstream and social media platforms.
Now, let’s look at what this means for your freedom.
When food production depends on proprietary technology, patented genetics, and
corporate controlled digital systems, your choices become limited to what
these entities decide to produce.
When climate regulations make traditional foods prohibitively expensive, your
choice to eat differently becomes meaningless if you can tea afford it.
But the control goes even deeper. The next phase involves linking food purchases to digital identity and central bank digital currencies, CBDC’s.
China is already pioneering the system where citizens have social credit scores
that can restrict their purchasing options.
The infrastructure for similar systems is being built in western countries under the guise of climate responsibility and health monitoring.
In August 2022, Mastercard launched a program that tracks the carbon footprint
of your purchases and can automatically cut off your spending when you reach
certain thresholds.
They re-partnering with various banks to integrate this into everyday credit cards. The technology exists right now to limit your meat purchases based on your weekly
carbon budget.
And here as the truly disturbing part, the same companies building these restriction systems are invested in the alternatives they’ll steer you toward when traditional options are unavailable or unaffordable.
This is why Whitney Webb s warning about food being weaponized isn’t te hyperbole.
It’s a precise description of what’s happening. Food is becoming a mechanism of control, a tool for social engineering, and a weapon against independence.
Think I am exaggerating? Look at Sri Lanka. In 2021, their government mandated a nationwide transition to organic farming without proper infrastructure or transition period.
The result, food production collapsed by 40%, inflation soared to 30% and the country descended into chaos.
This wasn’t t just bad policy. It was a real world test case of how quickly food systems can be weaponized to destabilize an entire nation.
The playbook is clear. create problems in the food supply through policy decisions, offer proprietary solutions owned by corporate interests, and use the crisis to restructure the system in ways that centralize control.
So, what can you do about this? First, understand that this isn’t inevitable.
These systems require your participation. They require farmers to adopt their
technology, consumers to accept their products, and citizens to comply with
their regulations.
Support local farmers directly. Build relationships with food producers in your community. Learn basic growing skills yourself. These acts of independence are becoming revolutionary in a world pushing towards centralized food control.
Pay attention to the regulatory environment. When you hear terms like climate smart agriculture, food system transformation, or sustainable food systems, look past the benevolent language to see who benefits from the proposed changes.
Most importantly, recognize that this issue transcends traditional political
divisions. This isn’t t about left versus right. It asks about centralized
control versus distributed independence.
It asks about whether you believe food production should be controlled by a
small group of corporations and financial institutions or remain in the hands of diverse independent producers.
The stakes couldn’t he be higher? Throughout human history, controlling food has been the ultimate form of power.
Those who control food can control populations, crush descent, and reshape societies according to their vision.
What we re-witnessing is the biggest power grab over the food supply in human history.
Disguised as progress towards sustainability. They were not just changing what you eat.
They were fundamentally altering who has power over your most basic human need.
The question is in tea if this will affect you and your family.
It as when and by then the alternatives may have already disappeared.
This isn’t tea just about food. This is about freedom. itself. And this is just what we know about publicly.