{"id":6412,"date":"2024-06-19T08:30:59","date_gmt":"2024-06-19T08:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/?p=6412"},"modified":"2024-09-08T13:10:34","modified_gmt":"2024-09-08T13:10:34","slug":"1-in-a-billion-chance-covid-emerged-from-nature","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/?p=6412","title":{"rendered":"\u20181 in a billion\u2019 chance COVID emerged from nature."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n


In the 3 years of the pandemic between 2020 and 2023 there were more than 30 million excess deaths across 125 countries now we’ve been led to believe by the authorities that there’s one obvious cause for this but the authors of a brand new study call this into question.
They explicitly say that the data do not support the theory that a viral respiratory disease could account for all of those deaths so the question we’re left with what was the real cause.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This thing is 521 pages long and it was reported on extensively by Children’s Health defense now let’s look at what they found so over the 3-year period they studied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The number of excess deaths meaning more people dying over Baseline they looked at this in 35% of the global population that’s approximately 2.7 billion people so the number of excess deaths meaning people who shouldn’t have ordinarily died uh from all causes was about 31 million people so you will know
the conventional narrative however um the authors highlight some pretty large inconsistencies in that theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

First of all: one of these inconsistencies was that looking at the pattern of deaths with a viral pathogen according to the authors you would expect a gradual uh increase over time as a virus spread through a population however what they found instead was that immediately after certain countries had implemented um or declared a pandemic you saw massive spikes massive surges in deaths um this is not really to be expected what this ultimately suggests according to the authors is that the response may have actually been one of the main culprits uh rather than the pathogen itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Now another problem they found was significant variation in the rate of mortality across different places and different political jurisdictions some of which were extremely close to each other like on each other’s borders okay so just to give an example you might have two different countries bordering on one another.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

You may have two states or even two counties and each of those um implements different measures protective measures they say now um what they find is that in one of those areas the death rate is very high another oneis very low and you can’t necessarily explain that via the spread of a virus.
That’s not to say that the virus is not spreading but the fact that there’s loads of deaths in one place and not many deaths in another place when they’re so close together means that it might not be the virus that’s actually responsible for those deaths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Like they say this is not compatible with the ordinary spread of a pathogen which essentially doesn’t understand the concept of borders so according to the authors once again this is further evidence that the reason for such high death rates in certain places may not have been due to the pathogen itself but because of the measures which were put in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now to give you some examples of this let’s look at medical practices which were uh implemented for these patients one of those was intubation they were given oxygen directly into the lungs now it was shown
that giving oxygen to someone with this particular kind of condition well it’s one of the worst things that could occur CU it caused massive oxidative stress and essentially causes lungs to shut down.
And so in many cases the intubation itself which was a medical treatment was actually killing many people likewise there are certain medications which you probably all know of which were allowed in some places and banned in other places and so patients simply were not being able to have access to a medication which really worked and they were being given something else which
actually uh reduced the likelihood of survival.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now another really interesting Trend that they found was there was a high variability in deaths within each country over time so for example some places had no excess mortality for over a year and then all of a sudden they had an unexpected surge in mortality for no identifiable reason.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now with the spread of a pathogenic virus you would expect to see a gradual increase over time and then weaning down as a patient becomes um immune to that they develop immunity however um that’s not what you saw in some places and of course many of these surges in excess deaths also coincidentally uh occurred after the administration of a certain medical procedure which we all know about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n

So according to the authors all of these factors combined disprove the theory that these excess deaths were solely due to a viral respiratory disease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just to summarize the key points in this paper well as soon as some countries declared a pandemic and started implementing all of those really strict measures um they saw massive surges in mortality, other countries that didn’t do that didn’t see the same level of mortality.
Next they found massive differences in the rate of people dying um in places that were very close to each other so there would be super high deaths in one political jurisdiction and then just next door there would be very few deaths and finally as opposed to like a gradual increase over time in all of these different countries they found that there were really random surges some super high at some point and then low sometimes no deaths for over a year and that can’t be explained via the natural spread of a viral pathogen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So according to these authors all of these findings combined are basically sufficient to disprove this Theory now don’t get me wrong I’m not saying that it wasn’t a killer cuz clearly it was for some people but something is wrong here um and there are other causes so in this paper the authors argue that there
were other factors obviously responsible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Um which looking back we all know already and we can appreciate uh of everything they found they
identified two factors which were strongly associated with excess deaths one was the proportion of elderly in a community and another one was the number of people living in poverty.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now importantly they go on to say that these two groups of people are going to be the most vulnerable to external changes to society and to Medical practice so obviously old people are more likely to die but old people are also more likely to be coerced into accepting Medical Treatments that they may not necessarily know anything about.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

They may not have a wise support n work and they might not have the time or inclination or energy or brain power to be able to research any kind of in intervention.
So they are quite vulnerable think about the people who are on a low income okay they have been placed off work they’re stuck in lockdown they’re not getting paid much they can’t work from home they can’t
order food and ultimately they have to pay month by month they’re basically living pay paycheck to paycheck so many people were really struggling to make ends meet and this is a kind of underlying low-level stressor that is always going to be there for someone who is struggling to put food on the table.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

And people were put through it for years okay for years and people were isolated in their homes alone they weren’t able to see their friends they weren’t able to socialize many people lost family members and ultimately um that is a major cause for what the authors in this paper call biological stress and this
leads us to their hypothesis of the real causes of those deaths so they they’ve laid out three causes which they think could count for uh the vast number of people that did pass away during that time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

That are not likely due to a viral pathogen so first is going to be biological stress which they say
encompasses psychological stress as well this is from the mandates this is from the lockdowns all of the crazy stuff that they put people through pure evil what was done.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

The second is going to be interventions medical interventions which were not shots um but which were
uh the mechanical ventilators the incubators giving people oxygen spoke about the problem with that but also
with um drugs which were uh not very effective which sometimes worsen outcomes but which people or some people were making massive profits from a massive amount of money and so these were pushed on the population when there were more effective and safe uh drugs available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And finally the certain medical procedure that we all know about and I’ve spoken about at length but I’m not going to talk about in this video so according to these authors these three factors which were basically all avoidable which were completely unnecessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

