No need for digital currencies in the West?

https://concoda.substack.com/p/the-west-doesnt-need-cbdcs?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNDc1NDg1MSwicG9zdF9pZCI6ODA4Mjk0NzYsImlhdCI6MTY2NzIxNDU0NiwiZXhwIjoxNjY5ODA2NTQ2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzg5MiIsInN1YiI6InBvc3QtcmVhY3Rpb24ifQ.Cl6B1TPBA5FXT13ll9yRaVgQheGRv4ObephylqkrhmU&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

The West Doesn’t Need CBDCs

Only autocracies benefit from fully-fledged central bank digital currencies. I did copy the above article from Concoda because of its content which to me explains a lot.

There is no need to go all digital because we are already close to it. The all-digital has nothing to do with any need or greater good but other than grabbing absolute control.

Behind it are the cabal/banks (Private owned and no external oversight including governments). Money created from thin air! In that case even possible hijacked / malfunction which capacity by the so-called fraudsters have been already proven/demonstrated. See and have a look at what is going on in the Ukraine. Electricity/water/services, nothing is safe in a concentrated form. No discussion, no transparency, a dictate by the big Central banks. However, pushed, pushed, pushed and pushed using the big media they own/control. To name a few, IMF, World Bank, Central Reserve US all privately owned and no oversight/control by governments, no say it either. Have no illusion these big banks are not after money because they can already create that out of nothing but you and me. Own everything including our bodies, children, thought, blood and organs. Everything including our so-called freewill. The great reset & own nothing and be happy?

Private banks & politics
UBER

Concoda

6 hr ago

174

After the hasty departure of former prime minister Liz Truss, the UK’s position as a crypto-friendly nation suddenly came under threat. But now that Rishi Sunak, only half-jokingly described in the media as a “crypto-bro”, has taken over, the new PM has reignited the hopes of advocates who wanted to turn Britain into a global “crypto hub”.

Sunak will now purportedly attempt to fulfill the promises he laid out as chancellor back in April this year. These include introducing a “financial market infrastructure sandbox,” establishing a “Cryptoasset Engagement Group,” and enabling stablecoins — digital tokens equalling one unit of fiat currency — to be used “as a recognized form of payment.” The end goal of all this would be to uphold Britain’s status as the global leader in financial innovation.

The UK has a history of being a pioneer in “financial creativity”. In the mid-1950s, a British bank called Midland created one of the first “Eurodollar” trades, a form of financial arbitrage that sought to profit from sending US dollars overseas to bypass regulators. Midland used Eurodollars to circumvent the UK government’s capital controls on Pound Sterling, and this eventually morphed into a shadow currency system that facilitated most global finance and trade. Crypto is simply the modern-day iteration of “regulatory arbitrage”, though it likely won’t be able to outdo the might of the Eurodollar today.

And neither will “Britcoin,” the unofficial moniker for the UK’s proposed central bank digital currency (CBDC). As searches worldwide for “CBDC” have skyrocketed to over eight times the average volume since last month, it’s likely Sunak’s favorable position on CBDCs will come under increased scrutiny over the next few weeks.

Central bank digital currencies tend to be thrown into the same basket as cryptocurrencies, even though they possess no concrete association whatsoever. Having released research stating that the two are distinct, the UK government agrees. It does not appear to be using any crypto-related technologies to construct Britcoin.

That is also if Britain ever decides to start building it. As with crypto narratives such as Web3, the UK’s end goal of building and implementing a CBDC remains slightly vague and unclear. In fact, efforts to arrive at a precise use for CBDCs from other developed nations have ended with press releases stating they’re “investigating”, “looking at what it might mean” or issuing a recommendation to conduct more research.

Other than a way to implement absent payments infrastructure — like Jamaica’s CBDC will accomplish — there’s no concrete benefit to deploying a central bank digital currency in developed nations, especially ones like the UK that already possess world-class infrastructure.

This raises an important question: after much indecision, why is a stable(ish) democracy such as Britain pursuing a CBDC? The fact that China remains the only country to implement a fully-fledged version — codename “DC/EP” — suggests that the only “innovative” uses for CBDCs could be to help autocracies limit privacy and freedoms. As soon as the majority of UK citizens realize this, Rishi Sunak’s positive stance on CBDCs may come back to bite him.

One thought on “No need for digital currencies in the West?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *