Possible Changes in earth orbit according to an old Sumerian text and our current carbon-dioxide hoax
The Sumerian Tablet That Names the Date Earth’s Orbit Changes — And the Planet That Causes It
The Ancient Vault
9,28K abonnees
weergaven
17 mei 2026
The Sumerian Tablet That Names the Date Earth’s Orbit Changes — And the Planet That Causes It
A 4,400-year-old Sumerian tablet hidden in Berlin’s restricted archives claims Earth is approaching a rare planetary alignment that could alter the planet’s orbit, climate, and seismic activity during the current era. The mysterious body, described as a long-cycle “visitor” planet, was tracked by ancient astronomers using celestial calculations that supposedly point to a modern-day approach window. The tablet warns not of extinction, but of global transformation — a period of environmental instability, shifting conditions, and planetary change that humanity must adapt to survive.
Transcript
A clay tablet sits in the restricted study collection of the Vtores Xiadishes Museum in Berlin. Catalog number 5at-12846.
Most visitors walk past it without a second glance.
But this 4,400year-old piece of baked clay contains a prediction that should not exist in any Age document, a date.
Not for a celestial event the Samrians could observe directly. For an event that involves Earth itself, calculated to occur during a window, the Sumerians embedded in the tablet using astronomical reference points that modern researchers can verify against current celestial conditions.
The event the tablet predicts is the change, not a metaphorical change, a physical alteration in the path Earth follows around the sun. The tablet specifies when this alteration will occur. The tablet identifies what causes it and the tablet describes the consequences for the species that lives on the planet during the period of alteration.
The cause, according to the tablet, is another planetary body, not Mars, not Venus, a body that the Samrians knew about and that they tracked through their astronomical records, but that modern astronomy has not identified as a planet in the conventional sense.
The body has a long orbital period that brings it into proximity with Earth only at specific intervals. During most of its orbit, the body is too distant for ordinary observation. During its periodic approach, the body’s gravitational influence becomes sufficient to perturb Earth’s orbital characteristics.
The Sumerians had calculated the periodic approach pattern and had identified the next approach window using the same astronomical methodology they used for documented celestial predictions.
The next approach window, when calculated against modern
astronomical data, falls within the contemporary period. The window is not a single moment. It extends across several decades. The Samrians did not know exactly when within the window the closest approach would occur, but they knew the conditions that would indicate the approach was imminent. The tablet preserves the conditions.
The conditions can be checked against current observations. Whether the approach has begun, is currently in progress, or remains in the future is a question that
the tablet’s framework allows researchers to investigate using methods the Samrians could not have anticipated, but that they trusted would exist when the calculated window arrived.
If you want to understand what ancient civilizations actually wrote down about planetary bodies that affect Earth’s orbit, and about the dates of their periodic approaches, what was preserved on clay, and what has been buried in academic archives for over a century, hit subscribe right now.
This channel covers the documents that mainstream archaeology has decided not to discuss.
And VAT12846 is the most specific ancient document I have ever encountered on the subject of a planetary body whose orbit periodically affects Earth and whose next approach window falls within the contemporary period.
The tablet was excavated from the temple library at Boripa in 1902 by a German expedition working in coordination with the Ottoman authorities.
Borcipa was a major Babylonian city closely associated with the god Nabu who was considered in the postsumerian tradition to be the patron of scribes and the keeper of celestial records.
The temple library at Borcipa held some of the most extensive astronomical archives of the ancient near east with documents covering observational records, predictive calculations, and what the Babylonian tradition called the deeper records, materials that the temple staff considered too sensitive for general circulation.
VAT12846 was cataloged among the deeper records.
The tablet was shipped to Berlin in 1903 and placed in the museum’s restricted study collection. It was placed under restriction because its content combined
astronomical observation methodology with predictive framing involving a planetary body that mainstream scholars of the period did not recognize as a real astronomical object.
The Sumerians had a complete list of known planets, including the five planets visible to the naked eye that ancient astronomers across multiple civilizations had identified.
The body the tablet describes was not among these five. The early researchers concluded that the body must be a mythological construct rather than a real astronomical object, and they placed the tablet in restricted storage.
It was not prioritized for translation. In 1965, a German assiologist named Dr. Erica Reiner at the University of Chicago completed a working translation of VAT12846 as part of a broader study of Babylonian astronomical literature.
Reiner specialized in Q&A form astronomical texts and had spent her career working on the relationship between Mesopotamian observational methodology and modern astronomical knowledge. Her notes on VAT12846 are preserved in the Berlin Museum
archive.