These three factors potentially contributed to the death of over 30 million people over those 3 years now the truth is we don’t know how many of those excess deaths were because of a viral pathogen and how many were
not. However they make some very good points in this paper and they highlight that probably a really large portion of those people shouldn’t have died so if you want to learn more about this highly recommend checking out the paper and you can read uh the article which covers the basics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The COVID-19 lab-leak theory \u2014 far from being a myth or conspiracy theory \u2014 is supported by a \u201cpreponderance of evidence\u201d U.S. senators today acknowledged in a historic bipartisan hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Gary Peters, a Democratic senator from Michigan, and ranking member Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) led the two-hour committee hearing<\/a> examining the available evidence on the origins of COVID-19. CHD.TV<\/a> aired the hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Chinese government refuses to release key data from the Wuhan Institute of Virology from around the time COVID-19<\/a> emerged, making it difficult to assess the lab-leak theory and come to a conclusion.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nonetheless, much evidence points toward a lab leak rather than a natural spillover from animals, according to both expert witnesses Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.<\/a> \u2014 CEO of Atossa Therapeutics Inc. and former faculty member at Stanford University\u2019s School of Medicine \u2014 and Richard H. Ebright, Ph.D.<\/a>, professor of chemistry and chemical biology and lab director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology at Rutgers University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright is also on the leadership team of Biosafety Now<\/a>, a nongovernmental organization that \u201cadvocates for reducing numbers of high-level biocontainment laboratories and for strengthening biosafety<\/a>, biosecurity<\/a>, and biorisk management<\/a> for research on pathogens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u20181 in a billion\u2019 chance COVID emerged from nature<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quay \u2014 who began by telling the committee he was speaking \u201cas an independent scientist\u201d with no relevant financial ties \u2014 explained that the genome of SARS-CoV-2 has seven features that would be expected to be found in a virus constructed in a laboratory and which are not found in viruses from nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe statistical probability of finding each feature in nature can be determined,\u201d Quay said, \u201cand the combined probability that SARS2 came from nature is less than one in a billion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright said his extensive research and gathering of documents likewise pointed toward a lab leak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also said the \u201cgain-of-function<\/a>\u201d research on potentially dangerous pathogens \u2014 like the experiments underway at the Wuhan Institute when COVID-19 emerged \u2014 \u201chas no civilian application\u201d but is easy for researchers to do and make money doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cResearchers undertake it because it is fast,\u201d Ebright said, \u201cit is easy, it requires no specialized equipment or skills, and it was prioritized for funding and has been prioritized for publication by scientific journals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese are major incentives to researchers worldwide, in China and in the U.S.,\u201d he pointed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, gain-of-function research is largely unregulated, Ebright said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There needs to be an independent agency that oversees and regulates this risky research, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOnly after there is an acknowledgment,\u201d Ebright said, \u201cthat there is a very real possibility \u2014 not a remote possibility, but a very real possibility \u2014 of a lab origin will there be the political will to impose regulation on this scientific community that has successfully resisted and obstructed regulation for two decades.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright added, \u201cI see this acknowledgment today in a bipartisan fashion among members of this committee.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked how important it is that legislators pass a law to regulate gain-of-function research, Ebright said it\u2019s a \u201cmatter of survival.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s that important,\u201d Ebright said. \u201cThere needs to be an entity that is independent of agencies that fund research and perform research to eliminate the structural conflict of interest that has existed with current self-regulation by agencies that perform and fund research.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul said the committee will hold a hearing in the future focused on reforming gain-of-function research in the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Private comments don\u2019t match public words<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Attending committee members cited numerous instances in which federally funded researchers said one thing in private while saying something else in public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) called out Robert F. Garry, Ph.D., professor and associate dean of Tulane University\u2019s School of Medicine \u2014 who gave expert testimony during the hearing \u2014 for being part of the \u201cpropaganda efforts\u201d led by Dr. Anthony Fauci<\/a> to suppress the lab-leak theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry co-authored the \u201cProximal Origin<\/a>\u201d paper, published on March 17, 2020, in Nature Medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper \u2014 in which the authors concluded that SARS-CoV-2 was \u201cnot a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus\u201d \u2014 was used by Fauci and Dr. Francis S. Collins to \u201ctamp down\u201d the idea that a lab leak caused the COVID-19 pandemic, reported The New York Times<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Garry expressed in a private email written close to the time the paper was written that he thought it unlikely the virus had natural origins, Hawley pointed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright said he signed two petitions calling on Nature Medicine\u2019s editors to review and retract the paper<\/a> due to scientific misconduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors of the paper reported conclusions they knew at the time to be untrue. \u201cThis is the most egregious form of scientific misconduct,\u201d Ebright said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley said, \u201cPeople lost their jobs because of this. They lost their standing. They were kicked off Facebook. They were kicked off Twitter.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley asked Garry, \u201cDo you regret being part of this effort, this propaganda effort?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry said he was \u201cjust writing a paper about our scientific opinions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley asked again: \u201cDo you regret the fact that your paper was used to censor your fellow scientists? It was used to censor ordinary Americans who asked questions about the virus. Do you regret that?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry said, \u201cWhen you write a paper, I mean, you get it in the journal, we can\u2019t control what happens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley said, \u201cSo you\u2019re not responsible at all. It\u2019s amazing. Nobody who is involved in any of this is responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Later, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asked Garry how much money he had received in government grants over his career. \u201cI\u2019m not sure,\u201d said Garry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson revealed that between 2020 and 2022, Garry and Kristian Andersen, Ph.D. <\/a>\u2014 another co-author of the \u201cProximal Origin\u201d paper \u2014 received $25.2 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple U.S. agencies concluded it was a lab leak<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Garry started to explain how the intelligence community came to the same conclusion as he and his co-authors, Hawley interrupted him. \u201cThat is a lie,\u201d Hawley said. \u201cLet\u2019s stop there.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley pointed out that \u201cmultiple intelligence community agents and components\u201d have concluded the virus was likely a lab leak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Energy concluded COVID-19 came from a lab, Paul said. So did the FBI, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A CIA whistleblower revealed that the scientists convened to study the issue voted 6-1 to say it came from the lab, Paul said. \u201cThen they were overruled by superiors for political reasons.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo there\u2019s a lot of evidence that people within the intelligence agencies actually do believe that there is evidence that it came from the lab,\u201d Paul said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emily Kopp, a reporter with U.S. Right to Know, debunked more of Garry\u2019s statements in an X post<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Sen. Rand Paul opens a bipartisan hearing on COVID origins by reading the statements of virologists who privately agonized about the lab leak theory but cried \u201cconspiracy theory!\u201d publicly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He includes the statements of Bob Garry, one of those virologists, who is a witness\u2026 pic.twitter.com\/bGZQOkMjh4<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2014 Emily Kopp (@emilyakopp) June 18, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Johnson calls for unredacted copies of Fauci emails<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson held up copies of the final 50 pages of Fauci\u2019s emails<\/a> \u2014 which were heavily redacted. \u201cWe had to FOIA for these. They didn\u2019t turn these over, which they should have.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He suggested some are still looking for clear, conclusive evidence \u2014 as in a \u201csmoking gun\u201d \u2014 proving Fauci and the research he funded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were responsible for the COVID-19 virus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cMy guess is the smoking gun exists somewhere under these heavy redactions,\u201d Johnson said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson asked the chairman to issue a subpoena to get the final 50 pages unredacted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Watch here:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/boxcast.tv\/view-embed\/origins-of-covid-19-an-examination-of-available-evidence–june-18-eaolimafad39kbbqwwev<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

June 18, 2024 \u203a Agency Capture<\/a> \u203a COVID<\/a> \u203a News<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

COVID<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u20181 in a Billion\u2019 Chance COVID Emerged From Nature, Scientist Tells Lawmakers<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The COVID-19 lab-leak theory \u2014 far from being a myth or conspiracy theory \u2014 is supported by a \u201cpreponderance of evidence\u201d U.S. senators today acknowledged in a bipartisan hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

JUNE 18, 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Steven<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

2746 PAGEVIEWSREPUBLISH <\/p>\n\n\n\n

PRINTSHARE<\/p>\n\n\n\n

 18<\/a> COMMENTS<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The COVID-19 lab-leak theory \u2014 far from being a myth or conspiracy theory \u2014 is supported by a \u201cpreponderance of evidence\u201d U.S. senators today acknowledged in a historic bipartisan hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Gary Peters, a Democratic senator from Michigan, and ranking member Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) led the two-hour committee hearing<\/a> examining the available evidence on the origins of COVID-19. CHD.TV<\/a> aired the hearing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Chinese government refuses to release key data from the Wuhan Institute of Virology from around the time COVID-19<\/a> emerged, making it difficult to assess the lab-leak theory and come to a conclusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nonetheless, much evidence points toward a lab leak rather than a natural spillover from animals, according to both expert witnesses Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.<\/a> \u2014 CEO of Atossa Therapeutics Inc. and former faculty member at Stanford University\u2019s School of Medicine \u2014 and Richard H. Ebright, Ph.D.<\/a>, professor of chemistry and chemical biology and lab director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology at Rutgers University.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright is also on the leadership team of Biosafety Now<\/a>, a nongovernmental organization that \u201cadvocates for reducing numbers of high-level biocontainment laboratories and for strengthening biosafety<\/a>, biosecurity<\/a>, and biorisk management<\/a> for research on pathogens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Vaccine Safety Project<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

LEARN MORE<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u20181 in a billion\u2019 chance COVID emerged from nature<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quay \u2014 who began by telling the committee he was speaking \u201cas an independent scientist\u201d with no relevant financial ties \u2014 explained that the genome of SARS-CoV-2 has seven features that would be expected to be found in a virus constructed in a laboratory and which are not found in viruses from nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe statistical probability of finding each feature in nature can be determined,\u201d Quay said, \u201cand the combined probability that SARS2 came from nature is less than one in a billion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright said his extensive research and gathering of documents likewise pointed toward a lab leak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also said the \u201cgain-of-function<\/a>\u201d research on potentially dangerous pathogens \u2014 like the experiments underway at the Wuhan Institute when COVID-19 emerged \u2014 \u201chas no civilian application\u201d but is easy for researchers to do and make money doing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cResearchers undertake it because it is fast,\u201d Ebright said, \u201cit is easy, it requires no specialized equipment or skills, and it was prioritized for funding and has been prioritized for publication by scientific journals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese are major incentives to researchers worldwide, in China and in the U.S.,\u201d he pointed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Moreover, gain-of-function research is largely unregulated, Ebright said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There needs to be an independent agency that oversees and regulates this risky research, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOnly after there is an acknowledgment,\u201d Ebright said, \u201cthat there is a very real possibility \u2014 not a remote possibility, but a very real possibility \u2014 of a lab origin will there be the political will to impose regulation on this scientific community that has successfully resisted and obstructed regulation for two decades.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright added, \u201cI see this acknowledgment today in a bipartisan fashion among members of this committee.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked how important it is that legislators pass a law to regulate gain-of-function research, Ebright said it\u2019s a \u201cmatter of survival.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s that important,\u201d Ebright said. \u201cThere needs to be an entity that is independent of agencies that fund research and perform research to eliminate the structural conflict of interest that has existed with current self-regulation by agencies that perform and fund research.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Paul said the committee will hold a hearing in the future focused on reforming gain-of-function research in the U.S.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Magnifying<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Do you have a news tip?We want to hear from you!<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

CONTACT US<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Private comments don\u2019t match public words<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Attending committee members cited numerous instances in which federally funded researchers said one thing in private while saying something else in public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) called out Robert F. Garry, Ph.D., professor and associate dean of Tulane University\u2019s School of Medicine \u2014 who gave expert testimony during the hearing \u2014 for being part of the \u201cpropaganda efforts\u201d led by Dr. Anthony Fauci<\/a> to suppress the lab-leak theory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry co-authored the \u201cProximal Origin<\/a>\u201d paper, published on March 17, 2020, in Nature Medicine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The paper \u2014 in which the authors concluded that SARS-CoV-2 was \u201cnot a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus\u201d \u2014 was used by Fauci and Dr. Francis S. Collins to \u201ctamp down\u201d the idea that a lab leak caused the COVID-19 pandemic, reported The New York Times<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, Garry expressed in a private email written close to the time the paper was written that he thought it unlikely the virus had natural origins, Hawley pointed out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ebright said he signed two petitions calling on Nature Medicine\u2019s editors to review and retract the paper<\/a> due to scientific misconduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The authors of the paper reported conclusions they knew at the time to be untrue. \u201cThis is the most egregious form of scientific misconduct,\u201d Ebright said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley said, \u201cPeople lost their jobs because of this. They lost their standing. They were kicked off Facebook. They were kicked off Twitter.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley asked Garry, \u201cDo you regret being part of this effort, this propaganda effort?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry said he was \u201cjust writing a paper about our scientific opinions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley asked again: \u201cDo you regret the fact that your paper was used to censor your fellow scientists? It was used to censor ordinary Americans who asked questions about the virus. Do you regret that?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Garry said, \u201cWhen you write a paper, I mean, you get it in the journal, we can\u2019t control what happens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley said, \u201cSo you\u2019re not responsible at all. It\u2019s amazing. Nobody who is involved in any of this is responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Later, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asked Garry how much money he had received in government grants over his career. \u201cI\u2019m not sure,\u201d said Garry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson revealed that between 2020 and 2022, Garry and Kristian Andersen, Ph.D. <\/a>\u2014 another co-author of the \u201cProximal Origin\u201d paper \u2014 received $25.2 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won\u2019t write.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PLEASE DONATE TODAY<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Multiple U.S. agencies concluded it was a lab leak<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

When Garry started to explain how the intelligence community came to the same conclusion as he and his co-authors, Hawley interrupted him. \u201cThat is a lie,\u201d Hawley said. \u201cLet\u2019s stop there.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hawley pointed out that \u201cmultiple intelligence community agents and components\u201d have concluded the virus was likely a lab leak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Department of Energy concluded COVID-19 came from a lab, Paul said. So did the FBI, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A CIA whistleblower revealed that the scientists convened to study the issue voted 6-1 to say it came from the lab, Paul said. \u201cThen they were overruled by superiors for political reasons.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo there\u2019s a lot of evidence that people within the intelligence agencies actually do believe that there is evidence that it came from the lab,\u201d Paul said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Emily Kopp, a reporter with U.S. Right to Know, debunked more of Garry\u2019s statements in an X post<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1803085571276800187&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fchildrenshealthdefense.org%2Fdefender%2Fcovid-origins-congress-hearing-wuhan-lab-leak%2F&sessionId=9fd048ce44ad2f3a14c68af40b7b425ca3214790&siteScreenName=ChildrensHD&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson calls for unredacted copies of Fauci emails<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson held up copies of the final 50 pages of Fauci\u2019s emails<\/a> \u2014 which were heavily redacted. \u201cWe had to FOIA for these. They didn\u2019t turn these over, which they should have.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He suggested some are still looking for clear, conclusive evidence \u2014 as in a \u201csmoking gun\u201d \u2014 proving Fauci and the research he funded at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were responsible for the COVID-19 virus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cMy guess is the smoking gun exists somewhere under these heavy redactions,\u201d Johnson said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Johnson asked the chairman to issue a subpoena to get the final 50 pages unredacted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Watch here:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

https:\/\/boxcast.tv\/view-embed\/origins-of-covid-19-an-examination-of-available-evidence–june-18-eaolimafad39kbbqwwev<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Suzanne<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D., is a reporter and researcher for The Defender based in Fairfield, Iowa.REPUBLISH THIS ARTICLE<\/p>\n\n\n\n