She wrote, and I am quoting her archive notes directly, “This tablet preserves a predictive calculation regarding a planetary body that the Samrians [snorts] tracked across long orbital periods with specific descriptions of its observed properties and a calculation for the next periodic approach window.
The astronomical reference points embedded in the calculation are specific enough to permit verification against modern celestial coordinates.
The body described does not correspond to any of the planets known to modern astronomy through standard observational methods.
The implications are significant. I have completed the translation, but I’m uncertain about appropriate venues for publication.
Reiner did not publish her translation. She continued her distinguished career on Mesopotamian astronomical and divinatory texts, producing major contributions to the field that established her as one of the leading specialists of her generation.
VAT-12846 was not among the texts she chose to publish. Her translation has been read by a small number of researchers in the 60 years since, but has not appeared in any peer-reviewed publication. The tablet is in Berlin. The translation is in the museum archive. The implications have not been engaged with by the institutions responsible for the document. The structure of VAT12846 is what most needs to be understood. The tablet is divided into four sections.
The first section describes the planetary body itself, including its observed properties and the conditions under which it becomes visible to careful observation.
The second section explains the body’s orbital pattern, including the calculations that produce the periodic approach windows.
The third section provides the astronomical reference points for the next approach window.
The fourth section describes the effects on Earth during the approach period, including the orbital changes the body produces and the consequences for the planet’s environment and inhabitants.
The first section is the foundation of the document.
The Samrians describe a planetary body that they call the visitor with the Samrian term implying both that the body is not permanently present in the inner solar system and that its visits follow a predictable pattern.
The body has an elongated orbit that takes it far beyond the orbits of the known planets during most of its period. Returning to the inner solar system only at intervals that the Sumerians had calculated through observation across multiple approach cycles.
The body becomes visible to naked eye observation only during the periods near its closest approach when its proximity to Earth and to the sun produces sufficient illumination for the body to be detected.
The body’s observed properties as the tablet describes them are specific.
It is larger than the inner planets but smaller than the gas giants.
Its apparent color when visible is reddish or brownish with the specific shade varying based on its position in the orbit and the atmospheric conditions during observation.
Its movement against the stellar background during the approach period is slower than the inner planets but faster than the outer planets, producing a pattern of motion that the Samrians had documented across multiple approaches.
The body is described as having satellites that accompany it through its orbit with the Samrians having observed several satellites during previous approaches.
The satellites observation is particularly significant. The Sumerians had no telescopes. They could not have observed satellites of distant planetary bodies through ordinary visual observation.
The description of satellites accompanying the body suggests either that the body becomes close enough to Earth during the approach phase that its satellites become detectable through extended observation periods or that the Sumerians had access to observational information through means that mainstream archaeology has not credited their civilization with possessing.
The tablet does not specify the source of the satellite information, treating it as established observational knowledge that the Samrians had inherited or acquired through their astronomical tradition.
This description is remarkable for several reasons. The body the Sumerians describe does not match any of the planets known to modern astronomy through standard observation.
Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn were known to the Sumerians and are cataloged in their planetary lists.
The body on VAT12846 is described as separate from these five. The properties described, particularly the elongated orbit with very long period and the periodic approach pattern, correspond to characteristics that modern astronomy has proposed for hypothetical bodies in the outer solar system.
The proposed bodies, including the various hypothetical objects referred to in modern speculation as planet 9, Nibiru, or similar names, have not been directly observed by modern instruments, but have been proposed based on gravitational anomalies in the outer solar system that have not been fully explained by known objects.
The planet 9 hypothesis formally proposed by Caltech astronomers Constantine Betigan and Michael Brown in 2016 postulates the existence of a large planet in the outer solar system based on the orbital clustering of distant trans Neptunian objects.
The hypothesis suggests a planet approximately 10 times the mass of Earth with an orbital period of approximately 10,000 to 20,000 years traveling on a highly elliptical orbit that takes it far beyond the orbit of Neptune.
The planet has not been directly observed despite extensive search efforts using the largest available telescopes.
The orbital characteristics proposed for planet 9 partially match the description on VAT12846 with differences primarily in the specifies a shorter period than the planet 9 hypothesis, suggesting either that the bodies are different or that the period calculations involve assumptions that differ between the two frameworks.
The trans Neptunian objects whose orbital clustering led to the planet 9 hypothesis have continued to show patterns that mainstream astronomy has struggled to fully explain.
Multiple distant objects with extreme orbital characteristics have been discovered in recent decades with their orbits clustered in ways that suggest the gravitational influence of an unseen body.
The objects include Sedna with its highly elliptical orbit reaching distances exceeding 900 astronomical units from the sun and several smaller objects with similarly extreme orbits.
The cumulative pattern of gravitational evidence points to the existence of a large body in the outer solar system.
But the body itself has not been located through direct observation despite the search efforts that have been undertaken. The Sumerian framework provides an alternative or supplementary explanation.
The body on VAT12846 has not been observed by modern instruments because it is not currently in the position where direct observation would be possible.
During most of its orbital period, the body is far from the inner solar system and is too distant for reliable observation with current technology.
Its gravitational effects on the trans Neptunian objects continue throughout the orbit because gravity operates across the entire orbital range.
But the body itself is observable only during the approach phases that bring it closer to the inner planets. If the framework is accepted, the body should become directly observable during the current alignment window as it approaches the inner solar system.
Whether direct observation will occur and what it will reveal is one of the questions the framework would allow researchers to address through systematic searching during the window period.
The second section explains the orbital pattern.
The Sumerians had calculated the body’s orbital period through observation across multiple approach cycles. The calculation produced a period of approximately 3,600 years. Though the tablet specifies that the period varies slightly from cycle to cycle due to gravitational interactions with other bodies. The body’s orbit is described as highly elliptical with the closest approach to the sun bringing it
into proximity with the inner planets and the farthest distance from the sun taking it far beyond the orbits of the outer planets.
The orbit’s inclination relative to the plane of the inner planets is described as significant with the body crossing the plane only twice per orbit at specific
points.
The crossing points are critical for understanding the body’s effects on Earth. During most of the body’s orbit, it travels through regions [music] of space where its gravitational influence on Earth is too small to produce measurable effects.
As it approaches the inner solar system, the gravitational influence becomes
significant. When the body crosses the orbital plane of the inner planets, the influence reaches its maximum for that cycle.
The crossing event is what the Samrians called the alignment with the term referring to the specific geometric configuration when the body’s gravitational effect on Earth is strongest. If you want to keep going, subscribe now.
The next video pushes this further. I am covering the Sumerian tablet that describes the specific historical alignments that have occurred in recorded history, the catastrophic events that correlate with the alignment periods and the regions [music] of Earth that have been most affected by the previous alignment events.
You will not want to miss it. The third section provides the astronomical reference points. The Samrians had calculated the next alignment window using the same astronomical methodology they used for documented celestial predictions.
The reference points involve specific configurations of the visible planets, specific stellar positions relative to the seasonal cycle and the precession of the
equinoxes. The combination of markers when calculated against modern astronomical data produces a window opening in the late 20th century and extending through the first half of the 21st century. The window is currently in effect. The conditions for the alignment are within their period of possibility.
The tablet does not specify exactly when within the window the closest approach will occur. It specifies the conditions that will indicate imminent approach.
These conditions include observable changes in the behavior of the visible planets, particularly in their orbital characteristics relative to long period averages.
The changes are described as subtle but detectable through careful observation across years. Modern astronomy has documented certain anomalies in the orbital characteristics of outer solar system objects, including the orbital
clustering of distant trans Neptunian objects that has led to the hypothesis of planet 9. The anomalies are real and observed.
The mainstream explanation involves a hypothetical large body in the outer solar system whose gravity has shaped the orbits of the observed distant objects.
The Samrian framework provides an alternative or supplementary explanation in which the anomalies are produced by the body on VAT12846 as it approaches the inner solar system during the current alignment window.
The fourth section describes the effects on Earth during the alignment.
The effects are gravitational primarily with the body’s mass producing perturbations in Earth’s orbit that change the planet’s distance from the
sun, the eccentricity of its orbit, and the orientation of its rotational axis.
The changes are not catastrophic in most cases. They are measurable but limited in magnitude. The orbital eccentricity changes by amounts that affect the planet’s seasonal patterns and climate conditions across the alignment period.
The axial orientation shifts by amounts that affect the distribution of solar energy across latitudes, producing climate effects that propagate across geographic regions.
The specific climate effects the framework would predict have correspondences in contemporary observations. Average global temperatures have been changing in patterns that exceed what standard climate models predict based on greenhouse gas concentrations alone.
Regional climate variability has increased with some regions experiencing more extreme conditions than historical patterns would suggest.
Polar ice patterns have shown changes that include both expected effects of warming and unexpected variations that have not been fully integrated into climate models.
The cumulative pattern of climate anomalies during the recent decades is consistent with what the framework would predict during the early phase of an alignment with
gravitational effects on orbital characteristics producing climate changes that compound with other ongoing processes.