SUGGEST A CORRECTION<\/a>SHARE ARTICLE<\/p>\n\n\n\n

———————————————————————————————————-<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Statistical analysis shows that NOBODY under 60 should take the COVID vaccine<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This is a PRELIMINARY result based on over 1,500 death reports we\u2019ve received so far. You are welcome to download our data yourself and analyze it and see if you agree. You may find some new things.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

MAY 17, 2022<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Share<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Summary<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

This is big. Really big. This may prove to be one of the most important articles I will write this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Figure 1 below is an analysis of survey data I collected. The analysis shows that the vaccines are harmful to those under 60<\/strong>. The red dots higher than the error bar means more vaccinated people observed dead than expected based on the population of vaccinated to all people. In other words, if we vaccinated 60% of people (middle of the grey bar) and 70% (red dot) of the deaths are vaccinated, we have a serious problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The precautionary principle of medicine suggests if you are under 60 and thinking of taking a vaccine, you shouldn\u2019t. These preliminary results are both statistically significant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/a>
Figure 1. Red dot below error bar = vax works. Red dot above error bar = vax likely causes harm. Red dot inside the error bar = Insufficient evidence to justify taking a new, unproven vaccine. Conclusion: Vaccine shouldn\u2019t be considered unless there is a clear benefit. 60 and older seems to justify use based on the data we have so far. Limitations: we are waiting for others to confirm \/ challenge the analysis. See text for more info. Joel Smalley did the analysis..<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

However, there could be errors in the analysis and\/or survey bias errors that will change the result, so this is preliminary. I hope to make these not preliminary in a few days.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I created a mortality survey<\/a> which asked people to report the date, age, and vaccine status of the people who died who they had the tightest relationship with. You could report as many deaths as you wanted for people you PERSONALLY knew, but if you didn\u2019t report them all, start with the person closest to you. All deaths should be reported no matter what the cause of the death<\/a>. If they died after December 1, 2020, report it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first 1,700+ results are in and Joel Smalley had time to do the analysis. It is stunning. The conclusion is very clear: nobody under 60 years old should get the vaccine<\/strong> because there is no evidence of a benefit. In fact, if you are between 40-60, it\u2019s clear that vaccination makes it more likely you\u2019ll die<\/strong>, not less likely. It\u2019s statistically significant. The result that the younger you are, the less sense it makes, is consistent with what pretty much everyone has been saying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only thing that surprised me in the analysis is that data showed that if you are 60 and older, getting vaccinated reduces your chance of dying<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m astonished by the data showing a benefit for >60 because it is inconsistent with the VAERS data (which is off the charts showing nearly 500,000 deaths), embalmer data<\/a>, and this article about 6 elderly deaths in Palo Alto out of 9 people vaccinated<\/a>, and medicare data<\/a>, and UK ONS data<\/a>. I\u2019m confident of the embalmer data and Palo Alto deaths: there is absolutely no way if the vaccine was protective that those events could occur. This means there must be an error in the analysis or confounding of the data. There cannot be two truths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My advice is to avoid the COVID vaccines for ALL ages<\/strong>. If you get sick, get early treatment. This is because we have strong DIRECT evidence<\/strong> (embalmer, nursing home data is clearly strongly negative) that the vaccines are deadly to the elderly and until someone explains how the direct evidence is wrong, the precautionary rule of medicine says we should respect that possibility and thus early treatment is the preferred alternative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In other words, if you have conflicting evidence, better to avoid that option until the conflict is resolved especially when the more direct evidence suggests that the intervention is deadly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m not trying to cherry pick here. I\u2019m saying that quality direct evidence rules over calculated numbers. If the best evidence I have is calculated numbers, I go with that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, if the calculations show that the vaccine is safe for those over 60 and I find that 9 out of 10 people over 60 who get the shot die within 24 hours from blood clots, which evidence do you believe?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I cannot reconcile the discrepancy at this time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Joel may have made a mistake. So take all these results (including under 60) with a grain of salt for now. We are getting close to finding the truth. There could be a bias that shifts everything in one direction. We\u2019ll see.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We want to have many eyes on this data before we will announce a definitive result.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m making all the data to date available for people to validate or invalidate the result. I\u2019ll periodically update the spreadsheet as we collect more data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We\u2019ll be collecting a lot more data to refine the result and employ 3 different third party survey firms as well<\/strong>. This eliminates the risk of people trying to game the survey (not that anyone would do that). So if the independent polling firm results don\u2019t match our results, we\u2019ll look for what happened. Using five or more sources of independent data (mine, Joe\u2019s, 3 polling firms, etc.) will give everyone more confidence that the results are valid.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Note that the definition of vaccinated here is \u201cgot the vaccine\u201d not \u201ctwo weeks after they got the vaccine.\u201d We are NOT using public data that is encumbered this way. Such definitions are misleading since if the vaccine kills everyone within two weeks of the shot, the vaccines look amazingly safe and not being vaccinated looks risky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Notes on Figure 1 from Joel Smalley<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Joel Smalley did the analysis of the two datasets described below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Figure 1 represents the percentage of deaths between Jan \u201921 and May \u201922 that were of vaccinated people of different age groups compared to the expected percentage of deaths.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The expected percentage was determined as a function of the vaccinated population on the day of death of a vaccinated or unvaccinated person in the dataset.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The expected value was calculated by randomly selecting a number from 1 to 100 and specifying it as vaccinated if it was at or below the vaccinated population for that age range on that day. Otherwise, it would be considered an unvaccinated death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The model was run 1,000 times and the average point estimate taken to be the expected value with a confidence interval of 2 standard deviations from the mean.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The survey<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

There were two versions of the survey<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The first one left too much wiggle room in the responses so the first 931 results need to be scrubbed to put in a consistent format to be usable. I modified the survey mid-survey so that messes things up a bit; that column needs to be normalized.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If someone would like to volunteer to do that, please note that in the comments and then email me the updated spreadsheet at stevekirsch-request (at) protonmail.com. That email is NOT monitored by me and if you send anything there other than in response to a specific request it will be ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The data<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

PostVaxMortality1<\/a>: 932 rows. Note that I changed things around mid survey, so be careful. This is the database I need someone to clean up and I\u2019ll replace it, e.g., \u201cDays after dose\u201d column was changed from fill in to choose 1. However, most of the other columns are fine so you can use them immediately. Just check the column first.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

PostVaxMortality2<\/a>: 834 rows. No need to fix the data. Use immediately<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is the CDC vaccination data<\/a> used to determine the person-years of each dose bucket (and the unvaccinated bucket) over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Technical logistics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
    \n
  1. It took me about an hour to design the survey questions and about 25 minutes to create the Google form<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  2. It took me about 20 minutes to write up a promo on substack and launch the survey<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  3. It took 24 hours to get over 1,000 responses<\/li>\n\n\n\n
  4. It took Joel 30 minutes to analyze the results<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    That\u2019s damn time efficient. Can\u2019t imagine why the CDC can\u2019t replicate this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Limitations<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
      \n
    1. Most of the respondents were my followers so can be classified as \u201canti-vaxx.\u201d However, this survey makes the case that the vaccines work for those over 60. If it was biased that people were only reporting people with vaccines who died right after, this signal would be impossible. So it\u2019s unlikely there is selection bias, but there could be. That\u2019s why we are using 3 outside survey firms for our next data collection.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Joel did the analysis very quickly and may not have adjusted for all the biases and confounders that are always present.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Nobody else has had a chance yet to replicate or refute the result on the data collected so far.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    4. Things to consider that could affect the final result include: the virus IFR changes over time, the age mix of people in the vaccinated group changes, background death rates are seasonal and differ in each age range, people may report someone who dies 13 days after Dose 1 to be unvaccinated, people who answer the survey.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    5. For the purposes of this survey, only the date, age at death, and vaccination status of the deceased matter. These can be misreported.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    6. There may be an error in the analysis.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    7. There may be errors in the public underlying data such as reporting vaccination status as vaccinated 14 days after the jab rather than at the moment of the jab.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    8. This is not a complete list.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      In short, we\u2019re getting very close to the truth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Was my sample biased?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      The survey data we use is objective, fact-based questions: date, age, got vax?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The results we got show the younger you are, the harder to justify the vaccines are. This shouldn\u2019t surprise anyone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      People don\u2019t get to chose who dies. But they could have selective recall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      However the results were consistent with other research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      In her interview with Freddie Sayers, Professor Christine Stabell Benn said her best guess on current data is that those under 50 probably don\u2019t benefit from the vaccine. She has been looking at non-specific effects of vaccines and finds the mRNA vaccines may have been associated with an overall higher mortality from non-covid related issues<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      What will happen next<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

      One of two things will happen now:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. The medical community will do their own survey and replicate the result and realize they\u2019ve been had. They will call a halt to the vaccine immediately for those under 60.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
      2. The medical community will fail to replicate the result and call me a misinformation spreader. However, this will only cause them to dig themselves even deeper into a hole because they know other independent people will be able to replicate it. There will not be a rock big enough for them to hide under.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        Will the medical community double down in the face of evidence they cannot refute? Or admit they made the biggest error of all time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Finally, it is ridiculous that nobody in the world has done a similar survey and published the results. Nothing prevented anyone from doing this. The only person that I\u2019m aware of doing this is UCSF Professor Aditi Bhargava<\/a>. I\u2019m a major funder of her work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Anyone could have done the same survey I did. It took only an hour or so to create the survey the first time and I had 1,000 results back less than 24 hours later. Why is the CDC incapable of doing this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Why isn\u2019t there a proper risk benefit analysis of these vaccines from the CDC? We have NOTHING.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        Nobody in the medical community demanded evidence of a positive risk-benefit. You can\u2019t assume that the vaccines are safe. That would be trusting a drug company who has stated, without any evidence whatsoever, that all the excess deaths in the vaccine group were not related to the vaccine. The FDA and medical community accept their word without asking for proof.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Nobody wanted to see the risk benefit analysis. Did you ever hear the VRBPAC or ACIP committee members asking for one? Of course not!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        So I did it using the VAERS data<\/a> and the UK ONS data<\/a> and here\u2019s what I found:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \"\"\/<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

        If I got it wrong, where is the CORRECT analysis of that same data? People like to throw darts at my work, but they NEVER show me the CORRECT analysis of the same data set. I wonder why that is? Some claim the VAERS data is \u201cunreliable\u201d but that\u2019s a lame excuse for not looking at. Nothing keeps you from doing a proper analysis and then having a Limitations section that notices that VAERS is underreported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Why isn\u2019t there a study that follows 100,000 unvaccinated people over time vs. 100,000 vaccinated in equally matched groups and observing how many people are alive after each week in the two groups and categorize each death as COVID or not. You\u2019d look at the benefit (decrease in # of COVID deaths compared to the unvaccinated group) and risk (increase in non-COVID all-cause mortality in the vaccinated group) and compute the ratio. That gives you a risk benefit analysis stratified by age and you can see how the risk\/benefit changes over time so people can answer the question, \u201cIf I am age xxx, does it make sense for me to be vaccinated today?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Nobody has asked for this. Why? Do we not want to know?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Any sane society should be DEMANDING such an analysis before even considering approving such a drug. Mandating a drug with no risk benefit analysis that is obviously not being done is the height of irresponsibility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Why is nobody speaking out about this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Why is it so unreasonable to ask for a risk-benefit analysis BEFORE doctors advise their patients? There is simply no excuse for not computing this from this \u201creal world\u201d mass experiment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        If we don\u2019t have the data, we need to get it before we experiment on people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        We need to stop the experiment now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Is it the responsibility of electrical engineers to check the work of the medical community?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        That this survey and analysis comes from a high tech software executive in Silicon Valley with two EECS degrees from MIT is an embarrassment. This is not my responsibility to do this. I did it because nobody in the government, medical community, no public health official, and nobody in the mainstream media did it. It\u2019s almost as if they didn\u2019t want to know that the vaccine worked or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        If the vaccines aren\u2019t protective, what can we do? Early treatment!<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

        Just like Dorothy could have always returned to Kansas just by clicking her slippers, we have had the cheapest, safest, and fastest solution to treat COVID available since March 2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Early treatment such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol<\/a> has a near perfect track record against COVID with few hospitalizations and no deaths. The NIH and mainstream doctors (who follow whatever the NIH says) ignore it. That tells you everything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        So what we should be telling people is have the drugs on-hand so you can start treatment ASAP after you get sick.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        Instead, the CDC tells people to get vaccinated and that early treatment with repurposed drugs should be ignored.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        We\u2019d be better off if everyone listened carefully to what the CDC says and does the opposite. I\u2019m serious. I can\u2019t think of anything they\u2019ve recommended that has been helpful in the pandemic. I\u2019d love to debate them on that. I could sell tickets to that one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        We never needed screening, lockdowns, social distancing, remdesivir, masks, vaccines, etc. All we needed is one thing: let people know early treatment works if given early.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        How you can help<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
          \n
        1. If you are into data analysis, have a look at the data (see \u201cThe data\u201d section above)<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        2. If you live in the UK, please take Joel\u2019s survey of deaths in the UK<\/a> so we can compare the results.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
        3. If you live anywhere else, please take my survey<\/a> if you have not already<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