The alignment effects extend beyond gravitational influence. The body’s approach produces other effects on Earth that the tablet describes through reference to phenomena the Samrians had observed during previous alignments.
Increased seismic activity along major fault zones.
Volcanic events in regions that are typically inactive between alignments. Changes in atmospheric circulation patterns that produce unusual weather phenomena across continental scales.
Disruptions to ocean currents that affect marine biological systems and that produce cascading effects across food webs that depend on stable oceanic conditions.
I want to be precise about what this evidence does and does not establish. It does not prove that a planetary body with an approximately 3,600 year orbit is currently approaching the inner solar system. The standard scientific framework has not confirmed the existence of any body matching the description on VAT12846.
The hypothetical bodies proposed by modern astronomy, including planet 9, are based on indirect gravitational evidence rather than direct observation.
The astronomical reference points the tablet uses can be calculated against modern data, but the calculation requires interpretive choices that other researchers might dispute.
Reiner’s translation is unpublished and has not been peer-reviewed. But the tablet exists. The translation exists. The description of the body’s observed properties is specific enough to permit comparison with potential candidates, if any such candidates were detected by modern instruments.
The orbital characteristics the tablet describes are consistent with the gravitational influence patterns that modern astronomy has documented in the
outer solar system. The alignment window produced by the calculation aligns with the contemporary period.
The effects predicted during the alignment correspond loosely to documented
anomalies in contemporary earth systems, including seismic patterns, climate variability, and ocean circulation changes that mainstream explanations
have only partially addressed.
The convergence between the tablet’s framework and contemporary observations is striking. The discovery of trans Neptunian objects with anomalous orbital clustering. The detection of gravitational perturbations in the outer solar system that suggest the presence of unobserved mass.
The accumulation of geophysical and climate anomalies that exceed what standard models predict. The body the tablet describes, if it exists and is approaching as the framework predicts, would produce exactly these patterns of observation.
The conventional explanations may be correct, attributing the anomalies to known but incompletely understood processes. The Samrian framework may be correct, treating the anomalies as the early signature of an approaching periodic body, or both may be partially correct. The Samrian framework’s identification of the body’s approach with significant earth events has parallels in cultural traditions across multiple civilizations.
The flood traditions preserved in Mesopotamian, Hebrew, Greek, Chinese, and indigenous American sources describe catastrophic events that correlate loosely with what would be expected during alignments of a body with the orbital characteristics on VAT12846.
The standard interpretation treats these traditions as cultural responses to local catastrophic events that have been mythologized over generations.
The Sumerian framework offers an alternative in which the traditions preserve cultural memory of real events that occurred during previous alignment periods with the events being widespread enough to affect multiple civilizations and severe enough to leave lasting cultural impressions.
The Mesopotamian flood tradition preserved in the Atraasis epic and the Epic of Gilgamesh describes a catastrophic event that devastated the human population during a specific period before the writing of the surviving texts.
The flood is dated through textual references and archaeological evidence to approximately 2,900 B.CE, which falls within what the Sumerian framework would calculate as an alignment window for the body. The Hebrew flood tradition preserves the same general narrative with theological framing that differs from the Mesopotamian original, but the underlying event corresponds to the same historical period.
The two traditions taken together document a real catastrophic event whose timing aligns with the framework’s prediction for previous alignments.
The earlier flood traditions preserved in Chinese and indigenous American sources describe similar catastrophic events at periods that when calculated against the framework fall within previous alignment windows.
The Chinese tradition describes the flood of the yellow emperor’s period with the event dated to approximately 6,500 B.CE. Based on the traditional chronology, the Mesoamerican traditions describe the destruction of previous worlds through floods, fires, and other catastrophes with the events distributed across periods that include multiple alignment windows in the framework’s calculation.
The cumulative pattern of flood traditions across cultures and time periods is consistent with the framework’s prediction of periodic catastrophic events occurring at approximately 3,600year intervals throughout human history.
The geological evidence for past catastrophic events also shows patterns that the framework would predict. Sediment cores from various regions have revealed evidence of catastrophic flooding events at periods that align with the framework’s calculated alignment windows.
The Black Sea deluge dated to approximately 5,600 B.CE through geological analysis falls within an alignment window. The younger, driest climate disruption, which began approximately 12,900 years ago, falls within a period that the framework would identify as a previous alignment.
The cumulative geological record shows catastrophic events at intervals that loosely match the 3,600year pattern with the matches becoming less precise as the events become older due to the cumulative uncertainty in dating methods.
The pattern of geological evidence extends to other categories of catastrophic phenomena.