          Summary<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          We now have a simple objective way to assess the safety and efficacy of a vaccine. Anyone can do the surveys themselves to verify the result. Anyone can take our data and analyze it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The analysis is troubling: nobody under 60 should take the vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          I\u2019m awaiting confirmation from other researchers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Please share this article so we can collect more data to reduce the size of the error bars. If you are not a subscriber, please subscribe so we can let you know what the subsequent analysis shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          With your help, we can change the world. Thank you!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Share<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          A summary of the evidence against the COVID vaccines<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Here\u2019s a quick summary of the key pieces of evidence that taken together show that the COVID vaccines are unsafe and that the medical community should\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JAN 7\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          1,095<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          375<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Latest<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Top<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Discussions<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Alec Zeck\u2019s claims of the \u201cend of virology\u201d are VERY seriously flawed<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          He calls it \u201cPerhaps The Most Important Work of Our Time.\u201d Hardly. It\u2019s all BAD science that proves (or disproves) absolutely nothing other than it is\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 16\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          184<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          709<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          How can millions of people, all exhibiting signs of COVID have whole genome sequences that match the SARS-CoV-2 reference genome if viruses\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Do you know? They were sequenced from scratch. The machines computed the sequences solely based on the samples under test using random primers.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 14\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          378<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          1,599<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          VSRF LIVE Tonight \u2013 I Debate Dr. Andrew Kaufman, M.D. about the Existence of the COVID 19 Virus<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Thursday, June 13th: 7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 13\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          133<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          181<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          NOBODY can explain what happened at Apple Valley Village<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Apple Valley Village Health Care center had 0% COVID death rate before the shots rolled out, but a 30% death rate from COVID **AFTER** the \u201clifesaving\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 8\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          794<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          250<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          VSRF LIVE Tonight \u2013 Live from the #ReAwaken Tour in Detroit<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Thursday, June 6th: 7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 6\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          81<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          14<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          How many kids under age 21 did the COVID vaccines kill?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          We know there were no benefits. How many kids, aged 20 and under, died from the COVID shots? PLEASE HELP ME FIND OUT.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUN 4\u2022<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          STEVE KIRSCH<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          413<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          204<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          HPV Vaccine<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The war on adolescents<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          PUBLISHED ON DR\u2019S NEWSLETTER\u2022JUN 4See all<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"Steve<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          Steve Kirsch\u2019s newsletter<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          I write about COVID mitigation policies, vaccines, corruption, censorship, and early treatments. The data shows that vaccines are ruining the health of Americans and driving the epidemic in a variety of health conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          ———————Next————————————-<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          June 17, 2024 \u203a Censorship\/Surveillance<\/a> \u203a COVID<\/a> \u203a News<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          COVID<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          \u2018Silent Epidemic\u2019: Maine Lawmakers Shrug Off 18% Increase in Excess Deaths<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

          Rep. Heidi Sampson, a Republican legislator from Maine, said the state\u2019s Democratic lawmakers \u201cshrugged their shoulders\u201d when she proposed investigating the increase in sudden deaths since 2020 among young and middle-aged adults in Maine with no known previous illness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          by John-Michael Dumais<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          JUNE 17, 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"heidi<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          9250 PAGEVIEWSREPUBLISH <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          PRINTSHARE<\/p>\n\n\n\n

           33<\/a> COMMENTS<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Rep. Heidi Sampson<\/a>, a Republican legislator from Maine, in recent months made headlines for her actions on the floor of the Maine House of Representatives<\/a>, where she presented alarming data on Maine\u2019s \u201csilent epidemic\u201d of excess deaths<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She also raised critical questions about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines<\/a> and warned against the growing influence of international organizations like the World Health Organization<\/a> (WHO).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Excess death data \u2018literally earthshaking\u2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          As the COVID-19<\/a> pandemic progressed, Sampson grew increasingly concerned about the data showing a rise in excess deaths among young and middle-aged adults in Maine<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          In March, she decided to take action. Using 2015-2022 Maine all-cause mortality<\/a> data analyzed by a statistician, she told her colleagues that Maine has since 2020 seen close to an 18% increase in excess deaths among 25- to 64-year-olds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The spike in excess deaths for 2020 was 6.3% compared to the background rate of about 1.5% from 2015-2020.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson cited the CEO of the One America insurance<\/a> company, saying he \u201cpublicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarter of 2021, death in people of working age 18 to 64 was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cThis data was compiled by actuaries who are the mathematical experts insurance companies rely upon,\u201d she said. \u201cA 40% increase in deaths is literally earthshaking. Even a 10% increase in excess deaths would have been a 1-in-200-year event.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She went on to describe the increasingly common phenomenon of \u201csudden deaths<\/a>,\u201d citing examples such as death by heart attack, stroke, meningitis, brain aneurysm, pulmonary embolism<\/a>, anaphylaxis and asthma.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She encouraged lawmakers to do their own searches. \u201cYou will find hundreds, even thousands, of examples. A few years ago, this was unheard of.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson said the newly coined term \u201csudden death syndrome (SDS)\u201d was a \u201csilent epidemic\u201d that demanded immediate attention and investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She told lawmakers:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cSDS is an umbrella term. It includes biologically based scenarios describing [the] quick onset of unexpected mortality without prior signs of illness. I\u2019ll repeat: without prior signs of illness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cAutopsies<\/a> may be non-conclusive due to the lack of obvious abnormalities. They may also be non-conclusive because we may not be asking the right questions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Citing what she called the \u201cshocking\u201d nature of the data, Sampson called for the Maine House to investigate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cIf there is even a chance this data is correct, we have the moral obligation to our children to investigate,\u201d she said. \u201cThis data represents a flashing red light.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          However, despite her efforts, Maine lawmakers swiftly rejected Sampson\u2019s joint order, along party lines. \u201cThe Democrats could not reject this order fast enough,\u201d she told The Defender<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Two Democratic lawmakers, both doctors, approached her after her speech, wanting to know where she got the data and stating they thought the increased deaths were due to suicides.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          In other discussions, Sampson said people didn\u2019t want to believe the data. She encouraged them to \u201ctrust but verify\u201d and asked why they were not doing their due diligence to investigate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cThey just shrugged their shoulders,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cWe shut the whole damn state down for 6%,\u201d she said. \u201cWhat are we doing with almost 18%? As a mother and a grandmother, this entire issue deeply concerns me. I want my children and their children to have long, healthy lives. We need to get to the bottom of this.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The Vaccine Safety Project<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          LEARN MORE<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          V-safe data \u2018a resounding alarm\u2019 on vaccine harms<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          In addition to her concerns about excess deaths, Sampson also has been a vocal advocate for vaccine safety and transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          In a separate action on the House floor on April 3, she presented alarming data from the CDC\u2019s V-safe surveillance<\/a> system, which tracks adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, and called for a ban on these vaccines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson began by explaining the significance of the V-safe data<\/a>, noting that it was collected from over 10 million people who were among the first to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cThese were excited participants, eager for this new novel vaccine,\u201d she said. \u201cThey wanted it to be safe and effective<\/a>. They believed it was a good thing, and therefore would have no incentives to make up their stories.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She revealed the shocking results of the V-safe data analysis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201c7.7%, or 782,013 people, needed medical attention. Of those 7.7%, 70% needed to be hospitalized or went to the ER or urgent care. Slightly less than 30% needed telehealth care. On average, each person needed medical attention two to three times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cAdditionally, 13% of the individuals reported they were unable to go to work or go to school, and about 12% were unable to perform normal activities.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson noted another 2.5 million people had to miss school, work or other normal activities. \u201cThis means 33% of unique individuals were affected by negative health impacts.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She also highlighted the concerning symptoms reported in the free-text entries<\/a> of the V-safe survey, including chest pains, heart palpitations, shortness of breath, tinnitus, menstrual disturbances and miscarriages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Calling these statistics \u201ca resounding alarm,\u201d Sampson asked her colleagues to halt all COVID-19 vaccinations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cThe data are in \u2014 it is not safe and effective,\u201d she said. \u201cAnd until the federal government removes the liability shield from the vaccine manufacturers, the COVID-19 shot must be removed from the Maine market.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson told the Defender she once again faced resistance from her colleagues. She described their response as tense and uncomfortable, with many refusing to engage in further discussion or consider the implications of the V-safe data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Did DOJ Lawyers Commit Fraud in the Omnibus Autism Proceeding?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          LEARN MORE<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Pushback against WHO agenda<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          As the end of Sampson\u2019s eight-year term limit approaches, she has turned her attention to the WHO agenda<\/a> and its potential effect on Maine\u2019s sovereignty and self-determination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          On April 11, she warned her Maine House colleagues about the WHO\u2019s proposed pandemic treaty and amendments<\/a> to the International Health Regulations, arguing that they would grant the organization sweeping powers to dictate public health policies at the expense of individual states\u2019 rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cDid you consent to it?\u201d she asked her colleagues. \u201cI know I didn\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She warned about the critical votes of the World Health Assembly<\/a> that took place several weeks ago in Geneva, Switzerland, explaining how these policies would be binding to Maine and other states \u201cunless we make a clear declaration they have no authority.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          With the assistance of Dr. Meryl Nass<\/a> and the information on the Door to Freedom<\/a> website, Sampson provided her colleagues with a wealth of background information on the WHO\u2019s agenda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She highlighted specific aspects of the WHO\u2019s agenda that she found particularly concerning, such as the proposed BioHub pathogen-sharing<\/a> system and the push for nations to develop genetic sequencing labs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          This article was funded by critical thinkers like you.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

          The Defender is 100% reader-supported. No corporate sponsors. No paywalls. Our writers and editors rely on you to fund stories like this that mainstream media won\u2019t write.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          PLEASE DONATE TODAY<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cDoes anyone see a problem with this?\u201d she asked. \u201cIs it just me? What about the high risks of lab leaks?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson said her colleagues \u201cvery quickly\u201d voted down this joint order, also.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cIt was heart-sickening to watch my colleagues on the other side of the aisle rapidly stand, object, and vote against this motion,\u201d Sampson wrote<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cAll I can say is now they are responsible for the information they have heard,\u201d she told The Defender. \u201cIt is on the record.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          As Sampson prepares to leave the Maine House of Representatives, she shows no signs of slowing down in her fight for health freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sampson\u2019s experiences in the legislature have only reinforced her belief in the importance of being a \u201csqueaky wheel\u201d and speaking truth to power, even in the face of overwhelming opposition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          She is spearheading the Maine Education Project<\/a>, an initiative to expose the failures of the state\u2019s education system and empower parents, teachers and school board members to effect change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"John-Michael<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          John-Michael Dumais<\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n

          John-Michael Dumais is a news editor for The Defender. He has been a writer and community organizer on a variety of issues, including the death penalty, war, health freedom and all things related to the COVID-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          ———————–NEXT————————————<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The struggle or fight between the forces of light and Dark now on earth. <\/a>Please click on the link for the original video\/link please.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=_nU-p_7kbQk
          Fraud to be disclosed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          ☣️WHEN FRAUD WILL BE DISCLOSED!!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          The Truth Can Change Your Life<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          Support my work on Subscribestar: https:\/\/www.subscribestar.com\/truth-c\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Special thanks for your support joining our Youtube membership<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Join us on 👇:
          💜 \/ truthcanchangeyourlife
          💜 \/ 384441361989233<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Voice-over Recording , Audio & Video Production by Truth Can Change Your Life Youtube Channel<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          5D #Starseeds #EndTimeMadness<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

          Transcript<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Greetings my dear beloved children;
          today I would like to talk about the current events taking place on your planet I see my dear that your patience is failing since the agony of dark’s henchmen on Earth is being delayed and sometimes it seems to you that they are winning actually it is no.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Ques so the things now in progress on the planet Earth have no analoges in the universe while change of epics used to be realized either by global cataclysms that wiped off Earth entire continents with their inhabitants or due to the intervention of extraterrestrial races that annihilated your planet’s population with mass destruction weapon.
          Now Earth is moving to another energy space with the humanity Representatives who have managed in prompt time to cover the road of spiritual Evolution and to increase their vibrations up to the level enabling them to make this transition.
          But those who have hold sway over your planet for so many centuries cannot put up with the fact they are losing their prey and are trying tooth and nail to keep their power on Earth remember my series of message about the higher Archy pyramid of power on Earth.<\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

          While at the subtle level this pyramid has almost gone to Pieces the executors of the program on Humanity Annihilation embodied as humans are still vehemently struggling for their life it is them who sew panic and fear among Earth’s population making people accept the procedure fateful for them the the one insidiously disguised as injection that most people on the planet associate with the salutary means rescuing them from diseases until the mass media are in the grip of the criminals who seized Earth it is extremely hard to turn the tide the voices of thousands and thousands of pure human Souls trying to convey truth to people get lost in the tremendous flow of Li proceeding from TV screens newspapers and magazines Pages as well as the internet you see how alternative sources of information are being ousted out of the internet how censorship is Raging. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Added and not part of the video\/link<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

          The world upside down. Instead of doing there work the so-called elected politicians are busy to sell us and pushing through the so-called NWO-Alien contact agenda. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          It is quite obvious that the Rockefellers helped establish and finance the Chicoms, just as they have done with the Bolsheiviks several decades before. After visiting China and surveying its \u201cprogress\u201d in 1973, David Rockefeller stated, \u201cOne is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony\u2026. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded\u2026 in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive\u2026.The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly form the singleness of ideology and purpose\u2026. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao\u2019s leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          Reading the above quote and looking at the picture of Rockefeller and Zhou Enlai, I am immediately reminded of George Orwell\u2019s masterful (and prophetic) book, Animal Farm. In the book, a wealthy \u201cMr. Pilkington\u201d visits a farm operated by communist totalitarian pigs who were supposed to be rebelling against him and everything he represented. Here is a section from the final chapter:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \u201cToo many farmers had assumed, without due enquiry, that on such a farm a spirit of licence and indiscipline would prevail. They had been nervous about the effects upon their own animals, or even upon their human employees. But all such doubts were now dispelled. Today he and his friends had visited Animal Farm and inspected every inch of it with their own eyes, and what did they find? Not only the most up-to-date methods, but a discipline and an orderliness which should be an example to all farmers everywhere. He believed that he was right in saying that the lower animals on Animal Farm did more work and received less food than any animals in the county. Indeed, he and his fellow-visitors today had observed many features which they intended to introduce on their own farms immediately.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Those words were written in 1945, nearly two decades before David Rockefeller\u2019s trip to China. Today, the Council on Foreign Relations (again, through its nefarious publication, Foreign Affairs) is hyping the preferred \u201cChina Model\u201d of state capitalism as the most efficient way of managing economies and societies. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          I should also mention that it was George Soros who said that China, by its example, would lead the West into the New World Order. <\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

          What we are witnessing is an inside struggle between different faction in the NWO\/Alien and positions of power. China will get the lead as agreed. ( Jan)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Orwell was right again.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n


          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          How persecution is Rife and rampant towards honest doctors lawyers and journalists.
          The palpy of the Dragon reptiles have reached every corner of your planet and every person tracking
          their actions and hunting them every time they feel danger coming from them just imagine my dear the large
          scale of the work that is being carried out by the representatives of the light forces on Earth.
          Every minute putting their life at risk to deliver Humanity from digital enslavement and let the best representatives of it to make a unique transition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          I into another dimension in their physical bodies their matter Brooks no haste and is regulated
          from higher Dimensions they are getting enormous support but as enormous is their sphere of activity because it
          Embraces not some specific country but all the planet of yours the enemy is too dangerous my dear
          and they have nothing to lose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Feeling their soon collapse the shadow government’s marionet have staked it all limiting people’s freedoms to the utmost yet by their actions have got just the opposite effect millions of people have risen to fight for their rights and though it happens unevenly in different countries the infeed of the energies of freedom and desire to dispose of one’s life into the collective human conscience has already outweighed the energy of apathy and obedience typical of the co-called average man.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Light always wins over dark and the energy of unity and freedom always wins over the energy of fear and
          cility as their vibrations are incomparable so please my dear when you suddenly lose heart and it seems your strength is draining away sit for a meditation and send your love and support to all the Warriors of light both on Earth and in heaven then the streamlet of your energy will join the vigorous High vibration torrent of the best representatives of humanity that will wash away the last traces of dark’s henchmen<\/strong> and will encourage the long awaited disclosure that will become the turning point of Earth’s rebirth and that of her best inhabitants as well.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          I would like to digress from our topic and talk about how Mass protests taking place in many countries of the world influence the current situation on Earth.<\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