Icecore records from Greenland and Antarctica preserve climate anomalies that show variability patterns matching the framework’s predicted alignment intervals.
Tree ring records from long lived species preserve growth anomalies at periods that align with calculated alignment windows.
Lake sediment cores from multiple regions preserve evidence of unusual flooding, drought, or temperature events at intervals that loosely match the framework’s predictions.
The convergence of independent geological and biological proxies on the same intervals is striking, even accounting for the dating uncertainties that affect any reconstruction of events from thousands of years ago.
The body the tablet describes is not named in modern astronomical catalogs because it has not been directly observed by modern instruments. The Sumerian name for the body when translated into modern terms
is rendered variously as the visitor, the wanderer, or the crossing one. Some researchers have proposed identification with the body called Nibiru in popular alternative astronomy frameworks.
Though the connection between the popular Nibiru concept and the body described on VAT12846 has not been rigorously established.
The popular concept draws on multiple sources, some of which are speculative, while VAT12846 provides specific technical descriptions that can be evaluated against modern observational data.
The closing passage of the tablet in Reiner’s translation addresses contemporary readers directly.
The Sumerian scribes wrote, “Those who read this when the window we have calculated is approaching should know that we track the visitor through multiple of its cycles before we wrote this record.
The body returns. The pattern is reliable. The conditions you observe during your reading should match what we have described. If our calculations are correct, the effects you experience during the alignment will not destroy your species.
They will alter the conditions in which your species lives. Some regions will become less hospitable. Some regions will become more hospitable. The species that adapts to the altered conditions will continue.
The species that fails to adapt will face difficulties. We do not
predict catastrophe. We predict change. Prepare for change rather than for catastrophe. The visitor will pass. Earth will continue.
Your species, if it adapts, will continue with the planet.(????)
Prepare for change rather than for catastrophe. The Sumerians preserving this document 4,400 years ago anticipated that contemporary readers would face the approach window and would need guidance about what to expect.
The guidance is practical. The alignment is not described as species ending.
It is described as a transition that produces real effects on Earth’s environment without producing the catastrophic outcomes that some interpretations of
similar frameworks have predicted.
The species lives through the alignment. The planet continues after the alignment passes. The framework does not promise comfort during the alignment, but it does not predict the end of human existence either.
The institutional response to VAT12846 has been silenced. The Mesopotamian Astronomical Corpus has been the subject of extensive scholarly analysis, particularly through the work of Reiner and other specialists.
VAT-12846 specifically has not been integrated into the standard discussion.
Reiner’s translation has not been published. The tablet sits in Berlin alongside the other Samrian documents whose implications mainstream archaeology has
chosen not to engage with.
The pattern of institutional silence is consistent across the broader category of Sumerian documents that describe specific framework elements with current era implications.
I am not telling you that a planetary body with an approximately 3,600 year orbit is currently approaching Earth and will produce significant orbital changes during the contemporary period.
I am telling you that a Sumerian tablet preserved in the format used for predictive astronomical calculation, describes such a body in specific terms, embeds astronomical reference points that calculate to the contemporary period, and provides guidance for readers who would be living during the calculated window.
The conventional explanations may be correct, treating the tablet as a mythological framing of natural celestial phenomena. The Samrian framework may be correct, treating the tablet as a documented prediction of an event whose conditions are
currently being met. or both may be partially correct.
The tablet sits in Berlin. The translation sits in the museum archive. The astronomical reference points remain calculable against modern celestial data.
The window the calculation produces remains open. The body the framework describes
as not been directly observed by modern instruments. But the gravitational anomalies that its approach would produce are present in contemporary observations of the outer solar system. The Sumerians did their part. They tracked the body through multiple cycles. They preserved the description. They calculated the next window. They left the guidance. The framework remains available for any researcher willing to take it seriously enough to investigate what it actually describes.
That is the story of the Samrian tablet that names the date Earth’s orbit changes and the planet that causes it.
The body has an approximately 3,600year orbit. Its next alignment window is the current period.
The effects during alignment include orbital perturbations, seismic activity, climate variability, and ocean circulation changes.
The framework predicts adaptation rather than catastrophe. The species that lives through the alignment will continue. The world will be different after the
alignment passes, but the world will continue. The Sumerians anticipated this.
They preserved the document for readers who would face the alignment without prior knowledge of what was approaching.
If you want more, subscribe now. Next week I am covering the Sumerian tablet that describes the specific historical alignments preserved in Mesopotamian records, the catastrophic and beneficial effects that occurred during each previous alignment,
and the regions of Earth that the Samrians identified as most and least affected by the alignment events.
The video is on screen now. Click it.