          I see that for many of you it seems they do not bring the desired effect since restrictive measures for
          the side of the ruling top are just getting toughened it is actually not true people’s protests do not simply
          frighten the Govern governments of these countries they make them panic because they understand that globalist plans are falling apart at the seams and that it is field employees for these plans implementation who will have to answer for their criminal actions before the nation those who pushed them.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

          Into to this will remain in the shadow while the atonement will overcome those in the public eye the ones who gave orders spoke on TV and criticized those who disagree but having a feeling of the impending catastrophe immediate executors are becoming still more aggressive as they are perfectly aware that confessing their mistakes cannot mitigate their lot this time too horrible are the consequences of the injections fatal for humans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          They promote what frightens them most is the moment when the fraud will be disclosed and it is already in progress all across the globe and only those deep in dorcy cannot notice this these marionet of the world government keep afloat just thanks to the fact that all the mass media are still in their grip.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          But as soon as alternative trustworthy sources of information appear the truth like a powerful stream will gush out being fortified by irrefutable facts and proofs now on Earth there are two parallel realities that are to cross soon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n


          Anyway because the degree of lie in the mainstream media has reached its maximum being aware they have nothing left to lose now the executives at all the levels of power decided to stake everything trying to stifle the growing discontent of of the society by forc making use of all the facilities at hand physical moral and financial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n


          But as you can see the result appears to be just the opposite more and more people start to revive and feel being deceived it is quite soon now when Mass people’s disorders will sweep away all the Absurd restrictions and the salutary injections imposed by force and it will be the very victory that was spoken about in my recent message people will win over Freedom with their own strengths by realizing the current events and understanding who are at the helm right now and what actual goals of these rulers are unfortunately Mass Revival will not occur though but the best part of humanity will manage to defend their freedom and stop the criminal activities of the deep State and I am happy that many of you will find themselves among these brave people who did not yield to the Menace and provocations for the side of the ruling top your unity and solidarity will work a miracle and believe me my dear your Victory is close now.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          Now now we will digress a little from our topic and we’ll talk about the current developments at the physical level the cornered representatives of the world government their field employees to be exact are now desperately trying to bring till final Victory the human enslavement plan they have been carefully contrived for years in some countries their attempts have really been a success and now we will try to find out why it has happened and on the contrary why in other countries their plans face Reckless opposition for the side of their Nations.
          As a matter of fact my dear pure human Souls always tell the truth from a Lie by intuition and especially when it is their soul their Divine hypostasis that is endangered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          And if to follow this principle according to the reaction of this or that country’s population there can be made conclusions on its population elements in terms of living beings embodied as humans as well as the amount of clones among them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          As you see the least opposition to the Absurd and inhumane demands of the authorities was shown by the inhabitants of China who have accepted the new conditions of their existence in an almost unmm way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          It is just the location of huge Laboratories for clone production who were evenly distributed all over the country it is mainly due to this that the economy of China has revived so quickly where whole armies of clones were created for certain types of activities with their efficiency and endurance many times exceeding those of an average man the same thing on a smaller scale though occurs in some other Asian countries with a low level of culture and education with national and religious Traditions being based on submission to the customs and traditions established from above. <\/p>\n\n\n

          \n
          \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

          Both social and religious ones as far as European countries and American continent countries are concerned a lot here is determined by Collective consciences of beings embodied as humans
          and they are numerous indeed as you know. As for people with two souls in whose physical bodies human Souls exist side by side with Souls of other races and civilizations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Representatives everything is determined by the level of these people’s vibrations since all the media are aimed at filling people with fear for their life all these negative energies are responded to first of all by low
          vibration souls in the human body because it is these energies that are native and dear to them.
          Therefore human souls are stifled and as a result of mass psychosis and fear for one’s life most of such people also become obedient executors of all the Authority’s rules and instructions this is what was staked at by those who have arranged this Balia on Earth they are well informed about the actual composition of your planet’s population yet they did not take into consideration that the pure and ancient human souls in minority will be able to turn the tide which is the case now in many countries of the world.
          The pure energy of the human soul has turned out so powerful that has managed to outweigh the energy of hundreds of thousands of weak and intimidated creatures which came as an unpleasant surprise to the dragon reptiles and Orion who came to believe in their omnipotence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          This is due to this energy that mass Revival on Earth is taking place like fairy tale Heroes all across
          the globe there have risen pure human Souls who are ready to sacrifice their life but not their freedom they have
          rebelled against the dragons eager to ens slave them and will bring this fight till final Victory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          I believe in you my dear and know that your efforts will be a success by all means since you are supported by all the light forces of the universe with your Galaxy brothers and sisters being among them I bless you and love you immensely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

          Father absolute spoke to you<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Links of electricity-from-space;<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

          Humanity and our role within the universe?<\/a>
          Update about the battle between light forces and the dark controllers?<\/a>
          What is happening with our Earth, the Sun moon and Solar system & stay healthy?<\/a>
          Our new Wannabe Rulers\/back ground?<\/a>
          Our Sun, weather and Vulcanic activity movement of tectonic plates on earth?<\/a>
          Ancient Egypt and the black Nobility<\/a>
          Attempts to restore our erased memories from our human past<\/a>
          Buddhist Monks with Superpowers?<\/a>
          Adam & Anunnaki.<\/a>
          Attempts to restore our erased memories from our human past<\/a>
          To remember our human history\/creation of the universe.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          A New Financial System Just To Steal Your Assets nearing completion?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The real motives behind the increase in totalitarian control and introduction of new laws?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Our Cristal mind and changing functions due to our changing environment.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          5000 patents blocked because of the so-called national security only to partly resurfaces now.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Planet earth is on the move & humanity affected.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Urgent: A message of extreme importance today the most crucial period of your planet\u2019s entrance into the space of 5D has started<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Super connectivity at room temperature and missing key to understand free electric energy.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Sound & Vibrational Medicine & Tesla.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Why this industry should be in public hands.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The Tesla World?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Use of frequencies and effects on our bio energy field that surrounds our body.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Owners of the empire<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Finite Element Model for Atmospheric IR-Absorption Joseph Reynen. (CO2)<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Free energy and T. E. Bearden, Ph.D<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          Free energy from space and the Climate Debate.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

          The climate debate!<\/a>
          <\/p>\n\n\n\n

          <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          In the 3 years of the pandemic between 2020 and 2023 there were more than 30 million excess deaths across 125 countries now we’ve been led to believe by the authorities that there’s one obvious cause for this but the authors of a brand new study call this into question.They explicitly say that the data […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6412","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6412"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6412\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7302,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6412\/revisions\/7302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6412"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6412"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/humanityandearth.com\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6412"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}